netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Hubert Wiśniewski" <hubert.wisniewski.25632@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>, "Xu Yang" <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 1/1] net: usb: asix: ax88772: drop phylink use in PM to avoid MDIO runtime PM wakeups
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 09:18:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMkPMa650kfKfmF4@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aMUS8ZIUpZJ4HNNX@pengutronix.de>

On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 08:45:05AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 03:37:52PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 10:29:47AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 09:33:05AM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 10:30:09PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > > > The USB subsystem uses only one pair of callbacks for suspend and resume 
> > > > > because USB hardware has only one suspend state.  However, the callbacks 
> > > > > do get an extra pm_message_t parameter which they can use to distinguish 
> > > > > between system sleep transitions and runtime PM transitions.
> > > > 
> > > > Unfortunately, this isn't the case. While a struct usb_device_driver's
> > > > suspend()/resume() methods get the pm_message_t, a struct usb_driver's
> > > > suspend()/resume() methods do not:
> > > > 
> > > > static int usb_resume_interface(struct usb_device *udev,
> > > >                 struct usb_interface *intf, pm_message_t msg, int reset_resume)
> > > > {
> > > >         struct usb_driver       *driver;
> > > > ...
> > > >         if (reset_resume) {
> > > >                 if (driver->reset_resume) {
> > > >                         status = driver->reset_resume(intf);
> > > > ...
> > > >         } else {
> > > >                 status = driver->resume(intf);
> > > > 
> > > > vs
> > > > 
> > > > static int usb_resume_device(struct usb_device *udev, pm_message_t msg)
> > > > {
> > > >         struct usb_device_driver        *udriver;
> > > > ...
> > > >         if (status == 0 && udriver->resume)
> > > >                 status = udriver->resume(udev, msg);
> > > > 
> > > > and in drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c:
> > > > 
> > > > static struct usb_driver asix_driver = {
> > > > ...
> > > >         .suspend =      asix_suspend,
> > > >         .resume =       asix_resume,
> > > >         .reset_resume = asix_resume,
> > > > 
> > > > where asix_resume() only takes one argument:
> > > > 
> > > > static int asix_resume(struct usb_interface *intf)
> > > > {
> > > 
> > > Your email made me go back and check the code more carefully, and it 
> > > turns out that we were both half-right.  :-)
> > > 
> > > The pm_message_t argument is passed to the usb_driver's ->suspend 
> > > callback in usb_suspend_interface(), but not to the ->resume callback in 
> > > usb_resume_interface().  Yes, it's inconsistent.
> > > 
> > > I suppose the API could be changed, at the cost of updating a lot of 
> > > drivers.  But it would be easier if this wasn't necessary, if there was 
> > > some way to work around the problem.  Unfortunately, I don't know 
> > > anything about how the network stack handles suspend and resume, or 
> > > what sort of locking it requires, so I can't offer any suggestions.
> > 
> > I, too, am unable to help further as I have no bandwidth available
> > to deal with this. Sorry.
> 
> Thanks for all the valuable input.
> 
> I’ll process the feedback and investigate possible ways to proceed. As a
> first step I’ll measure the actual power savings from USB auto-suspend
> on AX88772 to see if runtime PM is worth the added complexity.

I ran quick power measurements to check whether USB autosuspend is worth the
added complexity.

Meaning:
- "admin up/down" = ip link set dev <if> up/down.
- No link partner was attached, so the physical link was down in all tests.

Setups:
- Debian 5.10 (USB autosuspend present, no phylib).
- Debian 6.1 (phylib present, no regression).
- Power meter: Fnirsi FNB58.
- Env: QEMU 9.2.1 (USB passthrough)
       xHCI host Intel 100/C230
       device ASIX AX88772B (0b95:772b)

Legend:
- "RT: active" = runtime PM on;
- "RT: suspended" = runtime PM auto (device suspended).

Results:
- Kernel 5.10.237-1
  admin up (link down): 0.453 W (RT: active)
  admin down: 0.453 W (RT: active)
  admin down: 0.453 W (RT: suspended)

- Kernel 6.1.148-1
  admin up (link down): 0.453 W (RT: active)
  admin down: 0.248 W (RT: active)
  admin down: 0.248 W (RT: suspended)

Observations:
In this setup, USB autosuspend did not reduce power further (admin-down power
is identical with/without autosuspend).

The drop from ~0.453 W -> ~0.248 W on 6.1 appears to come from the phylib
migration (PHY powered down on admin-down), not from autosuspend.

Proposal:
Given autosuspend brings no measurable benefit here, and it hasn’t been
effectively functional for this device in earlier kernels, I suggest a minimal
-stable patch that disables USB autosuspend for ASIX driver to avoid the
PM/RTNL/MDIO issues. If someone needs autosuspend-based low-power later, they
can implement a proper device low-power sequence and re-enable it.

Would this minimal -stable patch be acceptable?

Best Regards,
Oleksij
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-16  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20250911135853eucas1p283b1afd37287b715403cd2cdbfa03a94@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH net v1 1/1] net: usb: asix: ax88772: drop phylink use in PM to avoid MDIO runtime PM wakeups Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-08 17:00   ` Hubert Wiśniewski
2025-09-09  7:17     ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-09 23:56       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-10  4:16         ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-09  2:05   ` Xu Yang
2025-09-09 23:58   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-10  4:11     ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-11  0:50       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-11  1:00   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-09-11 13:58   ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-09-11 14:39     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-11 14:55       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-11 20:46         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-12  2:30           ` Alan Stern
2025-09-12  8:33             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-12 14:29               ` Alan Stern
2025-09-12 14:37                 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-13  6:45                   ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-16  7:18                     ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2025-09-16 14:42                       ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aMkPMa650kfKfmF4@pengutronix.de \
    --to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hubert.wisniewski.25632@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=xu.yang_2@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).