netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
To: Yanjun Zhu <yanjun.zhu@oracle.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, keescook@chromium.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: nvidia: forcedeth: Fix two possible concurrency use-after-free bugs
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:03:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a1a71d06-9c1c-7e18-0e24-103fa89facf2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f87bd4b7-81d5-1f0c-137e-ecbc02753257@oracle.com>



On 2019/1/9 9:24, Yanjun Zhu wrote:
>
> On 2019/1/8 20:57, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2019/1/8 20:54, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>>>
>>> 在 2019/1/8 20:45, Jia-Ju Bai 写道:
>>>> In drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c, the functions
>>>> nv_start_xmit() and nv_start_xmit_optimized() can be concurrently
>>>> executed with nv_poll_controller().
>>>>
>>>> nv_start_xmit
>>>>    line 2321: prev_tx_ctx->skb = skb;
>>>>
>>>> nv_start_xmit_optimized
>>>>    line 2479: prev_tx_ctx->skb = skb;
>>>>
>>>> nv_poll_controller
>>>>    nv_do_nic_poll
>>>>      line 4134: spin_lock(&np->lock);
>>>>      nv_drain_rxtx
>>>>        nv_drain_tx
>>>>          nv_release_txskb
>>>>            line 2004: dev_kfree_skb_any(tx_skb->skb);
>>>>
>>>> Thus, two possible concurrency use-after-free bugs may occur.
>>>>
>>>> To fix these possible bugs,
>>>
>>>
>>> Does this really occur? Can you reproduce this ?
>>
>> This bug is not found by the real execution.
>> It is found by a static tool written by myself, and then I check it 
>> by manual code review.
>
> Before "line 2004: dev_kfree_skb_any(tx_skb->skb); ",
>
> "
>
>                 nv_disable_irq(dev);
>                 nv_napi_disable(dev);
>                 netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
>                 netif_addr_lock(dev);
>                 spin_lock(&np->lock);
>                 /* stop engines */
>                 nv_stop_rxtx(dev);   <---this stop rxtx
>                 nv_txrx_reset(dev);
> "
>
> In this case, does nv_start_xmit or nv_start_xmit_optimized still work 
> well?
>

nv_stop_rxtx() calls nv_stop_tx(dev).

static void nv_stop_tx(struct net_device *dev)
{
     struct fe_priv *np = netdev_priv(dev);
     u8 __iomem *base = get_hwbase(dev);
     u32 tx_ctrl = readl(base + NvRegTransmitterControl);

     if (!np->mac_in_use)
         tx_ctrl &= ~NVREG_XMITCTL_START;
     else
         tx_ctrl |= NVREG_XMITCTL_TX_PATH_EN;
     writel(tx_ctrl, base + NvRegTransmitterControl);
     if (reg_delay(dev, NvRegTransmitterStatus, NVREG_XMITSTAT_BUSY, 0,
               NV_TXSTOP_DELAY1, NV_TXSTOP_DELAY1MAX))
         netdev_info(dev, "%s: TransmitterStatus remained busy\n",
                 __func__);

     udelay(NV_TXSTOP_DELAY2);
     if (!np->mac_in_use)
         writel(readl(base + NvRegTransmitPoll) & 
NVREG_TRANSMITPOLL_MAC_ADDR_REV,
                base + NvRegTransmitPoll);
}

nv_stop_tx() seems to only write registers to stop transmitting for 
hardware.
But it does not wait until nv_start_xmit() and nv_start_xmit_optimized() 
finish execution.
Maybe netif_stop_queue() should be used here to stop transmitting for 
network layer, but this function does not seem to wait, either.
Do you know any function that can wait until ".ndo_start_xmit" finish 
execution?


Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-09  2:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-08 12:45 [PATCH] net: nvidia: forcedeth: Fix two possible concurrency use-after-free bugs Jia-Ju Bai
2019-01-08 12:54 ` Zhu Yanjun
2019-01-08 12:57   ` Jia-Ju Bai
2019-01-09  1:24     ` Yanjun Zhu
2019-01-09  1:24       ` Yanjun Zhu
2019-01-09  2:03       ` Jia-Ju Bai [this message]
2019-01-09  2:03         ` Jia-Ju Bai
2019-01-09  2:35         ` Yanjun Zhu
2019-01-09  3:20           ` Jia-Ju Bai
2019-01-09  3:24             ` Yanjun Zhu
2019-01-09  3:25               ` Jia-Ju Bai
2019-01-09  3:25                 ` Jia-Ju Bai
2019-01-12  1:53 ` David Miller
2019-01-12  1:53   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a1a71d06-9c1c-7e18-0e24-103fa89facf2@gmail.com \
    --to=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yanjun.zhu@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).