From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
To: Mengyuan Lou <mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>
Cc: <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>, <duanqiangwen@net-swift.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <horms@kernel.org>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/2] net: libwx: add support for set_ringparam in wx_ethtool_ops_vf
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 12:19:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a12bf43b-1cb2-4ca6-b2bb-f4618bc4e8b1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710015925.34769-2-mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>
On 7/10/26 03:59, Mengyuan Lou wrote:
> Add support for the set_ringparam in wx_ethtool_ops_vf,
> which is used to set ring sizes for ngbevf and txgbevf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mengyuan Lou <mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_ethtool.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c | 9 +--
> drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.h | 4 +-
> .../net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_vf_common.c | 4 +-
> .../net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_vf_common.h | 2 +
> 5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_ethtool.c
> index 5df971aca9e3..eae038df6875 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_ethtool.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include "wx_ethtool.h"
> #include "wx_hw.h"
> #include "wx_lib.h"
> +#include "wx_vf_common.h"
>
> struct wx_stats {
> char stat_string[ETH_GSTRING_LEN];
> @@ -775,6 +776,65 @@ static int wx_get_link_ksettings_vf(struct net_device *netdev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int wx_set_ringparam_vf(struct net_device *netdev,
> + struct ethtool_ringparam *ring,
> + struct kernel_ethtool_ringparam *kernel_ring,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + struct wx *wx = netdev_priv(netdev);
> + u32 new_rx_count, new_tx_count;
> + struct wx_ring *temp_ring;
> + int i, err = 0;
> +
> + new_tx_count = clamp_t(u32, ring->tx_pending, WX_MIN_TXD, WX_MAX_TXD);
> + new_tx_count = ALIGN(new_tx_count, WX_REQ_TX_DESCRIPTOR_MULTIPLE);
> +
> + new_rx_count = clamp_t(u32, ring->rx_pending, WX_MIN_RXD, WX_MAX_RXD);
> + new_rx_count = ALIGN(new_rx_count, WX_REQ_RX_DESCRIPTOR_MULTIPLE);
> +
> + if (new_tx_count == wx->tx_ring_count &&
> + new_rx_count == wx->rx_ring_count)
> + return 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&wx->reset_lock);
> + set_bit(WX_STATE_RESETTING, wx->state);
> +
> + if (!netif_running(wx->netdev)) {
> + for (i = 0; i < wx->num_tx_queues; i++)
> + wx->tx_ring[i]->count = new_tx_count;
> + for (i = 0; i < wx->num_rx_queues; i++)
> + wx->rx_ring[i]->count = new_rx_count;
> + wx->tx_ring_count = new_tx_count;
> + wx->rx_ring_count = new_rx_count;
> +
> + goto clear_reset;
> + }
> +
> + /* allocate temporary buffer to store rings in */
> + i = max_t(int, wx->num_tx_queues, wx->num_rx_queues);
> + temp_ring = kvmalloc_objs(struct wx_ring, i);
> + if (!temp_ring) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto clear_reset;
> + }
would be much better to move tempbuf allocation into the helper,
and just do it at the beginning there
in the unlikely event of -ENOMEM, you will just call the "up"
in the unroll path
> +
> + wxvf_down(wx);
> + /* wx_set_ring() may partially apply changes before
> + * returning an error. The error indicates that not all
> + * requested ring parameters could be configured.
> + */
> + err = wx_set_ring(wx, new_tx_count, new_rx_count, temp_ring);
> + if (err)
> + wx_err(wx, "failed to set ring parameters: %d", err);
> + wx_configure_vf(wx);
> + wxvf_up_complete(wx);
> + kvfree(temp_ring);
> +clear_reset:
> + clear_bit(WX_STATE_RESETTING, wx->state);
> + mutex_unlock(&wx->reset_lock);
> + return err;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 1:59 [PATCH net-next v7 0/2] net: libwx: improve VF ethtool support Mengyuan Lou
2026-07-10 1:59 ` [PATCH net-next v7 1/2] net: libwx: add support for set_ringparam in wx_ethtool_ops_vf Mengyuan Lou
2026-07-10 10:19 ` Przemek Kitszel [this message]
2026-07-10 1:59 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/2] net: libwx: add support for set_coalesce " Mengyuan Lou
2026-07-10 10:24 ` Przemek Kitszel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a12bf43b-1cb2-4ca6-b2bb-f4618bc4e8b1@intel.com \
--to=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=duanqiangwen@net-swift.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mengyuanlou@net-swift.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox