netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	yangpeihao@sjtu.edu.cn, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, martin.lau@kernel.org,
	sinquersw@gmail.com, toke@redhat.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
	jiri@resnulli.us, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
	yepeilin.cs@gmail.com, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 07/11] bpf: net_sched: Allow more optional operators in Qdisc_ops
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 17:20:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5ffa6da-b58e-4b83-961e-23d730eb5f25@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMB2axNNmoGAE8DBULe8Pjd3jtc=Tt4xKCyamPwqtB8fT5j75A@mail.gmail.com>

On 7/26/24 3:30 PM, Amery Hung wrote:
>> The pre/post is mainly to initialize and cleanup the "struct bpf_sched_data"
>> before/after calling the bpf prog.
>>
>> For the pre (init), there is a ".gen_prologue(...., const struct bpf_prog
>> *prog)" in the "bpf_verifier_ops". Take a look at the tc_cls_act_prologue().
>> It calls a BPF_FUNC_skb_pull_data helper. It potentially can call a kfunc
>> bpf_qdisc_watchdog_cancel. However, the gen_prologue is invoked too late in the
>> verifier for kfunc calling now. This will need some thoughts and works.
>>
>> For the post (destroy,reset), there is no "gen_epilogue" now. If
>> bpf_qdisc_watchdog_schedule() is not allowed to be called in the ".reset" and
>> ".destroy" bpf prog. I think it can be changed to pre also? There is a ".filter"
>> function in the "struct btf_kfunc_id_set" during the kfunc register.
>>
> I can see how that would work. The ability to add prologue, epilogue
> to struct_ops operators is one thing on my wish list.
> 
> Meanwhile, I am not sure whether that should be written in the kernel
> or rewritten by the verifier. An argument for keeping it in the kernel
> is that the prologue or epilogue can get quite complex and involves
> many kernel structures not exposed to the bpf program (pre-defined ops
> in Qdisc_ops in v8).

Can the v8 pre-defined ops be called as a kfunc? The qdisc_watchdog_cancel/init 
in v9 could be a kfunc and called by pro/epilogue.

For checking and/or resetting skb->dev, it should be simple enough without 
kfunc. e.g. when reusing the skb->rbnode in the future followup effort.

[ Unrelated to qdisc. bpf_tcp_ca can also use help to ensure the cwnd is sane. ]

> 
> Maybe we can keep the current approach in the initial version as they
> are not in the fast path, and then move to (gen_prologue,
> gen_epilogue) once the plumbing is done?

Sure. It can be improved when things are ready.

I am trying some ideas on how to do gen_epilogue and will share when I get some 
tests working.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-30  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-14 17:51 [RFC PATCH v9 00/11] bpf qdisc Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 01/11] bpf: Support getting referenced kptr from struct_ops argument Amery Hung
2024-07-24  0:32   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-24 17:00     ` Amery Hung
2024-07-25  1:28       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 02/11] selftests/bpf: Test referenced kptr arguments of struct_ops programs Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 03/11] bpf: Allow struct_ops prog to return referenced kptr Amery Hung
2024-07-24  5:36   ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-07-24 18:27     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-07-24 20:44     ` Amery Hung
2024-07-26 18:22       ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-07-26 22:45         ` Amery Hung
2024-07-24 23:57   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 04/11] selftests/bpf: Test returning referenced kptr from struct_ops programs Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 05/11] bpf: net_sched: Support implementation of Qdisc_ops in bpf Amery Hung
2024-07-18  0:00   ` Amery Hung
2024-07-25 21:24   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-31  4:09     ` Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 06/11] bpf: net_sched: Add bpf qdisc kfuncs Amery Hung
2024-07-25 22:38   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-31  4:08     ` Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 07/11] bpf: net_sched: Allow more optional operators in Qdisc_ops Amery Hung
2024-07-18  0:01   ` Amery Hung
2024-07-26  1:15   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-26 18:30     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-26 22:30     ` Amery Hung
2024-07-30  0:20       ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 08/11] libbpf: Support creating and destroying qdisc Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 09/11] selftests: Add a basic fifo qdisc test Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 10/11] selftests: Add a bpf fq qdisc to selftest Amery Hung
2024-07-19  1:54   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-19 18:20     ` Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 11/11] selftests: Add a bpf netem " Amery Hung
2024-07-17 10:13 ` [RFC PATCH v9 00/11] bpf qdisc Donald Hunter
2024-07-17 22:04   ` Amery Hung
2024-07-19 17:21 ` [OFFLIST RFC 1/4] bpf: Search for kptrs in prog BTF structs Amery Hung
2024-07-19 17:21   ` [OFFLIST RFC 2/4] bpf: Rename ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR -> ARG_KPTR_XCHG_DEST Amery Hung
2024-07-19 17:21   ` [OFFLIST RFC 3/4] bpf: Support bpf_kptr_xchg into local kptr Amery Hung
2024-07-23  0:18     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-24  0:08       ` Amery Hung
2024-07-19 17:21   ` [OFFLIST RFC 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_kptr_xchg stashing " Amery Hung
2024-07-23  0:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 00/11] bpf qdisc Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a5ffa6da-b58e-4b83-961e-23d730eb5f25@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=yangpeihao@sjtu.edu.cn \
    --cc=yepeilin.cs@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).