From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net] net/mlx5: Fix performance regression for request-response workloads
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:44:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2f09b8a-add5-6bc4-64d2-6ac67e334fe0@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d58b5b49-aea6-c980-fc4d-6eab596ddc9d@linux.ibm.com>
On 29.12.22 09:27, Alexandra Winter wrote:
>
>
> On 01.10.22 01:37, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> On 26 Sep 12:06, Alexandra Winter wrote:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>>
>>> Saeed,
>>> As discussed at LPC, could you please consider adding a workaround to the
>>> Mellanox driver, to use non-SG SKBs for small messages? As mentioned above
>>> we are seeing 13% throughput degradation, if 2 pages need to be mapped
>>> instead of 1.
>>>
>>> While Eric's ideas sound very promising, just using non-SG in these cases
>>> should be enough to mitigate the performance regression we see.
>>
>> Hi Alexandra, sorry for the late response.
>>
>> Yeas linearizing small messages makes sense, but will require some careful
>> perf testing.
>>
>> We will do our best to include this in the next kernel release cycle.
>> I will take it with the mlx5e team next week, everybody is on vacation this
>> time of year :).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Saeed.
>
> Hello Saeed,
> may I ask whether you had a chance to include such a patch in the 6.2 kernel?
> Or is this still on your ToDo list?
> I haven't seen anything like this on the mailing list, but I may have overlooked it.
> All the best for 2023
> Alexandra
Hello Saeed,
any news about linearizing small messages? Is there any way we could be of help?
Kind regards
Alexandra
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-27 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-07 12:25 [RFC net] tcp: Fix performance regression for request-response workloads Alexandra Winter
2022-09-07 16:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-09-08 9:40 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-09-08 12:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-09-26 10:06 ` [RFC net] net/mlx5: " Alexandra Winter
2022-09-30 23:37 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-12-29 8:27 ` Alexandra Winter
2023-04-27 9:44 ` Alexandra Winter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2f09b8a-add5-6bc4-64d2-6ac67e334fe0@linux.ibm.com \
--to=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).