From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Mark expected switch fall-throughs and fix missing
 break
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:36:19 -0400
Message-ID: <a1b9b68a-ca94-f02f-4a87-bbd46782c41c@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1540208577.git.gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1540208577.git.gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On 10/22/18 7:49 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, this patchset aims
> to mark multiple switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> Also, the second patch in this series fixes a missing break in switch.

Enabling that sounds like a great way to inflict pain and suffering.

Not a big deal to put that in the code, the second patch looks fine though.

Jes