From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE6AF51C5A; Sun, 13 Jul 2025 20:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752437896; cv=none; b=pYcYOgezu0YF/CRUwP1tHad4mqJrtED926KE1OU06WWI2XguZeu18qxHIXdh9HvM/pU0j2Fps/HL9iZ+k0CUxnKffRa1YXEQP9ZacYk2psQ6rl3XvU5KklTlZ5ftih4BQJ+JeXHWqsD6280x/pStEDp1xilHEW4gSzl8ZqoVl1o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752437896; c=relaxed/simple; bh=z7p4KwkBk4NY89HWdCsRxmsgX8iUNRQ1eqdg5NIgzk8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Vwv4amWT9sqbTZ6q73mUmc1FpqXeTxHwAG/8Po+sWSI356dgNuVx9opX1c7VJ+9M1wBokRjOLbWEJHu+Ian0Ai0SaZEq1nfreunRNpHVeYYQnYsJJ8mDYs+BcNUdP6Vwio8EgFnDmbzBdMKmS1xLAO0G2Zepxtu84hgFr1hZAdM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=kW0No6dM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kW0No6dM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4223CC4CEE3; Sun, 13 Jul 2025 20:18:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1752437896; bh=z7p4KwkBk4NY89HWdCsRxmsgX8iUNRQ1eqdg5NIgzk8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kW0No6dMzF8fTDn+PoEaSz/eEoJWAW1AhAszDD4U1QtpkKEp+P7d5p/XH5nWxsTtc mHnW4oHCuPwQ0iAA9JXP+rPAzgLnPY9ctueiezhir5lqNCxJyZ9GmBTf8l+QYzsjbc AwC3ITLEg/gF2aje74Fe5IWQhX/7eaCe6hdYJprlU/HT8T9Mb0BuI/4CaidaRvBgp7 93Ntibd/e1AbuLB+FcizJHOBFEXE5qQWTpcnO1zfmO8oC73UXj+fA7rmhcPMJ5JG0M hWrfREJvRopNEOVItshen3xODE9HCE9MEhOL7AZVcG2SARcRZ3t2RZx9gZbzXxVN9P cxKlErVMYwjbw== Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2025 21:18:11 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Lei Yang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Keir Fraser , Steven Moreland , Frederick Mayle , Stefan Hajnoczi , Stefano Garzarella , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Eugenio =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] vsock/virtio: SKB allocation improvements Message-ID: References: <20250701164507.14883-1-will@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 05:50:16PM +0800, Lei Yang wrote: > I tested this series of patches with virtio-net regression tests, > everything works fine. > > Tested-by: Lei Yang Thanks, but this series doesn't touch virtio-net: it's purely about the virtio transport for vsock. Do the virtio-net regression tests exercise that? Cheers, Will