From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Peterson Subject: Re: IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM question... Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:29:10 -0700 Message-ID: References: <200904061430.26276.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> <200904071744.17727.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> <1239220294.31467.55.camel@calx> <200904090954.54601.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> <1239296459.31467.142.camel@calx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Robin Getz , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Matt Mackall Return-path: Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.29]:17122 "EHLO yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754815AbZDJB3M (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:29:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1239296459.31467.142.camel@calx> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Hmm, this is a purely internal interface. Not sure if we need to bother > with scheduling it. My plan was to simply get the new code in and sweep > the kernel. Matt, sounds like you're volunteering? :) >>From my understanding, the roadmap looks something like: 1. Add checkpatch warning about IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM 2. Add any new add_*_randomness() functions (e.g. RTC and main clocks? Serial or USB interrupts?) 3. Remove IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM macro (and checkpatch warning) 4. Add "pragmatic entropy accounting model"? chris