From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Carsten Otte <cotte-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
lguest-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Shirley Ma <xma-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
habanero-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org,
Heiko Carstens
<heiko.carstens-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
virtualization-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
steved-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
Christian Borntraeger
<borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Tom Lendacky
<tahm-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux390-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 RFC 3/4] virtio_net: limit xmit polling
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:43:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a80199422de16ae355e56ee1b2abc9b2bf91a7f6.1307029009.git.mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1307029008.git.mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Current code might introduce a lot of latency variation
if there are many pending bufs at the time we
attempt to transmit a new one. This is bad for
real-time applications and can't be good for TCP either.
Free up just enough to both clean up all buffers
eventually and to be able to xmit the next packet.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index a0ee78d..b25db1c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -509,17 +509,33 @@ again:
return received;
}
-static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+static bool free_old_xmit_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
unsigned int len;
- while ((skb = virtqueue_get_buf(vi->svq, &len)) != NULL) {
- pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
- vi->dev->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
- vi->dev->stats.tx_packets++;
- dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
- }
+ skb = virtqueue_get_buf(vi->svq, &len);
+ if (unlikely(!skb))
+ return false;
+ pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
+ vi->dev->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
+ vi->dev->stats.tx_packets++;
+ dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+ return true;
+}
+
+/* Check capacity and try to free enough pending old buffers to enable queueing
+ * new ones. Return true if we can guarantee that a following
+ * virtqueue_add_buf will succeed. */
+static bool free_xmit_capacity(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+ unsigned int len;
+
+ while (virtqueue_min_capacity(vi->svq) < MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2)
+ if (unlikely(!free_old_xmit_skb))
+ return false;
+ return true;
}
static int xmit_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -572,30 +588,34 @@ static int xmit_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct sk_buff *skb)
static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
{
struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
- int capacity;
-
- /* Free up any pending old buffers before queueing new ones. */
- free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
-
- /* Try to transmit */
- capacity = xmit_skb(vi, skb);
-
- /* This can happen with OOM and indirect buffers. */
- if (unlikely(capacity < 0)) {
- if (net_ratelimit()) {
- if (likely(capacity == -ENOMEM)) {
- dev_warn(&dev->dev,
- "TX queue failure: out of memory\n");
- } else {
- dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
+ int ret, i;
+
+ /* We normally do have space in the ring, so try to queue the skb as
+ * fast as possible. */
+ ret = xmit_skb(vi, skb);
+ if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
+ /* This triggers on the first xmit after ring full condition.
+ * We need to free up some skbs first. */
+ if (likely(free_xmit_capacity(vi))) {
+ ret = xmit_skb(vi, skb);
+ /* This should never fail. Check, just in case. */
+ if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
dev_warn(&dev->dev,
"Unexpected TX queue failure: %d\n",
- capacity);
+ ret);
+ dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
+ dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
+ } else {
+ /* Ring full: it might happen if we get a callback while
+ * the queue is still mostly full. This should be
+ * extremely rare. */
+ dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ goto stop;
}
- dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
- kfree_skb(skb);
- return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
virtqueue_kick(vi->svq);
@@ -603,18 +623,26 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
skb_orphan(skb);
nf_reset(skb);
- /* Apparently nice girls don't return TX_BUSY; stop the queue
- * before it gets out of hand. Naturally, this wastes entries. */
- if (capacity < 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
- netif_stop_queue(dev);
- if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(vi->svq))) {
- /* More just got used, free them then recheck. */
- free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
- capacity = virtqueue_min_capacity(vi->svq);
- if (capacity >= 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
- netif_start_queue(dev);
- virtqueue_disable_cb(vi->svq);
- }
+ /* We transmit one skb, so try to free at least two pending skbs.
+ * This is so that we don't hog the skb memory unnecessarily. *
+ * Doing this after kick means there's a chance we'll free
+ * the skb we have just sent, which is hot in cache. */
+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
+ free_old_xmit_skb(v);
+
+ if (likely(free_xmit_capacity(vi)))
+ return NETDEV_TX_OK;
+
+stop:
+ /* Apparently nice girls don't return TX_BUSY; check capacity and stop
+ * the queue before it gets out of hand.
+ * Naturally, this wastes entries. */
+ netif_stop_queue(dev);
+ if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(vi->svq))) {
+ /* More just got used, free them and recheck. */
+ if (free_xmit_capacity(vi)) {
+ netif_start_queue(dev);
+ virtqueue_disable_cb(vi->svq);
}
}
--
1.7.5.53.gc233e
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-02 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-02 15:42 [PATCHv2 RFC 0/4] virtio and vhost-net capacity handling Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <cover.1307029008.git.mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-02 15:42 ` [PATCHv2 RFC 1/4] virtio_ring: add capacity check API Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:43 ` [PATCHv2 RFC 2/4] virtio_net: fix tx capacity checks using new API Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-06-02 18:09 ` [PATCHv2 RFC 3/4] virtio_net: limit xmit polling Sridhar Samudrala
[not found] ` <1307038193.2321.38.camel-gzECXbv5Qf5llG67XfQwVQGz3MnDiSnoQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-02 19:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <a80199422de16ae355e56ee1b2abc9b2bf91a7f6.1307029009.git.mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-07 15:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:43 ` [PATCHv2 RFC 4/4] Revert "virtio: make add_buf return capacity remaining: Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <7572d6fb81181e349af4a8b203ea0977f6e91ae1.1307029009.git.mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-07 15:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-08 0:19 ` Rusty Russell
2011-06-02 17:17 ` [PATCHv2 RFC 0/4] virtio and vhost-net capacity handling Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20110602171721.GA13215-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-06 3:39 ` Rusty Russell
2011-06-07 16:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-13 13:32 ` Krishna Kumar2
[not found] ` <OFE36F9C2B.43D9DB04-ON652578AE.0048E1AB-652578AE.004A1462-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-13 13:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20110613133513.GA29884-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-13 13:44 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-06-13 13:38 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-06-19 8:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a80199422de16ae355e56ee1b2abc9b2bf91a7f6.1307029009.git.mst@redhat.com \
--to=mst-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cotte-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=habanero-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=krkumar2-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lguest-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux390-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=schwidefsky-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=steved-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tahm-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=virtualization-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xma-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).