From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
sagi@grimberg.me, willemb@google.com, almasrymina@google.com,
kaiyuanz@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: devmem: drop iterator type check
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 07:41:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCtDMJDtP0DxUBqj@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab1959f9-1b94-4e7f-ba33-12453cb50027@gmail.com>
On 05/19, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 5/16/25 23:54, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > sendmsg() with a single iov becomes ITER_UBUF, sendmsg() with multiple
> > iovs becomes ITER_IOVEC. Instead of adjusting the check to include
> > ITER_UBUF, drop the check completely. The callers are guaranteed
> > to happen from system call side and we don't need to pay runtime
> > cost to verify it.
>
> I asked for this because io_uring can pass bvecs. Only sendzc can
> pass that with cmsg, so probably you won't be able to hit any
> real issue, but io_uring needs and soon will have bvec support for
> normal sends as well. One can argue we should care as it isn't
> merged yet, but there is something very very wrong if an unrelated
> and legal io_uring change is able to open a vulnerability in the
> devmem path.
Any reason not to filter these out on the io_uring side? Or you'll
have to interpret sendmsg flags again which is not nice?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-19 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-16 22:54 [PATCH net-next] net: devmem: drop iterator type check Stanislav Fomichev
2025-05-17 4:45 ` Mina Almasry
2025-05-17 4:48 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-05-19 10:45 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-19 14:41 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2025-05-19 15:19 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-19 15:39 ` Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCtDMJDtP0DxUBqj@mini-arch \
--to=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kaiyuanz@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).