From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: William Liu <will@willsroot.io>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, victor@mojatatu.com,
pctammela@mojatatu.com, pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org,
stephen@networkplumber.org, dcaratti@redhat.com,
savy@syst3mfailure.io, jiri@resnulli.us, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 1/2] net/sched: Restrict conditions for adding duplicating netems to qdisc tree
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 17:15:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aF80DNslZSX7XT3l@pop-os.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250627061600.56522-1-will@willsroot.io>
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 06:17:31AM +0000, William Liu wrote:
> netem_enqueue's duplication prevention logic breaks when a netem
> resides in a qdisc tree with other netems - this can lead to a
> soft lockup and OOM loop in netem_dequeue, as seen in [1].
> Ensure that a duplicating netem cannot exist in a tree with other
> netems.
>
Thanks for providing more details.
> Previous approaches suggested in discussions in chronological order:
>
> 1) Track duplication status or ttl in the sk_buff struct. Considered
> too specific a use case to extend such a struct, though this would
> be a resilient fix and address other previous and potential future
> DOS bugs like the one described in loopy fun [2].
>
> 2) Restrict netem_enqueue recursion depth like in act_mirred with a
> per cpu variable. However, netem_dequeue can call enqueue on its
> child, and the depth restriction could be bypassed if the child is a
> netem.
>
> 3) Use the same approach as in 2, but add metadata in netem_skb_cb
> to handle the netem_dequeue case and track a packet's involvement
> in duplication. This is an overly complex approach, and Jamal
> notes that the skb cb can be overwritten to circumvent this
> safeguard.
This approach looks most elegant to me since it is per-skb and only
contained for netem. Since netem_skb_cb is shared among qdisc's, what
about just extending qdisc_skb_cb? Something like:
diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
index 638948be4c50..4c5505661986 100644
--- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
+++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h
@@ -436,6 +436,7 @@ struct qdisc_skb_cb {
unsigned int pkt_len;
u16 slave_dev_queue_mapping;
u16 tc_classid;
+ u32 reserved;
};
#define QDISC_CB_PRIV_LEN 20
unsigned char data[QDISC_CB_PRIV_LEN];
Then we just set and check it for duplicated skbs:
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_netem.c b/net/sched/sch_netem.c
index fdd79d3ccd8c..4290f8fca0e9 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_netem.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_netem.c
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static int netem_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch,
* If we need to duplicate packet, then clone it before
* original is modified.
*/
- if (count > 1)
+ if (count > 1 && !qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->reserved)
skb2 = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
/*
@@ -540,9 +540,8 @@ static int netem_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch,
struct Qdisc *rootq = qdisc_root_bh(sch);
u32 dupsave = q->duplicate; /* prevent duplicating a dup... */
- q->duplicate = 0;
+ qdisc_skb_cb(skb2)->reserved = dupsave;
rootq->enqueue(skb2, rootq, to_free);
- q->duplicate = dupsave;
skb2 = NULL;
}
Could this work? It looks even shorter than your patch. :-)
Note, I don't even compile test it, I just show it to you for discussion.
Regards,
Cong Wang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-28 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-27 6:17 [PATCH net v4 1/2] net/sched: Restrict conditions for adding duplicating netems to qdisc tree William Liu
2025-06-28 0:15 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2025-06-28 4:23 ` William Liu
2025-06-28 21:25 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2025-06-29 20:16 ` Cong Wang
2025-06-30 11:32 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2025-06-30 22:39 ` Cong Wang
2025-07-01 13:36 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-01 14:15 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2025-07-01 17:31 ` Cong Wang
2025-07-01 17:37 ` William Liu
2025-07-01 19:08 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2025-06-28 15:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-06-28 21:15 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2025-07-01 18:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-07-01 18:46 ` William Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aF80DNslZSX7XT3l@pop-os.localdomain \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pctammela@mojatatu.com \
--cc=savy@syst3mfailure.io \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=victor@mojatatu.com \
--cc=will@willsroot.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).