netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, andrew@lunn.ch, olteanv@gmail.com,
	hkallweit1@gmail.com, kabel@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: Cleanup struct mdio_driver_common
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 10:03:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5aca886-ca0a-8170-417f-a189ec28c87f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZZRJLg6U0G5CNRQ0@shell.armlinux.org.uk>


On 2024/1/3 01:34, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 03:23:50PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote:
>> The struct mdio_driver_common is a wrapper for driver-model structure,
>> it contains device_driver and flags. There are only struct phy_driver
>> and mdio_driver that use it. The flags is used to distinguish between
>> struct phy_driver and mdio_driver.
>>
>> We can test that if probe of device_driver is equal to phy_probe. This
>> way, the struct mdio_driver_common is no longer needed, and struct
>> phy_driver and usb_mdio_driver will be consistent with other driver
>> structs.
> usb_mdio_driver?

This is a mistake. It should be 'mdio_driver'.

>
> I'm not sure why this consistency is even desired, the commit message
> doesn't properly say _why_ this change is being proposed.

Most drivers use device_driver directly. This should be added to the commit.

Like this:

struct sdio_driver {

... ...

         struct device_driver drv;
};


struct pcie_port_service_driver {

... ...

         struct device_driver driver;
};

and so on ...


>
>> +bool is_phy_driver(struct device_driver *driver)
>> +{
>> +	return driver->probe == phy_probe;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_phy_driver);
> Do we really need this exported? It doesn't seem like something anything
> other than core MDIO/phylib code should know about, and all that becomes
> a single module when building it in a modular way - phylib can't be a
> separate module from mdio stuff.
I think this exported can be removed.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-03  2:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-28  7:23 [PATCH net-next] net: phy: Cleanup struct mdio_driver_common Yajun Deng
2023-12-28  8:24 ` Przemek Kitszel
2023-12-28  8:37   ` Yajun Deng
2024-01-02 17:34 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-01-03  2:03   ` Yajun Deng [this message]
2024-01-03 10:51     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-01-03 11:38       ` Yajun Deng
2024-01-03 13:30         ` Andrew Lunn
2024-01-03 18:25 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a5aca886-ca0a-8170-417f-a189ec28c87f@linux.dev \
    --to=yajun.deng@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kabel@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).