From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f50.google.com (mail-ej1-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92B2238F82 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 08:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.50 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730882109; cv=none; b=BDC2vkBQa8ejwMflRFKzkp6PlT5sNfEUlcI+7MSzurUGCwJg7I2brgX6rUrT1fDSPva8d4FJ22fn7hqLLOVJz6WFMuY9WDUX5WvYExjuHhXiMMrEpSmJJeK7HboShUD+FhBzVarWYhxYfRiTBzjLdPtaaB/oNWmVA2HNhqmkh5c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730882109; c=relaxed/simple; bh=e4d0J1mON+nner407B/cwkTDyHgK6lc1uIuucXRrqT8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=l7BgOFQC21tPNs3ExQoGJBUHJRcbrBla2n5ijf0dB+JFD/iqnes3xk3PrO0bluU9fOx8RSQko/WrlWRzK0YCSEj8fxZxswxbHwr14RJ/QM5ahGUjcrcqDCP1eSqMyAUMH3jwTPIJtp4gQZZrhjBKOQrID8SnFFtwKoTq5/Iojg0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=resnulli.us; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=resnulli.us; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=q9lffgI1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.50 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=resnulli.us Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=resnulli.us Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="q9lffgI1" Received: by mail-ej1-f50.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a9eaaab29bcso419631766b.2 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:35:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1730882104; x=1731486904; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=e4d0J1mON+nner407B/cwkTDyHgK6lc1uIuucXRrqT8=; b=q9lffgI1Z9QPsvTwRzlF6BXYBjzbepACUq36+AURSSp7MGgVPvS68yk2ZKtQ0AtkiW 6dzFc7q0ftS2EsnVFAP9cQvOYjd/myy1519m67HdtGfa3b/HZFJR9D65pLQ36dYEtzvJ RvUnfDyVouPAOzraSRxgIJxd53FvJCtwTq4iNo1hMeP2iTcfGuf20UvCxZNbSyOrQG7t MzvfLPBRWezjzZjp8BtV5D2/V9CskvYvt7q/QkEFI5IGInsGdIH67aBWETZVYJLlve/e O6aV20Gfhvp+4k+2MCKVTMBuvbJcoEI1geA8+uzI005oG5v4WNXknNIiOJZvJPr30vTY ZnWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730882104; x=1731486904; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=e4d0J1mON+nner407B/cwkTDyHgK6lc1uIuucXRrqT8=; b=C2GP9S+geSU8BcuHajLVgDxrLUhtXkXbIznwubjtOOM/dhjiNHoufBLnxlYbhWIbbG e0kXY9jFlENdPjCyxE8DRLzaKJaRXI+PRkRwL+/WPXsmSjT5a1VzVCEybb1XeczEvqHF ziwJamw0MPAQfsq31QLdjCQww5qMsEi4su47OngbpAPgbN/zFDl7E5aDi3by0RnaaDTv gQUTQli5R+oOUJmS/z25Ab1L2INeEqhyHTQHa08iEkO1X8PuLJ5wEAvpgW0Aarr0SvjL ACNETtPK/J4SyTHr6p99jxGq4n8rrytnSZPBQH/aFMMoypcApj9IBXqZthgWuy0DOGJy Q6vQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCULN5X4eU2w88j2D4H72eJ6MSMYTx8gQy+mpQoqzK/7aioZvD8lloMkOVgHI2BTxnDf5L/wPuk=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyrF05y1dSc9UTPGGN9w95b0WaIMcMsS+y0+GTvKFotAu5noIIP +q8CgLAmyg2pgPw+k1Dn5QM4vPyp0c9IqxgIzz2TBKpGTjEQqVQrv+lw7yfNn9l3ujqF2SSFEkF I X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFTUZQaAcwJvlvgaKXWEFp9EXf7FD1qecYtXRjGDo8UW4IcikhnGzNSM8+vU54fWa75fAPAKw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7e8f:b0:a9a:183a:b84e with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a9e50b928acmr2219634166b.40.1730882103611; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:35:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([193.47.165.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a9eb16a10cfsm244206766b.9.2024.11.06.00.35.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:35:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:34:59 +0100 From: Jiri Pirko To: Hangbin Liu Cc: Jay Vosburgh , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Question]: should we consider arp missed max during bond_ab_arp_probe()? Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 08:39:48AM CET, liuhangbin@gmail.com wrote: >Hi Jay, > >Our QE reported that, when there is no active slave during >bond_ab_arp_probe(), the slaves send the arp probe message one by one. This >will flap the switch's mac table quickly, sometimes even make the switch stop >learning mac address. So should we consider the arp missed max during >bond_ab_arp_probe()? i.e. each slave has more chances to send probe messages >before switch to another slave. What do you think? Out of curiosity, is anyone still using AB mode in real life? And if yes, any idea why exacly? > >Thanks >Hangbin >