From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: rtnetlink: try double sleep to give WQ a chance
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 07:19:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHSvbVcc0DKMGcYT@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250711071729.14d727f6@kernel.org>
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 07:17:29AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 02:14:03 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > > sleep 5
> > > + # Schedule out for a bit, address GC runs from the power efficient WQ
> > > + # if the long sleep above has put the whole system into sleep state
> > > + # the WQ may have not had a chance to run.
> > > + sleep 0.1
> > > +
> >
> > How about use slowwait to check if the address still exists.
>
> Weirdly if we read the addresses twice they disappear, I haven't looked
> into the code for the why, but seemed like using slowwait could
> potentially mask the addresses sticking around when nobody runs
> the Netlink handlers for a while? Dunno..
Not sure if I understand correctly. Do you mean the addresses will keep there
if we use slowwait?
Thanks
Hangbin
>
> I queued this debug patch a couple of months ago:
>
> sleep 5
> - run_cmd_grep_fail "10.23.11." ip addr show dev "$devdummy"
> + ip addr show dev "$devdummy" > /tmp/a
> + run_cmd_grep_fail "10.23.11." cat /tmp/a
> if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
> - check_err 1
> - end_test "FAIL: preferred_lft addresses remaining"
> + check_err 1
> + cat /tmp/a
> + echo "==="
> + ip addr show dev "$devdummy"
> + end_test "FAIL: preferred_lft addresses remaining ($lft)"
> return
> fi
>
> And when it flakes the output looks like this:
>
> # 7.23 [+7.00] 297: test-dummy0: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
> # 7.23 [+0.00] link/ether 9e:a6:c4:c2:1b:16 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> # 7.23 [+0.00] inet 10.23.11.81/32 scope global deprecated dynamic test-dummy0
> # 7.23 [+0.00] valid_lft 0sec preferred_lft 0sec
> # 7.23 [+0.00] inet 10.23.11.84/32 scope global deprecated dynamic test-dummy0
> # 7.24 [+0.00] valid_lft 0sec preferred_lft 0sec
> # 7.24 [+0.00] inet 10.23.11.93/32 scope global deprecated dynamic test-dummy0
> # 7.24 [+0.00] valid_lft 0sec preferred_lft 0sec
> # 7.24 [+0.00] inet 10.23.11.94/32 scope global deprecated dynamic test-dummy0
> # 7.24 [+0.00] valid_lft 0sec preferred_lft 0sec
> # 7.24 [+0.00] inet 10.23.11.97/32 scope global deprecated dynamic test-dummy0
> # 7.24 [+0.00] valid_lft 0sec preferred_lft 0sec
> # 7.24 [+0.00] inet 10.23.11.99/32 scope global deprecated dynamic test-dummy0
> # 7.24 [+0.00] valid_lft 0sec preferred_lft 0sec
> # 7.24 [+0.00] inet6 fe80::9ca6:c4ff:fec2:1b16/64 scope link proto kernel_ll
> # 7.24 [+0.00] valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> # 7.24 [+0.00] ===
> # 7.25 [+0.00] 297: test-dummy0: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
> # 7.25 [+0.00] link/ether 9e:a6:c4:c2:1b:16 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> # 7.25 [+0.00] inet6 fe80::9ca6:c4ff:fec2:1b16/64 scope link proto kernel_ll
> # 7.25 [+0.00] valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> # 7.25 [+0.00] FAIL: preferred_lft addresses remaining (1)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-14 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-10 14:53 [PATCH net] selftests: rtnetlink: try double sleep to give WQ a chance Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-11 2:14 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-07-11 14:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-14 7:19 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2025-07-14 22:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHSvbVcc0DKMGcYT@fedora \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).