netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Alexander H Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phylink: fix suspend/resume with WoL enabled and link down
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:35:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAERy1qnTyTGT-_w@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9910f0885c4ee48878569d3e286072228088137a.camel@gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 07:30:05AM -0700, Alexander H Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-04-16 at 17:16 +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > When WoL is enabled, we update the software state in phylink to
> > indicate that the link is down, and disable the resolver from
> > bringing the link back up.
> > 
> > On resume, we attempt to bring the overall state into consistency
> > by calling the .mac_link_down() method, but this is wrong if the
> > link was already down, as phylink strictly orders the .mac_link_up()
> > and .mac_link_down() methods - and this would break that ordering.
> > 
> > Fixes: f97493657c63 ("net: phylink: add suspend/resume support")
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> > ---
> > 
> > To fix the suspend/resume with link down, this is what I think we
> > should do. Untested at the moment.
> > 
> >  drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> > index 69ca765485db..d2c59ee16ebc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ struct phylink {
> >  	unsigned int pcs_state;
> >  
> >  	bool link_failed;
> > +	bool suspend_link_up;
> >  	bool major_config_failed;
> >  	bool mac_supports_eee_ops;
> >  	bool mac_supports_eee;
> 
> I'm pretty sure this extra bit of state isn't needed.
> 
> > @@ -2545,14 +2546,16 @@ void phylink_suspend(struct phylink *pl, bool mac_wol)
> >  		/* Stop the resolver bringing the link up */
> >  		__set_bit(PHYLINK_DISABLE_MAC_WOL, &pl->phylink_disable_state);
> >  
> > -		/* Disable the carrier, to prevent transmit timeouts,
> > -		 * but one would hope all packets have been sent. This
> > -		 * also means phylink_resolve() will do nothing.
> > -		 */
> > -		if (pl->netdev)
> > -			netif_carrier_off(pl->netdev);
> > -		else
> 
> This is the only spot where we weren't setting netif_carrier_on/off and
> old_link_state together. I suspect you could just carry old_link_state
> without needing to add a new argument. Basically you would just need to
> drop the "else" portion of this statement.
> 
> In the grand scheme of things with the exception of this one spot
> old_link_state is essentially the actual MAC/PCS link state whereas
> netif_carrier_off is the administrative state.

Sorry to say, but you have that wrong. Neither are the administrative
state.

> > +		pl->suspend_link_up = phylink_link_is_up(pl);
> > +		if (pl->suspend_link_up) {
> > +			/* Disable the carrier, to prevent transmit timeouts,
> > +			 * but one would hope all packets have been sent. This
> > +			 * also means phylink_resolve() will do nothing.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (pl->netdev)
> > +				netif_carrier_off(pl->netdev);
> >  			pl->old_link_state = false;
> > +		}
> >  
> >  		/* We do not call mac_link_down() here as we want the
> >  		 * link to remain up to receive the WoL packets.
> > @@ -2603,15 +2606,18 @@ void phylink_resume(struct phylink *pl)
> >  	if (test_bit(PHYLINK_DISABLE_MAC_WOL, &pl->phylink_disable_state)) {
> >  		/* Wake-on-Lan enabled, MAC handling */
> >  
> > -		/* Call mac_link_down() so we keep the overall state balanced.
> > -		 * Do this under the state_mutex lock for consistency. This
> > -		 * will cause a "Link Down" message to be printed during
> > -		 * resume, which is harmless - the true link state will be
> > -		 * printed when we run a resolve.
> > -		 */
> > -		mutex_lock(&pl->state_mutex);
> > -		phylink_link_down(pl);
> > -		mutex_unlock(&pl->state_mutex);
> > +		if (pl->suspend_link_up) {
> > +			/* Call mac_link_down() so we keep the overall state
> > +			 * balanced. Do this under the state_mutex lock for
> > +			 * consistency. This will cause a "Link Down" message
> > +			 * to be printed during resume, which is harmless -
> > +			 * the true link state will be printed when we run a
> > +			 * resolve.
> > +			 */
> > +			mutex_lock(&pl->state_mutex);
> > +			phylink_link_down(pl);
> > +			mutex_unlock(&pl->state_mutex);
> > +		}
> 
> You should be able to do all of this with just old_link_state. The only
> thing that would have to change is that you would need to set
> old_link_state to false after the if statement.

Nope.

> I'm assuming part of the reason for forcing the link down here also has
> to do with the fact that you are using phylink_mac_initial_config which
> calls phylink_major_config after this?

Another of phylink's guarantees is that it won't do the mac_config()
etc with the link up. So, in order to ensure that everything is
correctly programmed after resume, it needs mac_config() etc called
which means the link needs to come down first.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-17 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-16 15:28 [net-next PATCH 0/2] net: phylink: Fix issue w/ BMC link flap Alexander Duyck
2025-04-16 15:28 ` [net-next PATCH 1/2] net: phylink: Drop unused defines for SUPPORTED/ADVERTISED_INTERFACES Alexander Duyck
2025-04-22  8:32   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-16 15:29 ` [net-next PATCH 2/2] net: phylink: Fix issues with link balancing w/ BMC present Alexander Duyck
2025-04-16 16:01   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-16 16:16     ` [PATCH net] net: phylink: fix suspend/resume with WoL enabled and link down Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-16 17:14       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-17 14:30       ` Alexander H Duyck
2025-04-17 14:35         ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2025-04-17 15:23           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-17 17:06             ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-17 17:27               ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-17 19:49                 ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-22  9:51                   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-22 15:30                     ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-22 16:00                       ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-22 20:09                         ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-23  0:00       ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-04-16 17:12     ` [net-next PATCH 2/2] net: phylink: Fix issues with link balancing w/ BMC present Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-16 19:03     ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-16 19:19       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-16 20:05         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-16 22:58           ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-19 18:11 ` [net-next PATCH 0/2] net: phylink: Fix issue w/ BMC link flap Andrew Lunn
2025-04-20 18:18   ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-20 21:58     ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-21 15:51       ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-21 16:50         ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-22  1:21           ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-22 13:49             ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-22 15:28               ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-22 16:49                 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-22 17:30                   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-22 18:13                     ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-22 18:50                       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-22 23:51                       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-22 21:29                   ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-22 22:26                     ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-22 23:06                       ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-23 18:38                         ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-24 20:34                         ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-24 23:40                           ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-25 13:11                             ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-25 15:41                               ` Alexander Duyck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aAERy1qnTyTGT-_w@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).