public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Xiumei Mu <xmu@redhat.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Long Xin <lxin@redhat.com>,
	Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@oracle.com>,
	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: rtnetlink.sh: remove esp4_offload after test
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 06:25:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIHRwwOl-FS8KOV0@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <238b803af900dfc5f87f6ddc03805cc42da2ca35.1753332902.git.xmu@redhat.com>

Hi Xiumei,
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 12:55:02PM +0800, Xiumei Mu wrote:
> The esp4_offload module, loaded during IPsec offload tests, should
> be reset to its default settings after testing.
> Otherwise, leaving it enabled could unintentionally affect subsequence
> test cases by keeping offload active.

Would you please show which subsequence test will be affected?

> 
> Fixes: 2766a11161cc ("selftests: rtnetlink: add ipsec offload API test")

It would be good to Cc the fix commit author. You can use
`./scripts/get_maintainer.pl your_patch_file` to get the contacts you
need to Cc.

> Signed-off-by: Xiumei Mu <xmu@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
> index 2e8243a65b50..5cc1b5340a1a 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
> @@ -673,6 +673,11 @@ kci_test_ipsec_offload()
>  	sysfsf=$sysfsd/ipsec
>  	sysfsnet=/sys/bus/netdevsim/devices/netdevsim0/net/
>  	probed=false
> +	esp4_offload_probed_default=false
> +
> +	if lsmod | grep -q esp4_offload; then
> +		esp4_offload_probed_default=true
> +	fi

If the mode is loaded by default, how to avoid the subsequence test to be
failed?

>  
>  	if ! mount | grep -q debugfs; then
>  		mount -t debugfs none /sys/kernel/debug/ &> /dev/null
> @@ -766,6 +771,7 @@ EOF
>  	fi
>  
>  	# clean up any leftovers
> +	[ $esp4_offload_probed_default == false ] && rmmod esp4_offload

The new patch need to pass shellcheck. We need to double quote the variable.

Thanks
Hangbin
>  	echo 0 > /sys/bus/netdevsim/del_device
>  	$probed && rmmod netdevsim
>  
> -- 
> 2.50.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-24  6:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-24  4:55 [PATCH net] selftests: rtnetlink.sh: remove esp4_offload after test Xiumei Mu
2025-07-24  6:25 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2025-07-24  8:20   ` Xiumei Mu
     [not found]     ` <b1943474-c24b-4def-a46b-74a99e92b1d4@onemain.com>
2025-07-24 17:58       ` Shannon Nelson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aIHRwwOl-FS8KOV0@fedora \
    --to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lxin@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=shannon.nelson@oracle.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=xmu@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox