From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@intel.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
bridge@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 5/5] selftests/net: add offload checking test for virtual interface
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 11:36:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aL6jlYPhsPfDKT8C@krikkit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aL5YamjbZB5gsL30@fedora>
2025-09-08, 04:15:38 +0000, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2025 at 11:30:58PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > > +check_xfrm()
> > > +{
> > > + local dev=$1
> > > + local src=192.0.2.1
> > > + local dst=192.0.2.2
> > > + local key="0x3132333435363738393031323334353664636261"
> > > +
> > > + RET=0
> > > +
> > > + ip -n "$ns" xfrm state flush
> > > + ip -n "$ns" xfrm state add proto esp src "$src" dst "$dst" spi 9 \
> > > + mode transport reqid 42 aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" "$key" 128 \
> > > + sel src "$src"/24 dst "$dst"/24 offload dev "$dev" dir out
> >
> > It's maybe not something you would expect, but this codepath will not
> > check that NETIF_F_HW_ESP is set on $dev (you can verify that by
> > running "ip xfrm state add ... offload ..." on the same bond+netdevsim
> > combination before/after toggling esp-hw-offload on/off for the
> > bond). Why not use __check_offload again for this feature?
>
> The esp-hw-offload is fixed on netdevsim
>
> # ethtool -k eni0np1 | grep -i esp-hw-offload
> esp-hw-offload: on [fixed]
>
> There is no way to disable it.
I don't think this is intentional. nsim_ipsec_init only adds
NSIM_ESP_FEATURES to ->features but not to ->hw_features, but I think
it was just forgotten. I added a few in 494bd83bb519 ("netdevsim: add
more hw_features"), extending nsim_ipsec_init (and nsim_macsec_init
since I made the same mistake) to also add features to ->hw_features
would make sense to me.
> After we add the netdevsim to bond,
> the bond also shows "esp-hw-offload off" as the flag is inherit
> in dev->hw_enc_features, not dev->features.
Did you mean dev->hw_features?
> It looks the only way to check if bond dev->hw_enc_features has NETIF_F_HW_ESP
> is try set xfrm offload. As
Was this test meant to check hw_enc_features?
To check hw_enc_features, I think the only way would be sending GSO
packets, since it's only used in those situations.
> static int xfrm_api_check(struct net_device *dev)
> {
But this doesn't get called when creating a new xfrm state. Trying to
create a new offloaded xfrm state doesn't look at any of the
netdev->*features (and we can't change that behavior anymore).
xfrm_api_check only gets called for NETDEV_REGISTER/NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE
to validate whether the netdevice is set up correctly.
> #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD
> if ((dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP_TX_CSUM) &&
> !(dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP))
> return NOTIFY_BAD;
>
> if ((dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP) &&
> (!(dev->xfrmdev_ops &&
> dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add &&
> dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete)))
> return NOTIFY_BAD;
>
> Please correct me if I made any mistake.
>
> Thanks
> Hangbin
--
Sabrina
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-08 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-02 7:25 [PATCHv2 net-next 0/5] net: common feature compute for upper interface Hangbin Liu
2025-09-02 7:25 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 1/5] net: add a common function to compute features from lowers devices Hangbin Liu
2025-09-06 17:42 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-08 3:20 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-09-07 0:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-02 7:25 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 2/5] bonding: use common function to compute the features Hangbin Liu
2025-09-02 7:26 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 3/5] team: " Hangbin Liu
2025-09-02 7:26 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 4/5] net: bridge: " Hangbin Liu
2025-09-02 7:26 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 5/5] selftests/net: add offload checking test for virtual interface Hangbin Liu
2025-09-06 21:30 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-08 4:15 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-09-08 9:36 ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2025-09-08 10:14 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-09-08 21:48 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-09 2:54 ` Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aL6jlYPhsPfDKT8C@krikkit \
--to=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=ahmed.zaki@intel.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).