From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f177.google.com (mail-pl1-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ECB21917CD for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 07:39:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.177 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730878794; cv=none; b=UzAicks8VPdl79i+FmdAoiKcfU1vGSMWzsFN1cnKQCbYOsklmt9/QeLqbseOjUgLAsgDEBcARHVumn7qnGWwl3mAy6g5pKqMg6HDS26c8n5xTDQ1IgvT77LdipqTTGQj2vigYqmvjQhbxm5KFxnIVtI6X2n9Ar90DeA9XJYaZQw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730878794; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F4ay8F3s/iTlRyOmsZamnIzdWLhmsDNWS002odCq51s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=I4l1zfEkl4YYg8F1SEGc9hxdubkC1iKY0BzJkKdozQdRNRa9C0dnXw0vu/7XHKLcWXxlKyO9iGDEPYxVfrmDbBp5gu/+3yJ+GaKarRcl5r9rsozzHOJ0YLOoX5oN9UkKtRhEsYsNY3rzDAxKPF6m+VA6HiDAxawCOTQHcT6iQmE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=eUwuFmWc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.177 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="eUwuFmWc" Received: by mail-pl1-f177.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20cb47387ceso61629035ad.1 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 23:39:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1730878792; x=1731483592; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-disposition:mime-version:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=F4ay8F3s/iTlRyOmsZamnIzdWLhmsDNWS002odCq51s=; b=eUwuFmWcKexd3zMcKPc24jUuvGRWcmfwgUw5ACMxnstHJkRyAOFlw8Bce9p07xI1d6 iBOAbjECEa81U/65p7kGXdnSESJ7RRk1qf+BuGdXkxL96C74XaiLoVJV9RsiC1sVRW6P qpLj5/KpIKxRpdzmIwba3FcodwW5FQLDQ1S5Y6zmzDB3Ls+eirlOyTdZgWLNT1QcU48Z VEsZo4EGKKswqktv3+/tuuOxgWE8uR98MW972321/LC8esFKFb2DGlW6L9bd2ozk7jGj IWrqGP9wZKnw36VB2N70LT2pNHMrQ/8DmsF6QoYuEJhO0r8NK06Me2E8eQoB5P0bqNUS 995w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730878792; x=1731483592; h=content-disposition:mime-version:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=F4ay8F3s/iTlRyOmsZamnIzdWLhmsDNWS002odCq51s=; b=ofZwQeNJdP4iCmVVecG0KciCSg96Ko2PLOKhZv5HBj0s9Ra8Xh5rIwVRoqphcIw1GO h1CwS7yuypLBZClR/8eo5i1D74DWvrVRBu2STpVRl6CpI1Z7jpdAmPfRZPvH2E7E4OEF 64BIMFUEHXbvrEC07j1BSSTi7mXkaseH+fnRhUFGJAq15v8Fp18722QRkIgEOHAFjzZR IDONASwht3YMRCXKC/uauXUpAk2pWXQZJ4WLNMw7e+GlmXXIRYjRuclDrIX2Mm5sxrMi 3Z3kbN8TsM9v+fwG1cthfggY18S05VZms6oNKk84XCHvTQhGHoAZtkE9irGAzlIhLNJw ExWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwLnLc6umUL1RcghtJ0/gd3YgcSojUDJu3to4+CLn3x2wyia2em TcWpmvcQYFXPMmdlsBNs+KhyNIa7EwKjXlnAexlR/mke55O3RLNKb0zlKAaDbGw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGPGCLqH9pbcoeJ27u3HWkhIIsNY0zAm0Ui/UiLHHoMeT3dszcn7QplbYeb745aLO36RbuFPg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e80b:b0:20b:5b16:b16b with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-210c6b08be4mr507728245ad.36.1730878792498; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 23:39:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from fedora ([43.228.180.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2110570bfe6sm89453975ad.109.2024.11.05.23.39.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 Nov 2024 23:39:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 07:39:48 +0000 From: Hangbin Liu To: Jay Vosburgh Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Question]: should we consider arp missed max during bond_ab_arp_probe()? Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Jay, Our QE reported that, when there is no active slave during bond_ab_arp_probe(), the slaves send the arp probe message one by one. This will flap the switch's mac table quickly, sometimes even make the switch stop learning mac address. So should we consider the arp missed max during bond_ab_arp_probe()? i.e. each slave has more chances to send probe messages before switch to another slave. What do you think? Thanks Hangbin