From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
To: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Cc: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lama Kayal <lkayal@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] net/mlx5: HWS, Enable IPSec hardware offload in legacy mode
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:46:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHX5Lu6Ef4/gLwDS@mev-dev.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d03d6fd7-b86e-4c1f-92ef-ffc26339bf97@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 11:04:54PM +0800, Jianbo Liu wrote:
>
>
> On 7/14/2025 2:43 PM, Michal Swiatkowski wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 08:39:40AM +0300, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> > > From: Lama Kayal <lkayal@nvidia.com>
> > >
> > > IPSec hardware offload in legacy mode should not be affected by the
> > > steering mode, hence it should also work properly with hmfs mode.
> >
> > What about dmfs mode? I am not sure, if you didn't remove it because it
> > is still needed or just forgot about removing it.
> >
>
> It is still needed.
> We support packet offload for all steering modes in legacy, and only dmfs in
> switchdev. This is the logic we added before:
>
> dmfs smfs
> legacy Y Y
> switchdev Y N
>
> Now we support hmfs. It is the same as smfs. So the table becomes:
> dmfs smfs hmfs
> legacy Y Y Y
> switchdev Y N N
>
> Instead of adding "mdev->priv.steering->mode ==
> MLX5_FLOW_STEERING_MODE_HMFS", We removed "mdev->priv.steering->mode ==
> MLX5_FLOW_STEERING_MODE_SMFS", and the code is simpler and clean.
>
Ok, got it, thanks.
>
> > In case it is ok as it is:
> > Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
> >
>
> Yes, it's ok. Thanks for the review.
>
> Jianbo
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > >
> > > Remove steering mode validation when calculating the cap for packet
> > > offload, this will also enable the missing cap MLX5_IPSEC_CAP_PRIO
> > > needed for crypto offload.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lama Kayal <lkayal@nvidia.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_offload.c | 3 +--
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_offload.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_offload.c
> > > index 820debf3fbbf..ef7322d381af 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_offload.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_offload.c
> > > @@ -42,8 +42,7 @@ u32 mlx5_ipsec_device_caps(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
> > > if (MLX5_CAP_IPSEC(mdev, ipsec_full_offload) &&
> > > (mdev->priv.steering->mode == MLX5_FLOW_STEERING_MODE_DMFS ||
> > > - (mdev->priv.steering->mode == MLX5_FLOW_STEERING_MODE_SMFS &&
> > > - is_mdev_legacy_mode(mdev)))) {
> > > + is_mdev_legacy_mode(mdev))) {
> > > if (MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_NIC_TX(mdev,
> > > reformat_add_esp_trasport) &&
> > > MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_NIC_RX(mdev,
> > > --
> > > 2.40.1
> > >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-14 5:39 [PATCH net-next 0/6] net/mlx5: misc changes 2025-07-14 Tariq Toukan
2025-07-14 5:39 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] net/mlx5: HWS, Enable IPSec hardware offload in legacy mode Tariq Toukan
2025-07-14 6:43 ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-07-14 15:04 ` Jianbo Liu
2025-07-15 6:46 ` Michal Swiatkowski [this message]
2025-07-14 5:39 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] net/mlx5e: fix kdoc warning on eswitch.h Tariq Toukan
2025-07-14 6:46 ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-07-14 5:39 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] net/mlx5e: Properly access RCU protected qdisc_sleeping variable Tariq Toukan
2025-07-14 6:49 ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-07-14 5:39 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] net/mlx5e: SHAMPO, Cleanup reservation size formula Tariq Toukan
2025-07-15 7:11 ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-07-14 5:39 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] net/mlx5e: SHAMPO, Remove mlx5e_shampo_get_log_hd_entry_size() Tariq Toukan
2025-07-15 7:19 ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-07-14 5:39 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] net/mlx5e: Remove duplicate mkey from SHAMPO header Tariq Toukan
2025-07-15 7:38 ` Michal Swiatkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHX5Lu6Ef4/gLwDS@mev-dev.igk.intel.com \
--to=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=jianbol@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkayal@nvidia.com \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).