Re: [BUG?] bpf_skb_net_shrink does not unset encapsulation flag

[Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>]

On 09/10, Tobias Böhm wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> when decapsulating VXLAN packets with bpf_skb_adjust_room and redirecting to
> a tap device I observed unexpected segmentation.
> 
> In my setup there is a sched_cls program attached at the ingress path of a
> physical NIC with GRO enabled. Packets are redirected either directly for
> plain traffic, or decapsulated beforehand in case of VXLAN. Decapsulation is
> done by bpf_skb_adjust_room with BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L3_IPV4.
> 
> For both kinds of traffic GRO on the physical NIC works as expected
> resulting in merged packets.
> 
> Large non-decapsulated packets are transmitted directly on the tap interface
> as expected. But surprisingly, decapsulated packets are being segmented
> again before transmission.
> 
> When analyzing and comparing the call chains I observed that
> netif_skb_features returns different values for the different kind of
> traffic.
> 
> The tap devices have the following features set:
> 
>     dev->features        =   0x1558c9
>     dev->hw_enc_features = 0x10000001
> 
> For the non-decapsulated traffic netif_skb_features returns 0x1558c9 but for
> the decapsulated traffic it returns 0x1. This is same value as the result of
> "dev->features & dev->hw_enc_features".
> 
> In netif_skb_features this operation effectively happens in case
> skb->encapsulation is set. Inspecting the skb in both cases showed that in
> case of decapsulation the skb->encapsulation flag was indeed still set.
> 
> I wonder if there is a reason that the skb->encapsulation flag is not unset
> in bpf_skb_net_shrink when BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_* flags are present? Since
> skb->encapsulation is set in bpf_skb_net_grow when adding space for
> encapsulation my expectation would be that the flag is also unset when doing
> the opposite operation.

+ Willem and netdev for visibility.