netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
Cc: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srk@ti.com,
	Pekka Varis <p-varis@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: enable DSCP to priority map for RX
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:17:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzX4eD/0i8SOOZGP@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9d3a6c8-fb12-4926-8c2b-414017681f03@kernel.org>

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 02:47:07PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> 
> 
> On 14/11/2024 14:02, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 12:12:47PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> On 14/11/2024 11:41, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>> On 14/11/2024 02:16, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> >>>> So what about following the IETF mapping found in section 4.3?
> >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8325#section-4.3
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for this tip.
> >>> I will update this patch to have the default DSCP to UP mapping as per
> >>> above link and map all unused DSCP to UP 0.
> >>
> >> How does the below code look in this regard?
> > 
> > Looks generally good to me. A few comments inline though.
> > 
> >> static void am65_cpsw_port_enable_dscp_map(struct am65_cpsw_port *slave)
> >> {
> >> 	int dscp, pri;
> >> 	u32 val;
> >>
> >> 	/* Default DSCP to User Priority mapping as per:
> >> 	 * https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8325#section-4.3
> > 
> > Maybe also add a link to
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8622#section-11
> > which defines the LE PHB (Low Effort) and updates RFC 8325 accordingly.
> > 
> >> 	 */
> >> 	for (dscp = 0; dscp <= AM65_CPSW_DSCP_MAX; dscp++) {
> >> 		switch (dscp) {
> >> 		case 56:	/* CS7 */
> >> 		case 48:	/* CS6 */
> >> 			pri = 7;
> >> 			break;
> >> 		case 46:	/* EF */
> >> 		case 44:	/* VA */
> >> 			pri = 6;
> >> 			break;
> >> 		case 40:	/* CS5 */
> >> 			pri = 5;
> >> 			break;
> >> 		case 32:	/* CS4 */
> >> 		case 34:	/* AF41 */
> >> 		case 36:	/* AF42 */
> >> 		case 38:	/* AF43 */
> >> 		case 24:	/* CS3 */
> >> 		case 26:	/* AF31 */
> >> 		case 28:	/* AF32 */
> >> 		case 30:	/* AF33 */
> > 
> > Until case 32 (CS4) you've kept the order of RFC 8325, table 1.
> > It'd make life easier for reviewers if you could keep this order
> > here. That is, moving CS4 after AF43 and CS3 after AF33.
> > 
> >> 			pri = 4;
> >> 			break;
> >> 		case 17:	/* AF21 */
> > 
> > AF21 is 18, not 17.
> > 
> >> 		case 20:	/* AF22 */
> >> 		case 22:	/* AF23 */
> >> 			pri = 3;
> >> 			break;
> >> 		case 8:		/* CS1 */
> > 
> > Let's be complete and add the case for LE (RFC 8622), which also
> > maps to 1.
> 
> All comments are valid. I will fix and send v4 for this series.
> 
> > 
> >> 			pri = 1;
> >> 			break;
> 
> For sake of completeness I will mention CS2, AF11, AF12, AF13
> here that can fallback to default case.

Yes, very nice.

> >> 		default:
> >> 			pri = 0;
> >> 			break;
> >> 		}
> >>
> >> 		am65_cpsw_port_set_dscp_map(slave, dscp, pri);
> >> 	}
> >>
> >> 	/* enable port IPV4 and IPV6 DSCP for this port */
> >> 	val = readl(slave->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PORTN_REG_CTL);
> >> 	val |= AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_CTL_DSCP_IPV4_EN |
> >> 		AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_CTL_DSCP_IPV6_EN;
> >> 	writel(val, slave->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PORTN_REG_CTL);
> >> }
> >>
> >>>
> 
> -- 
> cheers,
> -roger
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-14 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-09 11:00 [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: enable DSCP to priority map for RX Roger Quadros
2024-11-09 11:00 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: update pri_thread_map as per IEEE802.1Q-2014 Roger Quadros
2024-11-09 11:00 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: enable DSCP to priority map for RX Roger Quadros
2024-11-11  5:28   ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-11-14  0:16   ` Guillaume Nault
2024-11-14  9:41     ` Roger Quadros
2024-11-14 10:12       ` Roger Quadros
2024-11-14 12:02         ` Guillaume Nault
2024-11-14 12:47           ` Roger Quadros
2024-11-14 13:17             ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2024-11-14 12:13       ` Guillaume Nault
2024-11-12 14:08 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] " Simon Horman
2024-11-14  0:19   ` Guillaume Nault
2024-11-14  8:55     ` Roger Quadros

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZzX4eD/0i8SOOZGP@debian \
    --to=gnault@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p-varis@ti.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
    --cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
    --cc=srk@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).