netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: aeh@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
	kernel-team@meta.com, Erik Lundgren <elundgren@meta.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Speed up lockdep_unregister_key() with expedited RCU synchronization
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 03:00:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aG49yaIcCPML9GsC@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250321-lockdep-v1-1-78b732d195fb@debian.org>

Hello Waiman, Boqun,

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 02:30:49AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> lockdep_unregister_key() is called from critical code paths, including
> sections where rtnl_lock() is held. For example, when replacing a qdisc
> in a network device, network egress traffic is disabled while
> __qdisc_destroy() is called for every network queue.
> 
> If lockdep is enabled, __qdisc_destroy() calls lockdep_unregister_key(),
> which gets blocked waiting for synchronize_rcu() to complete.
> 
> For example, a simple tc command to replace a qdisc could take 13
> seconds:
> 
>   # time /usr/sbin/tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root handle 0x1: mq
>     real    0m13.195s
>     user    0m0.001s
>     sys     0m2.746s
> 
> During this time, network egress is completely frozen while waiting for
> RCU synchronization.
> 
> Use synchronize_rcu_expedited() instead to minimize the impact on
> critical operations like network connectivity changes.
> 
> This improves 10x the function call to tc, when replacing the qdisc for
> a network card.
> 
>    # time /usr/sbin/tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root handle 0x1: mq
>      real     0m1.789s
>      user     0m0.000s
>      sys      0m1.613s

Can I have this landed as a workaround for the problem above, while
hazard pointers doesn't get merged?

This is affecting some systems that runs the Linus' upstream kernel with
some debug flags enabled, and I would like to have they unblocked.

Once hazard pointer lands, this will be reverted. Is this a fair
approach?

Thanks for your help,
--breno

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-09 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-21  9:30 [PATCH] lockdep: Speed up lockdep_unregister_key() with expedited RCU synchronization Breno Leitao
2025-03-21 10:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-03-21 14:22   ` Breno Leitao
2025-03-24 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-24 12:23   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-03-24 12:24     ` Eric Dumazet
2025-03-24 19:21     ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-24 19:30       ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-25  0:47         ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-25  1:56           ` Waiman Long
2025-03-25  3:41             ` Boqun Feng
     [not found]               ` <934d794b-7ebc-422c-b4fe-3e658a2e5e7a@redhat.com>
2025-03-25 14:57                 ` Waiman Long
2025-03-25 18:45                 ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-25 19:23                   ` Waiman Long
2025-03-25 19:42                     ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-25 23:20                       ` Waiman Long
2025-03-26  5:25                         ` Boqun Feng
     [not found]                           ` <df237702-55c3-466b-b51e-f3fe46ae03ba@redhat.com>
2025-03-26 16:40                             ` Waiman Long
2025-03-26 16:47                               ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-26 17:02                                 ` Waiman Long
2025-03-26 17:10                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-03-26 18:42                                     ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-26 21:37                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-03-31 16:48                                       ` Breno Leitao
2025-03-31 17:34                                         ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-31 17:26                             ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-31 17:33                               ` Waiman Long
2025-03-31 18:33                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-03-31 18:57                                   ` Waiman Long
2025-03-31 21:21                                     ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-31 21:47                                       ` Waiman Long
2025-03-31 17:42                               ` Eric Dumazet
2025-07-09 10:00 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2025-07-09 13:57   ` Waiman Long
2025-07-09 14:57     ` Boqun Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aG49yaIcCPML9GsC@gmail.com \
    --to=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=aeh@meta.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=elundgren@meta.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).