From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sarah Newman Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Questions about crashes and GRO Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:35:14 -0800 Message-ID: References: <8b16913d-97b0-cef1-4af5-dedbb522f506@computer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sf.net, Netdev To: Alexander Duyck Return-path: Received: from d.mail.sonic.net ([64.142.111.50]:33222 "EHLO d.mail.sonic.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751207AbdKTXf0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:35:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/20/2017 02:56 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Sarah Newman wrote: >> On 11/20/2017 08:36 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: >>> Hi Sarah, >>> >>> I am adding the netdev mailing list as I am not certain this is an >>> i350 specific issue. The traces themselves aren't anything I recognize >>> as an existing issue. From what I can tell it looks like you are >>> running Xen, so would I be correct in assuming you are bridging >>> between VMs? If so are you using any sort of tunnels on your network, >>> if so what type? This information would be useful as we may be looking >>> at a bug in a tunnel offload for GRO. >> >> Yes, there's bridging. The traffic on the physical device is tagged with vlans and the bridges use untagged traffic. There are no tunnels. I do not >> own the VMs traffic. >> >> Because I have only seen this on a single server with unique hardware, I think it's most likely related to the hardware or to a particular VM on that >> server. > > So I would suspect traffic coming from the VM if anything. The i350 is > a pretty common device. If we were seeing issues specific to it > would expect we would have more reports than just the one so far. My confusion was primarily related to the release notes for an older version of a different intel driver. But regarding traffic coming from a VM, the backtraces both include igb_poll. Doesn't that mean the problem is related to inbound traffic on the igb device and not traffic direct from a local VM? --Sarah