From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, jeroendb@google.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, willemb@google.com, ziweixiao@google.com,
pkaligineedi@google.com, yyd@google.com, joshwash@google.com,
shailend@google.com, linux@treblig.org, thostet@google.com,
jfraker@google.com, horms@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/6] gve: Add rx hardware timestamp expansion
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 18:21:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAhAoxmUSCQkq979@LQ3V64L9R2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250418221254.112433-5-hramamurthy@google.com>
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:12:52PM +0000, Harshitha Ramamurthy wrote:
> From: John Fraker <jfraker@google.com>
>
> Allow the rx path to recover the high 32 bits of the full 64 bit rx
> timestamp.
>
> Use the low 32 bits of the last synced nic time and the 32 bits of the
> timestamp provided in the rx descriptor to generate a difference, which
> is then applied to the last synced nic time to reconstruct the complete
> 64-bit timestamp.
>
> This scheme remains accurate as long as no more than ~2 seconds have
> passed between the last read of the nic clock and the timestamping
> application of the received packet.
>
> Co-developed-by: Ziwei Xiao <ziweixiao@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ziwei Xiao <ziweixiao@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Fraker <jfraker@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_rx_dqo.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_rx_dqo.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_rx_dqo.c
> index dcb0545baa50..483d188d33ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_rx_dqo.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_rx_dqo.c
> @@ -437,6 +437,29 @@ static void gve_rx_skb_hash(struct sk_buff *skb,
> skb_set_hash(skb, le32_to_cpu(compl_desc->hash), hash_type);
> }
>
> +/* Expand the hardware timestamp to the full 64 bits of width, and add it to the
> + * skb.
> + *
> + * This algorithm works by using the passed hardware timestamp to generate a
> + * diff relative to the last read of the nic clock. This diff can be positive or
> + * negative, as it is possible that we have read the clock more recently than
> + * the hardware has received this packet. To detect this, we use the high bit of
> + * the diff, and assume that the read is more recent if the high bit is set. In
> + * this case we invert the process.
> + *
> + * Note that this means if the time delta between packet reception and the last
> + * clock read is greater than ~2 seconds, this will provide invalid results.
> + */
> +static void __maybe_unused gve_rx_skb_hwtstamp(struct gve_rx_ring *rx, u32 hwts)
> +{
> + s64 last_read = rx->gve->last_sync_nic_counter;
Does this need a READ_ONCE to match the WRITE_ONCE in the previous
patch ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-18 22:12 [PATCH net-next 0/6] gve: Add Rx HW timestamping support Harshitha Ramamurthy
2025-04-18 22:12 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] gve: Add device option for nic clock synchronization Harshitha Ramamurthy
2025-04-23 1:42 ` Joe Damato
2025-04-18 22:12 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] gve: Add adminq command to report nic timestamp Harshitha Ramamurthy
2025-04-23 1:44 ` Joe Damato
2025-04-18 22:12 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] gve: Add initial gve_clock Harshitha Ramamurthy
2025-04-23 1:49 ` Joe Damato
2025-04-18 22:12 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] gve: Add rx hardware timestamp expansion Harshitha Ramamurthy
2025-04-23 1:21 ` Joe Damato [this message]
2025-04-24 18:40 ` Ziwei Xiao
2025-04-18 22:12 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] gve: Add support for SIOC[GS]HWTSTAMP IOCTLs Harshitha Ramamurthy
2025-04-23 1:52 ` Joe Damato
2025-04-18 22:12 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] gve: Advertise support for rx hardware timestamping Harshitha Ramamurthy
2025-04-23 1:53 ` Joe Damato
2025-04-23 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] gve: Add Rx HW timestamping support Vadim Fedorenko
2025-04-23 20:46 ` Ziwei Xiao
2025-04-23 21:06 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-04-23 22:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-24 18:39 ` Ziwei Xiao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAhAoxmUSCQkq979@LQ3V64L9R2 \
--to=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=hramamurthy@google.com \
--cc=jeroendb@google.com \
--cc=jfraker@google.com \
--cc=joshwash@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@treblig.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pkaligineedi@google.com \
--cc=shailend@google.com \
--cc=thostet@google.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yyd@google.com \
--cc=ziweixiao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox