From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 289941E8836 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 19:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767813542; cv=none; b=rRtFRbpItkParFJyOumUwhOMiVNd0mMvfWdjSsWYfyCVLT6t8sBwWgpx9x8cTl+WW5S7Uts1B4BafHsiqj7waYL0VQUvS3JVi/f+ocuMbBeuNwduQsDNj5GbiR/Dpml2sPVHrrvVhK7YQkYiPgMhFIQnSHQIEGJVpQsCK0R7tKI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767813542; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AOOTaG75tXOSFy0fLlr4dh64FBF9PIAEmKtW63xZjaM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Eii+KvtUiuijd/7UNpNpB07JWzaKfkb4qkJ0Y9GEDB5qso89LGsvEkQ6udO/EU9JNj/nz+a3ETjob014zsDljlcLDdg0qTCfwVS47OFnRL6VtEopUeur26Mx3ByWgDExZHsJioEHDwj3pljJw4H3eVztWyh/baStVvwfhg1lhvQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=I5tqsPXy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="I5tqsPXy" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1767813540; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9pxrqf2DimCieH5/QjqTLBagNfiMSAzmWGVySseqiyw=; b=I5tqsPXygYPEDnCyWnknK3yESWq4rL5pETa9uGMW8E5dWqUHFdrgF+holQHahCkCZ7FKC9 /c5JQfOCTH6JpWSDNd9M+/Yp9oaCKwASVSpmJ5x+9Zh5pcBwbgY7b9+f42SG1GTdBeJKy+ 3NYbtF13IPTwfsVq+9fdD8gfEyGD5NA= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-674-T6FdbYucOEiCRwE8RBAcwQ-1; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 14:18:56 -0500 X-MC-Unique: T6FdbYucOEiCRwE8RBAcwQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: T6FdbYucOEiCRwE8RBAcwQ_1767813533 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8660018002CC; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 19:18:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.44.32.248] (unknown [10.44.32.248]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD79C19560A2; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 19:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 20:18:42 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: ethernet-controller: Add DPLL pin properties To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Rob Herring , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Vadim Fedorenko , Arkadiusz Kubalewski , Grzegorz Nitka , Jiri Pirko , Petr Oros , Michal Schmidt , Prathosh Satish , Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel , Saeed Mahameed , Leon Romanovsky , Tariq Toukan , Mark Bloch , Richard Cochran , Jonathan Lemon , Simon Horman , Alexander Lobakin , Willem de Bruijn , Stefan Wahren , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Horatiu Vultur References: <20251211194756.234043-1-ivecera@redhat.com> <20251211194756.234043-2-ivecera@redhat.com> <2de556f0-d7db-47f1-a59e-197f92f93d46@lunn.ch> <20251217004946.GA3445804-robh@kernel.org> <5db81f5b-4f35-46e4-8fec-4298f1ac0c4e@redhat.com> <66815c08-8408-4651-b039-d47925ae125e@redhat.com> <0000750a-e08e-45c7-a039-5eb754f6e37c@lunn.ch> Content-Language: en-US From: Ivan Vecera In-Reply-To: <0000750a-e08e-45c7-a039-5eb754f6e37c@lunn.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 On 1/7/26 6:31 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>> I have no idea what makes sense for ACPI and little interest in >>> reviewing ACPI bindings. While I think the whole idea of shared >>> bindings is questionable, really it's a question of review bandwidth >>> and so far no one has stepped up to review ACPI bindings. >> >> It depends... shared bindings allow drivers to read property values >> without need to have separate OF and ACPI codepaths. > > Do you have real hardware in your hands using ACPI? > Yes, it is based on Intel GNR-D platform with 8 NIC ports and Microchip DPLL chip on the board. I.