From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
yangpeihao@sjtu.edu.cn, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, martin.lau@kernel.org,
sinquersw@gmail.com, toke@redhat.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
jiri@resnulli.us, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
yepeilin.cs@gmail.com, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 07/11] bpf: net_sched: Allow more optional operators in Qdisc_ops
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 17:20:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5ffa6da-b58e-4b83-961e-23d730eb5f25@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMB2axNNmoGAE8DBULe8Pjd3jtc=Tt4xKCyamPwqtB8fT5j75A@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/26/24 3:30 PM, Amery Hung wrote:
>> The pre/post is mainly to initialize and cleanup the "struct bpf_sched_data"
>> before/after calling the bpf prog.
>>
>> For the pre (init), there is a ".gen_prologue(...., const struct bpf_prog
>> *prog)" in the "bpf_verifier_ops". Take a look at the tc_cls_act_prologue().
>> It calls a BPF_FUNC_skb_pull_data helper. It potentially can call a kfunc
>> bpf_qdisc_watchdog_cancel. However, the gen_prologue is invoked too late in the
>> verifier for kfunc calling now. This will need some thoughts and works.
>>
>> For the post (destroy,reset), there is no "gen_epilogue" now. If
>> bpf_qdisc_watchdog_schedule() is not allowed to be called in the ".reset" and
>> ".destroy" bpf prog. I think it can be changed to pre also? There is a ".filter"
>> function in the "struct btf_kfunc_id_set" during the kfunc register.
>>
> I can see how that would work. The ability to add prologue, epilogue
> to struct_ops operators is one thing on my wish list.
>
> Meanwhile, I am not sure whether that should be written in the kernel
> or rewritten by the verifier. An argument for keeping it in the kernel
> is that the prologue or epilogue can get quite complex and involves
> many kernel structures not exposed to the bpf program (pre-defined ops
> in Qdisc_ops in v8).
Can the v8 pre-defined ops be called as a kfunc? The qdisc_watchdog_cancel/init
in v9 could be a kfunc and called by pro/epilogue.
For checking and/or resetting skb->dev, it should be simple enough without
kfunc. e.g. when reusing the skb->rbnode in the future followup effort.
[ Unrelated to qdisc. bpf_tcp_ca can also use help to ensure the cwnd is sane. ]
>
> Maybe we can keep the current approach in the initial version as they
> are not in the fast path, and then move to (gen_prologue,
> gen_epilogue) once the plumbing is done?
Sure. It can be improved when things are ready.
I am trying some ideas on how to do gen_epilogue and will share when I get some
tests working.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-30 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-14 17:51 [RFC PATCH v9 00/11] bpf qdisc Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 01/11] bpf: Support getting referenced kptr from struct_ops argument Amery Hung
2024-07-24 0:32 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-24 17:00 ` Amery Hung
2024-07-25 1:28 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 02/11] selftests/bpf: Test referenced kptr arguments of struct_ops programs Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 03/11] bpf: Allow struct_ops prog to return referenced kptr Amery Hung
2024-07-24 5:36 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-07-24 18:27 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-07-24 20:44 ` Amery Hung
2024-07-26 18:22 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-07-26 22:45 ` Amery Hung
2024-07-24 23:57 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 04/11] selftests/bpf: Test returning referenced kptr from struct_ops programs Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 05/11] bpf: net_sched: Support implementation of Qdisc_ops in bpf Amery Hung
2024-07-18 0:00 ` Amery Hung
2024-07-25 21:24 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-31 4:09 ` Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 06/11] bpf: net_sched: Add bpf qdisc kfuncs Amery Hung
2024-07-25 22:38 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-31 4:08 ` Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 07/11] bpf: net_sched: Allow more optional operators in Qdisc_ops Amery Hung
2024-07-18 0:01 ` Amery Hung
2024-07-26 1:15 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-26 18:30 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-26 22:30 ` Amery Hung
2024-07-30 0:20 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 08/11] libbpf: Support creating and destroying qdisc Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 09/11] selftests: Add a basic fifo qdisc test Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 10/11] selftests: Add a bpf fq qdisc to selftest Amery Hung
2024-07-19 1:54 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-19 18:20 ` Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 11/11] selftests: Add a bpf netem " Amery Hung
2024-07-17 10:13 ` [RFC PATCH v9 00/11] bpf qdisc Donald Hunter
2024-07-17 22:04 ` Amery Hung
2024-07-19 17:21 ` [OFFLIST RFC 1/4] bpf: Search for kptrs in prog BTF structs Amery Hung
2024-07-19 17:21 ` [OFFLIST RFC 2/4] bpf: Rename ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR -> ARG_KPTR_XCHG_DEST Amery Hung
2024-07-19 17:21 ` [OFFLIST RFC 3/4] bpf: Support bpf_kptr_xchg into local kptr Amery Hung
2024-07-23 0:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-24 0:08 ` Amery Hung
2024-07-19 17:21 ` [OFFLIST RFC 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_kptr_xchg stashing " Amery Hung
2024-07-23 0:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 00/11] bpf qdisc Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a5ffa6da-b58e-4b83-961e-23d730eb5f25@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=yangpeihao@sjtu.edu.cn \
--cc=yepeilin.cs@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).