From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Maher Azzouzi <maherazz04@gmail.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sched: taprio: align entry index attr validation with mqprio
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 15:35:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIQGnbRbTRihh6ii@pop-os.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250725-taprio-idx-parse-v1-1-b582fffcde37@kernel.org>
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 10:56:47AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> Both taprio and mqprio have code to validate respective entry index
> attributes. The validation is indented to ensure that the attribute is
> present, and that it's value is in range, and that each value is only
> used once.
>
> The purpose of this patch is to align the implementation of taprio with
> that of mqprio as there seems to be no good reason for them to differ.
> For one thing, this way, bugs will be present in both or neither.
>
> As a follow-up some consideration could be given to a common function
> used by both sch.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Except of tdc run: the results of the taprio tests
>
> # ok 81 ba39 - Add taprio Qdisc to multi-queue device (8 queues)
> # ok 82 9462 - Add taprio Qdisc with multiple sched-entry
> # ok 83 8d92 - Add taprio Qdisc with txtime-delay
> # ok 84 d092 - Delete taprio Qdisc with valid handle
> # ok 85 8471 - Show taprio class
> # ok 86 0a85 - Add taprio Qdisc to single-queue device
> # ok 87 6f62 - Add taprio Qdisc with too short interval
> # ok 88 831f - Add taprio Qdisc with too short cycle-time
> # ok 89 3e1e - Add taprio Qdisc with an invalid cycle-time
> # ok 90 39b4 - Reject grafting taprio as child qdisc of software taprio
> # ok 91 e8a1 - Reject grafting taprio as child qdisc of offloaded taprio
> # ok 92 a7bf - Graft cbs as child of software taprio
> # ok 93 6a83 - Graft cbs as child of offloaded taprio
>
> Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> Cc: Maher Azzouzi <maherazz04@gmail.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250723125521.GA2459@horms.kernel.org/
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-25 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-25 9:56 [PATCH net-next] net/sched: taprio: align entry index attr validation with mqprio Simon Horman
2025-07-25 22:35 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2025-07-26 0:10 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2025-07-26 18:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aIQGnbRbTRihh6ii@pop-os.localdomain \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=maherazz04@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox