From: Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz>
To: Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>
Cc: Matt Johnston <matt@codeconstruct.com.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Peter Yin <peteryin.openbmc@gmail.com>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mctp: fix infinite data from mctp_dump_addrinfo
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 08:54:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEbZoxqFBnd0Pr32@heinlein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <575fa12e699f6f65b47f5b776ec91ef9c350644a.camel@codeconstruct.com.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1453 bytes --]
On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 03:47:09PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> [+CC Andrew, for openbmc kernel reasons]
>
> > So, it seems like there's something more subtle happening here - or I
> > have misunderstood something about the fix (I'm unsure of the
> > reference to xa_for_each_start; for_each_netdev_dump only calls xa_start?).
>
> Ah! Are you on the openbmc 6.6 backport perhaps?
>
> It look the xa_for_each_start()-implementation of netdev_for_each_dump()
> would not be compatible with a direct backport of 2d20773aec14 ("mctp: no
> longer rely on net->dev_index_head[]").
>
> This was the update for the for_each_netdev_dump() macro:
>
> commit f22b4b55edb507a2b30981e133b66b642be4d13f
> Author: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Date: Thu Jun 13 14:33:16 2024 -0700
>
> net: make for_each_netdev_dump() a little more bug-proof
>
> I find the behavior of xa_for_each_start() slightly counter-intuitive.
> It doesn't end the iteration by making the index point after the last
> element. IOW calling xa_for_each_start() again after it "finished"
> will run the body of the loop for the last valid element, instead
> of doing nothing.
>
> ... which sounds like what's happening here.
Ah, yep. That's exactly what is going on here. I guess this change
isn't needed for master and it looks like you've already requested a
revert for 6.6?
--
Patrick Williams
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-09 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-06 11:11 [PATCH] net: mctp: fix infinite data from mctp_dump_addrinfo Patrick Williams
2025-06-07 7:10 ` Jeremy Kerr
2025-06-07 7:47 ` Jeremy Kerr
2025-06-09 12:54 ` Patrick Williams [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aEbZoxqFBnd0Pr32@heinlein \
--to=patrick@stwcx.xyz \
--cc=andrew@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jk@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peteryin.openbmc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox