* [PATCH net] vxlan: vnifilter: Fix unlocked deletion of default FDB entry
@ 2025-04-23 14:51 Ido Schimmel
2025-04-23 14:58 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ido Schimmel @ 2025-04-23 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: davem, kuba, pabeni, edumazet, andrew+netdev, razor, petrm, roopa,
Ido Schimmel
When a VNI is deleted from a VXLAN device in 'vnifilter' mode, the FDB
entry associated with the default remote (assuming one was configured)
is deleted without holding the hash lock. This is wrong and will result
in a warning [1] being generated by the lockdep annotation that was
added by commit ebe642067455 ("vxlan: Create wrappers for FDB lookup").
Reproducer:
# ip link add vx0 up type vxlan dstport 4789 external vnifilter local 192.0.2.1
# bridge vni add vni 10010 remote 198.51.100.1 dev vx0
# bridge vni del vni 10010 dev vx0
Fix by acquiring the hash lock before the deletion and releasing it
afterwards. Blame the original commit that introduced the issue rather
than the one that exposed it.
[1]
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 392 at drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c:417 vxlan_find_mac+0x17f/0x1a0
[...]
RIP: 0010:vxlan_find_mac+0x17f/0x1a0
[...]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__vxlan_fdb_delete+0xbe/0x560
vxlan_vni_delete_group+0x2ba/0x940
vxlan_vni_del.isra.0+0x15f/0x580
vxlan_process_vni_filter+0x38b/0x7b0
vxlan_vnifilter_process+0x3bb/0x510
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x2f7/0xb70
netlink_rcv_skb+0x131/0x360
netlink_unicast+0x426/0x710
netlink_sendmsg+0x75a/0xc20
__sock_sendmsg+0xc1/0x150
____sys_sendmsg+0x5aa/0x7b0
___sys_sendmsg+0xfc/0x180
__sys_sendmsg+0x121/0x1b0
do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
Fixes: f9c4bb0b245c ("vxlan: vni filtering support on collect metadata device")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
---
I'm sorry, but I only noticed this issue after the recent VXLAN patches
were applied to net-next. There will be a conflict when merging net into
net-next, but resolution is trivial. Reference:
https://github.com/idosch/linux/commit/ed95370ec89cccbf784d5ef5ea4b6fb6fa0daf47.patch
---
drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
index 6e6e9f05509a..06d19e90eadb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
@@ -627,7 +627,11 @@ static void vxlan_vni_delete_group(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
* default dst remote_ip previously added for this vni
*/
if (!vxlan_addr_any(&vninode->remote_ip) ||
- !vxlan_addr_any(&dst->remote_ip))
+ !vxlan_addr_any(&dst->remote_ip)) {
+ u32 hash_index = fdb_head_index(vxlan, all_zeros_mac,
+ vninode->vni);
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&vxlan->hash_lock[hash_index]);
__vxlan_fdb_delete(vxlan, all_zeros_mac,
(vxlan_addr_any(&vninode->remote_ip) ?
dst->remote_ip : vninode->remote_ip),
@@ -635,6 +639,8 @@ static void vxlan_vni_delete_group(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
vninode->vni, vninode->vni,
dst->remote_ifindex,
true);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&vxlan->hash_lock[hash_index]);
+ }
if (vxlan->dev->flags & IFF_UP) {
if (vxlan_addr_multicast(&vninode->remote_ip) &&
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] vxlan: vnifilter: Fix unlocked deletion of default FDB entry
2025-04-23 14:51 [PATCH net] vxlan: vnifilter: Fix unlocked deletion of default FDB entry Ido Schimmel
@ 2025-04-23 14:58 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-04-23 21:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-24 18:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2025-04-23 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ido Schimmel, netdev
Cc: davem, kuba, pabeni, edumazet, andrew+netdev, petrm, roopa
On 4/23/25 17:51, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> When a VNI is deleted from a VXLAN device in 'vnifilter' mode, the FDB
> entry associated with the default remote (assuming one was configured)
> is deleted without holding the hash lock. This is wrong and will result
> in a warning [1] being generated by the lockdep annotation that was
> added by commit ebe642067455 ("vxlan: Create wrappers for FDB lookup").
>
> Reproducer:
>
> # ip link add vx0 up type vxlan dstport 4789 external vnifilter local 192.0.2.1
> # bridge vni add vni 10010 remote 198.51.100.1 dev vx0
> # bridge vni del vni 10010 dev vx0
>
> Fix by acquiring the hash lock before the deletion and releasing it
> afterwards. Blame the original commit that introduced the issue rather
> than the one that exposed it.
>
> [1]
> WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 392 at drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c:417 vxlan_find_mac+0x17f/0x1a0
> [...]
> RIP: 0010:vxlan_find_mac+0x17f/0x1a0
> [...]
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __vxlan_fdb_delete+0xbe/0x560
> vxlan_vni_delete_group+0x2ba/0x940
> vxlan_vni_del.isra.0+0x15f/0x580
> vxlan_process_vni_filter+0x38b/0x7b0
> vxlan_vnifilter_process+0x3bb/0x510
> rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x2f7/0xb70
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x131/0x360
> netlink_unicast+0x426/0x710
> netlink_sendmsg+0x75a/0xc20
> __sock_sendmsg+0xc1/0x150
> ____sys_sendmsg+0x5aa/0x7b0
> ___sys_sendmsg+0xfc/0x180
> __sys_sendmsg+0x121/0x1b0
> do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
>
> Fixes: f9c4bb0b245c ("vxlan: vni filtering support on collect metadata device")
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> ---
> I'm sorry, but I only noticed this issue after the recent VXLAN patches
> were applied to net-next. There will be a conflict when merging net into
> net-next, but resolution is trivial. Reference:
> https://github.com/idosch/linux/commit/ed95370ec89cccbf784d5ef5ea4b6fb6fa0daf47.patch
> ---
> drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Oops, yup. Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] vxlan: vnifilter: Fix unlocked deletion of default FDB entry
2025-04-23 14:51 [PATCH net] vxlan: vnifilter: Fix unlocked deletion of default FDB entry Ido Schimmel
2025-04-23 14:58 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
@ 2025-04-23 21:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-24 6:17 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-04-24 18:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2025-04-23 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ido Schimmel
Cc: netdev, davem, pabeni, edumazet, andrew+netdev, razor, petrm,
roopa
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:51:31 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I only noticed this issue after the recent VXLAN patches
> were applied to net-next. There will be a conflict when merging net into
> net-next, but resolution is trivial. Reference:
> https://github.com/idosch/linux/commit/ed95370ec89cccbf784d5ef5ea4b6fb6fa0daf47.patch
Thanks! I guess this shouldn't happen often but FWIW for conflict-less
build breakage a patch on top of the merge would be more convenient
than the net-next version of the patch. Like this:
diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
index 81d088c2f8dc..39b446a4bad7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ static void vxlan_vni_delete_group(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
u32 hash_index = fdb_head_index(vxlan, all_zeros_mac,
vninode->vni);
- spin_lock_bh(&vxlan->hash_lock[hash_index]);
+ spin_lock_bh(&vxlan->hash_lock);
__vxlan_fdb_delete(vxlan, all_zeros_mac,
(vxlan_addr_any(&vninode->remote_ip) ?
dst->remote_ip : vninode->remote_ip),
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ static void vxlan_vni_delete_group(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
vninode->vni, vninode->vni,
dst->remote_ifindex,
true);
- spin_unlock_bh(&vxlan->hash_lock[hash_index]);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&vxlan->hash_lock);
}
if (vxlan->dev->flags & IFF_UP) {
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] vxlan: vnifilter: Fix unlocked deletion of default FDB entry
2025-04-23 21:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2025-04-24 6:17 ` Ido Schimmel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ido Schimmel @ 2025-04-24 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: netdev, davem, pabeni, edumazet, andrew+netdev, razor, petrm,
roopa
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 02:29:21PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:51:31 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > I'm sorry, but I only noticed this issue after the recent VXLAN patches
> > were applied to net-next. There will be a conflict when merging net into
> > net-next, but resolution is trivial. Reference:
> > https://github.com/idosch/linux/commit/ed95370ec89cccbf784d5ef5ea4b6fb6fa0daf47.patch
>
> Thanks! I guess this shouldn't happen often but FWIW for conflict-less
> build breakage a patch on top of the merge would be more convenient
> than the net-next version of the patch. Like this:
No problem, but note that "hash_index" needs to be removed as well, so
this would be the diff:
diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
index 81d088c2f8dc..186d0660669a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
@@ -625,10 +625,7 @@ static void vxlan_vni_delete_group(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
*/
if (!vxlan_addr_any(&vninode->remote_ip) ||
!vxlan_addr_any(&dst->remote_ip)) {
- u32 hash_index = fdb_head_index(vxlan, all_zeros_mac,
- vninode->vni);
-
- spin_lock_bh(&vxlan->hash_lock[hash_index]);
+ spin_lock_bh(&vxlan->hash_lock);
__vxlan_fdb_delete(vxlan, all_zeros_mac,
(vxlan_addr_any(&vninode->remote_ip) ?
dst->remote_ip : vninode->remote_ip),
@@ -636,7 +633,7 @@ static void vxlan_vni_delete_group(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
vninode->vni, vninode->vni,
dst->remote_ifindex,
true);
- spin_unlock_bh(&vxlan->hash_lock[hash_index]);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&vxlan->hash_lock);
}
if (vxlan->dev->flags & IFF_UP) {
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] vxlan: vnifilter: Fix unlocked deletion of default FDB entry
2025-04-23 14:51 [PATCH net] vxlan: vnifilter: Fix unlocked deletion of default FDB entry Ido Schimmel
2025-04-23 14:58 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-04-23 21:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2025-04-24 18:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2025-04-24 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ido Schimmel
Cc: netdev, davem, kuba, pabeni, edumazet, andrew+netdev, razor,
petrm, roopa
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:51:31 +0300 you wrote:
> When a VNI is deleted from a VXLAN device in 'vnifilter' mode, the FDB
> entry associated with the default remote (assuming one was configured)
> is deleted without holding the hash lock. This is wrong and will result
> in a warning [1] being generated by the lockdep annotation that was
> added by commit ebe642067455 ("vxlan: Create wrappers for FDB lookup").
>
> Reproducer:
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] vxlan: vnifilter: Fix unlocked deletion of default FDB entry
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/087a9eb9e597
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-24 18:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-23 14:51 [PATCH net] vxlan: vnifilter: Fix unlocked deletion of default FDB entry Ido Schimmel
2025-04-23 14:58 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-04-23 21:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-24 6:17 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-04-24 18:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).