netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Hubert Wiśniewski" <hubert.wisniewski.25632@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>, "Xu Yang" <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 1/1] net: usb: asix: ax88772: drop phylink use in PM to avoid MDIO runtime PM wakeups
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 21:46:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMM1K_bkk4clt5WD@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250911075513.1d90f8b0@kernel.org>

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 07:55:13AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 15:39:20 +0100 Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > I'm not surprised. I'm guessing phylib is using polled mode, and
> > removing the suspend/resume handling likely means that it's at the
> > mercy of the timings of the phylib state machine running (which is
> > what is complaining here) vs the MDIO bus being available for use.
> > 
> > Given that this happens, I'm convinced that the original patch is
> > the wrong approach. The driver needs the phylink suspend/resume
> > calls to shutdown and restart phylib polling, and the resume call
> > needs to be placed in such a location that the MDIO bus is already
> > accessible.
> 
> We keep having issues with rtnl_lock taken from resume.
> Honestly, I'm not sure anyone has found a good solution, yet.
> Mostly people just don't implement runtime PM.
> 
> If we were able to pass optional context to suspend/resume
> we could implement conditional locking. We'd lose a lot of
> self-respect but it'd make fixing such bugs easier..

Normal drivers have the option of separate callbacks for runtime PM
vs system suspend/resume states. It seems USB doesn't, just munging
everything into one pair of suspend and resume ops without any way
of telling them apart. I suggest that is part of the problem here.

However, I'm not a USB expert, so...

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-11 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20250911135853eucas1p283b1afd37287b715403cd2cdbfa03a94@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH net v1 1/1] net: usb: asix: ax88772: drop phylink use in PM to avoid MDIO runtime PM wakeups Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-08 17:00   ` Hubert Wiśniewski
2025-09-09  7:17     ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-09 23:56       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-10  4:16         ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-09  2:05   ` Xu Yang
2025-09-09 23:58   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-10  4:11     ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-11  0:50       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-11  1:00   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-09-11 13:58   ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-09-11 14:39     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-11 14:55       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-11 20:46         ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2025-09-12  2:30           ` Alan Stern
2025-09-12  8:33             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-12 14:29               ` Alan Stern
2025-09-12 14:37                 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-13  6:45                   ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-16  7:18                     ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-16 14:42                       ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aMM1K_bkk4clt5WD@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hubert.wisniewski.25632@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xu.yang_2@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).