From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, jiri@resnulli.us, j.vosburgh@gmail.com,
andy@greyhouse.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jarod@redhat.com,
wangyufen@huawei.com,
syzbot+60748c96cf5c6df8e581@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: fix stack overflow when LRO is disabled for virtual interfaces
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 01:21:00 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a43c690e-5768-02ea-5e1f-9f7ae32236cf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZGIvbCJqAgVMIJ57@corigine.com>
On 5/15/23 22:11, Simon Horman wrote:
Hi Simon,
Thank you so much for the review!
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 05:37:40AM +0000, Taehee Yoo wrote:
>> When the virtual interface's feature is updated, it synchronizes the
>> updated feature for its own lower interface.
>> This propagation logic should be worked as the iteration, not
recursively.
>> But it works recursively due to the netdev notification unexpectedly.
>> This problem occurs when it disables LRO only for the team and bonding
>> interface type.
>>
>> team0
>> |
>> +------+------+-----+-----+
>> | | | | |
>> team1 team2 team3 ... team200
>>
>> If team0's LRO feature is updated, it generates the NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE
>> event to its own lower interfaces(team1 ~ team200).
>> It is worked by netdev_sync_lower_features().
>> So, the NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE notification logic of each lower interface
>> work iteratively.
>> But generated NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE event is also sent to the upper
>> interface too.
>> upper interface(team0) generates the NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE event for
its own
>> lower interfaces again.
>> lower and upper interfaces receive this event and generate this
>> event again and again.
>> So, the stack overflow occurs.
>>
>> But it is not the infinite loop issue.
>> Because the netdev_sync_lower_features() updates features before
>> generating the NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE event.
>> Already synchronized lower interfaces skip notification logic.
>> So, it is just the problem that iteration logic is changed to the
>> recursive unexpectedly due to the notification mechanism.
>>
>> Reproducer:
>>
>> ip link add team0 type team
>> ethtool -K team0 lro on
>> for i in {1..200}
>> do
>> ip link add team$i master team0 type team
>> ethtool -K team$i lro on
>> done
>>
>> ethtool -K team0 lro off
>>
>> In order to fix it, the priv_notifier_ctx net_device member is
introduced.
>> This variable can be used by each interface in its own way in the
>> notification context. The bonding and team interface is going to use it
>> to avoid duplicated NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE event handling.
>>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+60748c96cf5c6df8e581@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Fixes: fd867d51f889 ("net/core: generic support for disabling netdev
features down stack")
>> Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> index 08fbd4622ccf..ebd49a54f0d5 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> @@ -2393,6 +2393,7 @@ struct net_device {
>> unsigned threaded:1;
>>
>> struct list_head net_notifier_list;
>> + u32 priv_notifier_ctx;
>
> Hi Taehee,
>
> Please add this new field to the kdoc for struct net_device.
>
Thanks! I will check this before submitting the v2 patch.
Thank you so much,
Taehee Yoo
>>
>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACSEC)
>> /* MACsec management functions */
>
> ...
>
> ---
> pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-15 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-15 5:37 [PATCH net] net: fix stack overflow when LRO is disabled for virtual interfaces Taehee Yoo
2023-05-15 6:24 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-05-15 9:12 ` Taehee Yoo
2023-05-16 8:34 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-05-16 11:29 ` Taehee Yoo
2023-05-15 13:11 ` Simon Horman
2023-05-15 16:21 ` Taehee Yoo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a43c690e-5768-02ea-5e1f-9f7ae32236cf@gmail.com \
--to=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=j.vosburgh@gmail.com \
--cc=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
--cc=syzbot+60748c96cf5c6df8e581@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=wangyufen@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).