From: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: vinicius.gomes@intel.com, jhs@mojatatu.com, jiri@resnulli.us,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, v4bel@theori.io, imv4bel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/sched: fix use-after-free in taprio_dev_notifier
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 23:36:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEucrIuj7yxTX58y@v4bel-B760M-AORUS-ELITE-AX> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aEs3Sotbf81FShq3@pop-os.localdomain>
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 01:23:38PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 07:16:55AM -0400, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > index 14021b812329..bd2b02d1dc63 100644
> > --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> > @@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> > if (event != NETDEV_UP && event != NETDEV_CHANGE)
> > return NOTIFY_DONE;
> >
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > list_for_each_entry(q, &taprio_list, taprio_list) {
> > if (dev != qdisc_dev(q->root))
> > continue;
> > @@ -1328,16 +1329,17 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
>
> There is a taprio_set_picos_per_byte() call here, it calls
> __ethtool_get_link_ksettings() which could be blocking.
>
> For instance, gve_get_link_ksettings() calls
> gve_adminq_report_link_speed() which is a blocking function.
>
> So I am afraid we can't enforce an atomic context here.
In that case, how about moving the lock as follows so that
taprio_set_picos_per_byte() isn’t included within it?
```
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
index 14021b812329..2b14c81a87e5 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
@@ -1328,13 +1328,15 @@ static int taprio_dev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
stab = rtnl_dereference(q->root->stab);
- oper = rtnl_dereference(q->oper_sched);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ oper = rcu_dereference(q->oper_sched);
if (oper)
taprio_update_queue_max_sdu(q, oper, stab);
- admin = rtnl_dereference(q->admin_sched);
+ admin = rcu_dereference(q->admin_sched);
if (admin)
taprio_update_queue_max_sdu(q, admin, stab);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
break;
}
```
This change still prevents the race condition with advance_sched().
>
> Sorry.
> Cong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-13 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-12 11:16 [PATCH v2] net/sched: fix use-after-free in taprio_dev_notifier Hyunwoo Kim
2025-06-12 11:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-06-12 20:23 ` Cong Wang
2025-06-13 3:36 ` Hyunwoo Kim [this message]
2025-06-13 20:52 ` Vladimir Oltean
2025-06-14 0:46 ` Hyunwoo Kim
2025-06-13 20:33 ` Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aEucrIuj7yxTX58y@v4bel-B760M-AORUS-ELITE-AX \
--to=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=v4bel@theori.io \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox