From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-185.mta0.migadu.com (out-185.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD9E419D092; Sat, 9 May 2026 01:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.185 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778289258; cv=none; b=CW3Nm7MJWJLBEAD5LCV8vVcn64p2y9od+QU4q6AktMoBxZ1KWAPquCove0ZEr1j/WHhZ4aNL3u6iSJlRXyzgYlWtEZKJEA8VdV7x7fNdwbemK5frixETWkPNlUvv/ZsZwzfHCLOo8Ou5PL29H2+NeuXy5dHX3zDrlbd0u61Wtn0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778289258; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XRHNcLq5Tj1i0M+Gmb8T2rSQFwfwqj9JUey+Y69ED9U=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=fxquXersO269kiemtQTl1sR1s+FDvo/GDW83e/ninH72mOK0RyzcOSQ9qt3S30ADpiPszHkWkZ+8tKYz1uUaomfqNSVVY0F+RtElXSC2l/rClvQgqZZq0KDPh/Sy4AZGuvVVS8IFLirfmkMBsRit0e7jgJckjoEUoFzGen75xog= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=ivtK7cwN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.185 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="ivtK7cwN" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1778289253; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qQf4QhBnU6nphvM2y/gxe0oUuO7UtOdH2zT46D3ROV0=; b=ivtK7cwN6Gmt/Rw7yU22E5yzq1ad9CHhMzTs9ST6/KJ+AyoI3d1FJLGxfw4cuVZjdYR7n+ OsydfGIebDbj8s7wUYItWwxR1yxLAfOL09hQ6qUkEdErLagCIXmHMfrGBZNpuu0BfORitG /8H4UINJ+seuBn13D7GknZKgIuovGZ4= Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 09:13:58 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: add tests for PPPoL2TP To: Felix Maurer Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Shuah Khan , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Petr Machata , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org References: <20260508032158.67887-1-qingfang.deng@linux.dev> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Qingfang Deng In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 2026/5/9 1:26, Felix Maurer wrote: > Is there a particular reason to create the test setup with a netkit pair > instead of the more standard veth pairs? L2TP does not need an outer ethernet header so I choose netkit instead of veth.