From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jakub Acs <acsjakub@amazon.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@riseup.net>,
Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] hsr: use netdev_master_upper_dev_link() when linking lower ports
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 04:04:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aK_VQurV1-eQ0UJ9@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250827180603.001b85b3@kernel.org>
On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 06:06:03PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 01:33:52 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > Unlike VLAN devices, HSR changes the lower device’s rx_handler, which
> > prevents the lower device from being attached to another master.
> > Switch to using netdev_master_upper_dev_link() when setting up the lower
> > device.
> >
> > This also improves user experience, since ip link will now display the
> ^^^^
>
> Why this "also" here? You haven't mentioned any benefit of this change
> up to this point. AFAIK having the master link is the only one?
Apart from the "fix"(I thought), we can "also" benefit of the ip link output.
>
> > HSR device as the master for its ports.
> >
> > Fixes: e0a4b99773d3 ("hsr: use upper/lower device infrastructure")
>
> The current behavior is 5 years old, AFAICT. We need a reason to treat
> this as a fix, right now this looks like net-next material..
If you think this is not a fix. Sure I can remove the "also" word and post to
net-next :)
Thanks
Hangbin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-28 4:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-26 1:33 [PATCH net] hsr: use netdev_master_upper_dev_link() when linking lower ports Hangbin Liu
2025-08-28 1:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-28 4:04 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aK_VQurV1-eQ0UJ9@fedora \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=acsjakub@amazon.de \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ffmancera@riseup.net \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox