public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: David Yang <mmyangfl@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
	David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/3] net: dsa: yt921x: Fix MIB overflow wraparound routine
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 10:41:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5b78a79-8f8a-44d3-9a1e-1019ec57f910@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260118013019.1078847-2-mmyangfl@gmail.com>

On 1/18/26 2:30 AM, David Yang wrote:
> Reported by the following Smatch static checker warning:
> 
>   drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c:702 yt921x_read_mib()
>   warn: was expecting a 64 bit value instead of '(~0)'
> 
> Fixes: 186623f4aa72 ("net: dsa: yt921x: Add support for Motorcomm YT921x")
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/aPsjYKQMzpY0nSXm@stanley.mountain/
> Suggested-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Yang <mmyangfl@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c b/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c
> index 0b3df732c0d1..5e4e8093ba16 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/yt921x.c
> @@ -682,21 +682,22 @@ static int yt921x_read_mib(struct yt921x_priv *priv, int port)
>  		const struct yt921x_mib_desc *desc = &yt921x_mib_descs[i];
>  		u32 reg = YT921X_MIBn_DATA0(port) + desc->offset;
>  		u64 *valp = &((u64 *)mib)[i];
> -		u64 val = *valp;
>  		u32 val0;
> -		u32 val1;
> +		u64 val;
>  
>  		res = yt921x_reg_read(priv, reg, &val0);
>  		if (res)
>  			break;
>  
>  		if (desc->size <= 1) {
> -			if (val < (u32)val)
> -				/* overflow */
> -				val += (u64)U32_MAX + 1;
> -			val &= ~U32_MAX;
> -			val |= val0;
> +			u64 old_val = *valp;

Why targeting net-next here? the blamed commit is already in Linus'tree
and it looks like the above could causes functional issues, ad the wrong
value is written into the mib.

I think this should go via net.

/P


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-22  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-18  1:30 [PATCH net-next v6 0/3] net: dsa: yt921x: Fix MIB overflow wraparound routine David Yang
2026-01-18  1:30 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/3] " David Yang
2026-01-22  9:41   ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-01-22 13:19     ` Yangfl
2026-01-22 15:21       ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-18  1:30 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/3] net: dsa: yt921x: Return early for failed MIB read David Yang
2026-01-18 16:06   ` Andrew Lunn
2026-01-18 19:24     ` Yangfl
2026-01-22  9:58       ` Paolo Abeni
2026-01-18  1:30 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/3] net: dsa: yt921x: Use u64_stats_t for MIB stats David Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a5b78a79-8f8a-44d3-9a1e-1019ec57f910@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmyangfl@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox