netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 3/4] net: phy: Don't report advertised EEE modes if EEE is disabled
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:38:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aApM3MC_FW6BSpW8@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07bd8b38-c49c-481b-b08b-fff78b9ffe98@lunn.ch>

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 04:30:40PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 03:02:21PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Currently, `ethtool --show-eee` reports "Advertised EEE link modes" even when
> > EEE is disabled, which can be misleading. For example:
> > 
> >   EEE settings for lan1:
> >           EEE status: disabled
> >           Tx LPI: disabled
> >           Supported EEE link modes:  100baseT/Full
> >                                      1000baseT/Full
> >           Advertised EEE link modes:  100baseT/Full
> >                                       1000baseT/Full
> >           Link partner advertised EEE link modes:  Not reported
> 
> What is the behaviour for normal link mode advertisement? If i turn
> autoneg off, do the advertised link modes disappear? Do they reappear
> when i turn autoneg back on again?
> 
> I would expect EEE to follow what the normal link modes do. Assuming
> the Read/modify/write does not break this.

It's difficult to compare, because ethtool is implemented differently
between modifying the link modes and the EEE stuff. ethtool -s autoneg
on uses this:

                        if (autoneg_wanted == AUTONEG_ENABLE &&
                            advertising_wanted == NULL &&
                            full_advertising_wanted == NULL) {
                                unsigned int i;

                                /* Auto negotiation enabled, but with
                                 * unspecified speed and duplex: enable all
                                 * supported speeds and duplexes.
                                 */

whereas do_seee() has no special handling.

So, if we want ethtool --set-eee eee off; ethtool --set-eee eee on *not*
to end up with the advertising mask being cleared, then we have to
preserve it, or force the advertising mask to something if the
advertising mask is empty and eee_enabled is true.

Or we preserve the advertising mask when eee_enabled is cleared, which
is what we do today.

I think, given the different implementations in ethtool, we can't just
say "we want it to be have the same" by just modifying the kernel.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-24 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-24 13:02 [PATCH net-next v1 0/4] Improve EEE control for KSZ switches and clarify ethtool output Oleksij Rempel
2025-04-24 13:02 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/4] net: dsa: user: Skip set_mac_eee() if support_eee() is implemented Oleksij Rempel
2025-04-24 13:11   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-24 13:02 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/4] net: dsa: microchip: Remove set_mac_eee() callback from KSZ driver Oleksij Rempel
2025-04-24 13:02 ` [PATCH net-next v1 3/4] net: phy: Don't report advertised EEE modes if EEE is disabled Oleksij Rempel
2025-04-24 13:14   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-24 14:30   ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-24 14:38     ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2025-04-24 13:02 ` [PATCH net-next v1 4/4] net: phy: Always read EEE LPA in genphy_c45_ethtool_get_eee() Oleksij Rempel
2025-04-24 13:16   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-24 14:34     ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-24 14:47       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-25  4:41         ` Oleksij Rempel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aApM3MC_FW6BSpW8@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).