From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vlad Dogaru <vdogaru@nvidia.com>,
Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/5] net/mlx5e: Use custom tunnel header for vxlan gbp
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:34:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAjCIE/DMAlLZXGA@mev-dev.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423083611.324567-2-mbloch@nvidia.com>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 11:36:07AM +0300, Mark Bloch wrote:
> From: Vlad Dogaru <vdogaru@nvidia.com>
>
> Symbolic (e.g. "vxlan") and custom (e.g. "tunnel_header_0") tunnels
> cannot be combined, but the match params interface does not have fields
> for matching on vxlan gbp. To match vxlan bgp, the tc_tun layer uses
> tunnel_header_0.
>
> Allow matching on both VNI and GBP by matching the VNI with a custom
> tunnel header instead of the symbolic field name.
>
> Matching solely on the VNI continues to use the symbolic field name.
>
> Fixes: 74a778b4a63f ("net/mlx5: HWS, added definers handling")
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Dogaru <vdogaru@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
> ---
> .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_vxlan.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_vxlan.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_vxlan.c
> index 5c762a71818d..7a18a469961d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_vxlan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_vxlan.c
> @@ -165,9 +165,6 @@ static int mlx5e_tc_tun_parse_vxlan(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> struct flow_match_enc_keyid enc_keyid;
> void *misc_c, *misc_v;
>
> - misc_c = MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, spec->match_criteria, misc_parameters);
> - misc_v = MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, spec->match_value, misc_parameters);
> -
> if (!flow_rule_match_key(rule, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_KEYID))
> return 0;
>
> @@ -182,6 +179,30 @@ static int mlx5e_tc_tun_parse_vxlan(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> err = mlx5e_tc_tun_parse_vxlan_gbp_option(priv, spec, f);
> if (err)
> return err;
> +
> + /* We can't mix custom tunnel headers with symbolic ones and we
> + * don't have a symbolic field name for GBP, so we use custom
> + * tunnel headers in this case. We need hardware support to
> + * match on custom tunnel headers, but we already know it's
> + * supported because the previous call successfully checked for
> + * that.
> + */
> + misc_c = MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, spec->match_criteria,
> + misc_parameters_5);
> + misc_v = MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, spec->match_value,
> + misc_parameters_5);
> +
> + /* Shift by 8 to account for the reserved bits in the vxlan
> + * header after the VNI.
> + */
> + MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc5, misc_c, tunnel_header_1,
> + be32_to_cpu(enc_keyid.mask->keyid) << 8);
> + MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc5, misc_v, tunnel_header_1,
> + be32_to_cpu(enc_keyid.key->keyid) << 8);
> +
> + spec->match_criteria_enable |= MLX5_MATCH_MISC_PARAMETERS_5;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /* match on VNI is required */
> @@ -195,6 +216,11 @@ static int mlx5e_tc_tun_parse_vxlan(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
>
> + misc_c = MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, spec->match_criteria,
> + misc_parameters);
> + misc_v = MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, spec->match_value,
> + misc_parameters);
> +
> MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc, misc_c, vxlan_vni,
> be32_to_cpu(enc_keyid.mask->keyid));
> MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc, misc_v, vxlan_vni,
Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
> --
> 2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 8:36 [PATCH net 0/5] mlx5 misc fixes 2025-04-23 Mark Bloch
2025-04-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net 1/5] net/mlx5e: Use custom tunnel header for vxlan gbp Mark Bloch
2025-04-23 10:34 ` Michal Swiatkowski [this message]
2025-04-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net 2/5] net/mlx5: E-Switch, Initialize MAC Address for Default GID Mark Bloch
2025-04-23 10:31 ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-04-23 11:20 ` Mark Bloch
2025-04-23 12:00 ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-04-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net 3/5] net/mlx5e: TC, Continue the attr process even if encap entry is invalid Mark Bloch
2025-04-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net 4/5] net/mlx5e: Fix lock order in mlx5e_tx_reporter_ptpsq_unhealthy_recover Mark Bloch
2025-04-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net 5/5] net/mlx5: E-switch, Fix error handling for enabling roce Mark Bloch
2025-04-23 10:17 ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-04-25 19:01 ` [PATCH net 0/5] mlx5 misc fixes 2025-04-23 patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAjCIE/DMAlLZXGA@mev-dev.igk.intel.com \
--to=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kliteyn@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=vdogaru@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).