From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Regression in e1000e since Kernel 4.14.3
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 00:47:10 +0100
Message-ID: <a117fc7c-e65f-7bae-d266-877686af1870@gmail.com>
References: <2d4f3853-a81d-d37d-6b1c-5b4416bcb91d@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: "rwarsow@gmx.de" <rwarsow@gmx.de>
Return-path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <2d4f3853-a81d-d37d-6b1c-5b4416bcb91d@gmx.de>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On 04.12.2017 23:10, rwarsow@gmx.de wrote:

> Hallo
> 
> someone and I got an regression with e1000e since kernel 4.14.3 and it seems there is 4.14.4 on the way without a fix.
> 
> 
> bug report is here:
> 
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047

( added stable and netdev to CC )

Yes I have a box with e1000e and it seems something at least breaks NM after 4.14.3.

Interesting here , when using connman the connection is stable.

Regards,

Gabriel C