From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6A6F1D7E52; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728324211; cv=none; b=bTd2ThyFct3Y+RUxhpzw7N25TnhNcqXWTc0gph4e/35bcxCRG78C3FyoTMLDpw9QqdphUnCp01JWzwHg3rZhWraFPJmsvX5SZr+lkMNJDqnIDwjy73CeJK/xRAIO1aurhRYfsr2+GW6AJfkYiC4ICOER78JkDF6xZuEPdVJTZzA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728324211; c=relaxed/simple; bh=B1mZE0N2X/yCAgDrOrhJGdqA0h+LFD87htjVqlJD29A=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=h4WyVEfk/o60vMZnvRVuzsI3yIPSOYZaRftdNW2y+tFiHmD6m7KyIFl/zR36+tQF1qgK3PKrOxpb/69QJP+km/ig/Sc3V1QmECzTc5RQGrDfisSaKmkWVjqJFLMxXI59BGbcu4m54RrUqFo/sLmnb38zwpsrxDcIzq3LGmkIrcE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=yLFCOL6Z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="yLFCOL6Z" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=WKYte81COsWFAAiRQ+dqjNjWEUCtePdNcsRwDhzDvHw=; t=1728324209; x=1729533809; b=yLFCOL6ZXstsCPbf/blVGe7jLCPt9ytNErerLWZy8KO1gvi I5jGObbnxLUNPiqG+yZElUmWRX76SKf3AVhGQwkwI/CkNroN0DSWBFvvjuOEOyN/q+zuQ5iChZBFJ CAC1MZ6z3NJGAGTt2f/7t8YEonQ5sokn0Yeqe47BxNjF69a+QyeBqry6en+1QA5C/kCDr91oq17Mx U9Ctk+2x6Nukgeczey0ChZEPnKQU3Gc0e+d6NkEnHQnuQXfPCU6l7FHBypUNj4h21wCaG774u14s9 EVd3aPpVYsdlrrfNEnLIJVu1gaAhp7xPxdPa9tSXsgUoR+oykaQQmU2UNeP46CJg==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1sxs4p-00000003TZQ-10bS; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 20:03:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net 1/2] MAINTAINERS: consistently exclude wireless files from NETWORKING [GENERAL] From: Johannes Berg To: Kalle Valo , Simon Horman Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Willem de Bruijn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 20:03:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ed4r4xqn.fsf@kernel.org> References: <20241004-maint-net-hdrs-v1-0-41fd555aacc5@kernel.org> <20241004-maint-net-hdrs-v1-1-41fd555aacc5@kernel.org> <87setb7us5.fsf@kernel.org> <20241007141305.GD32733@kernel.org> <87ed4r4xqn.fsf@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.4 (3.52.4-1.fc40) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Mon, 2024-10-07 at 20:41 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Simon Horman writes: >=20 > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 06:27:38PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > >=20 > > > Simon Horman writes: > > >=20 > > > > We already exclude wireless drivers from the netdev@ traffic, to > > > > delegate it to linux-wireless@, and avoid overwhelming netdev@. > > > >=20 > > > > Many of the following wireless-related sections MAINTAINERS > > > > are already not included in the NETWORKING [GENERAL] section. > > > > For consistency, exclude those that are. > > > >=20 > > > > * 802.11 (including CFG80211/NL80211) > > > > * MAC80211 > > > > * RFKILL > > > >=20 > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman > > > > --- > > > > MAINTAINERS | 11 +++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > > >=20 > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > > index c27f3190737f..ea3ea2c0d3fa 100644 > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > > @@ -16197,8 +16197,19 @@ F: lib/random32.c > > > > F: net/ > > > > F: tools/net/ > > > > F: tools/testing/selftests/net/ > > > > +X: Documentation/networking/mac80211-injection.rst > > > > +X: Documentation/networking/mac80211_hwsim/ > > > > +X: Documentation/networking/regulatory.rst > > > > +X: include/net/cfg80211.h > > > > +X: include/net/ieee80211_radiotap.h > > > > +X: include/net/iw_handler.h > > > > +X: include/net/mac80211.h > > > > +X: include/net/wext.h > > >=20 > > > Should we add also lib80211.h? > >=20 > > Thanks, I missed that one. Perhaps it should have: > >=20 > > * An F: entry in the MAC80211 > > * An X: entry in the NETWORKING [GENERAL] > >=20 > > If so, perhaps I can just add that to a v2 of this patch. > > Let me know what you think. >=20 > Like Johannes said, the cfg80211 entry is more approriate but otherwise > sounds like a good plan, thanks! Actually scratch that, please just ignore it. I'm going to remove that header file entirely and move the functionality into libipw in the ipw2x00 drivers. johannes