Re: [PATCH 50/80] nfc: trf7970a: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls

[Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>]

Hi Krzysztof,

On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 10:03:27AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/07/2025 09:54, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(),
> > pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call
> > to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to
> > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > The cover letter of the set can be found here
> > <URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>.
> > 
> > In brief, this patch depends on PM runtime patches adding marking the last
> > busy timestamp in autosuspend related functions. The patches are here, on
> > rc2:
> > 
> 
> You did not send cover letter to people, so this changelog should
> explain what I should do with this patch (what is the merging/dependency).

I didn't as it would have had too many recipients (more than 200 in fact).
As you may have noticed, the URL for the cover letter is a few lines above,
also its Message-ID can be found in the In-reply-to: header.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus