From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>
To: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net/devmem: Reject insufficiently large dmabuf pools
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 09:53:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAka_v_uBV9UIwFO@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423153504.1085434-1-cratiu@nvidia.com>
On 04/23, Cosmin Ratiu wrote:
> Drivers that are told to allocate RX buffers from pools of DMA memory
> should have enough memory in the pool to satisfy projected allocation
> requests (a function of ring size, MTU & other parameters). If there's
> not enough memory, RX ring refill might fail later at inconvenient times
> (e.g. during NAPI poll).
>
> This commit adds a check at dmabuf pool init time that compares the
> amount of memory in the underlying chunk pool (configured by the user
> space application providing dmabuf memory) with the desired pool size
> (previously set by the driver) and fails with an error message if chunk
> memory isn't enough.
>
> Fixes: 0f9214046893 ("memory-provider: dmabuf devmem memory provider")
> Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
> ---
> net/core/devmem.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/devmem.c b/net/core/devmem.c
> index 6e27a47d0493..651cd55ebb28 100644
> --- a/net/core/devmem.c
> +++ b/net/core/devmem.c
> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int dmabuf_fd,
> int mp_dmabuf_devmem_init(struct page_pool *pool)
> {
> struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding = pool->mp_priv;
> + size_t size;
>
> if (!binding)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -312,6 +313,16 @@ int mp_dmabuf_devmem_init(struct page_pool *pool)
> if (pool->p.order != 0)
> return -E2BIG;
>
> + /* Validate that the underlying dmabuf has enough memory to satisfy
> + * requested pool size.
> + */
I think it's useful to have a check, but note that this check is in no
way a guarantee that the genpool has enough capacity. We can use the
same binding on multiple queues... Can you expand the comment a bit
to explain that it's more of a sanity check than a guarantee?
> + size = gen_pool_size(binding->chunk_pool) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + if (size < pool->p.pool_size) {
> + pr_warn("%s: Insufficient dmabuf memory (%zu pages) to satisfy pool_size (%u pages)\n",
Let's print the sizes in bytes? We might have order>0 pages soon in the
pp: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250421222827.283737-1-kuba@kernel.org/T/#t
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 15:35 [PATCH net 1/2] net/devmem: Reject insufficiently large dmabuf pools Cosmin Ratiu
2025-04-23 15:35 ` [PATCH net 2/2] tests/ncdevmem: Fix double-free of queue array Cosmin Ratiu
2025-04-23 16:54 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-04-23 18:49 ` Mina Almasry
2025-04-23 16:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2025-04-23 17:30 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net/devmem: Reject insufficiently large dmabuf pools Mina Almasry
2025-04-23 20:15 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-04-24 20:57 ` Mina Almasry
2025-04-24 22:10 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-04-24 22:26 ` Mina Almasry
2025-04-24 22:40 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-04-24 23:42 ` Mina Almasry
2025-04-25 0:37 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-04-24 8:47 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-04-24 20:50 ` Mina Almasry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAka_v_uBV9UIwFO@mini-arch \
--to=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).