From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: "Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)" <bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com>
Cc: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
"Jonathan Lemon" <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Mykola Lysenko" <mykolal@fb.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
"Alexis Lothore" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Fix memory leaks
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 19:58:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMmlNc1z5ULnOjJY@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250904-xsk-v3-3-ce382e331485@bootlin.com>
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 12:10:18PM +0200, Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation) wrote:
> Some tests introduce memory leaks by not freeing all the pkt_stream
> objects they're creating.
>
> Fix these memory leaks.
I would appreciate being more explicit here as I've been scratching my
head here.
From what I see the problem is with testapp_stats_rx_dropped() as it's the
one case that uses replace and receive half of pkt streams, both of which
overwrite the default pkt stream. So we lose a pointer to one of pkt
streams and leak it eventually.
Rest of cases should be ok with pkt_stream_restore_default() being called
after each ->test_func() in run_pkt_test().
Anyways let me hear more on your reasoning, thanks! I'm gonna have a
second look tomorrow, I might be missing something.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation) <bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xsk.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xsk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xsk.c
> index 37752b2dad651b36d155051931d7b3b902fac403..e4059c7d0a289449a6b73669fa87f7440b7f55c0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xsk.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xsk.c
> @@ -546,6 +546,13 @@ static void pkt_stream_receive_half(struct test_spec *test)
> struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream = test->ifobj_tx->xsk->pkt_stream;
> u32 i;
>
> + if (test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream != test->rx_pkt_stream_default)
> + /* Packet stream has already been replaced so we have to release this one.
> + * The newly created one will be freed by the restore_default() at the
> + * end of the test
> + */
> + pkt_stream_delete(test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream);
> +
> test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream = pkt_stream_generate(pkt_stream->nb_pkts,
> pkt_stream->pkts[0].len);
> pkt_stream = test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream;
> @@ -573,6 +580,22 @@ static void pkt_stream_even_odd_sequence(struct test_spec *test)
> }
> }
>
> +static void release_even_odd_sequence(struct test_spec *test)
> +{
> + struct pkt_stream *later_free_tx = test->ifobj_tx->xsk->pkt_stream;
> + struct pkt_stream *later_free_rx = test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < test->nb_sockets; i++) {
> + /* later_free_{rx/tx} will be freed by restore_default() */
> + if (test->ifobj_tx->xsk_arr[i].pkt_stream != later_free_tx)
> + pkt_stream_delete(test->ifobj_tx->xsk_arr[i].pkt_stream);
> + if (test->ifobj_rx->xsk_arr[i].pkt_stream != later_free_rx)
> + pkt_stream_delete(test->ifobj_rx->xsk_arr[i].pkt_stream);
> + }
> +
> +}
> +
> static u64 pkt_get_addr(struct pkt *pkt, struct xsk_umem_info *umem)
> {
> if (!pkt->valid)
> @@ -1874,6 +1897,7 @@ int testapp_stats_tx_invalid_descs(struct test_spec *test)
> int testapp_stats_rx_full(struct test_spec *test)
> {
> pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS + DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS / 2, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
> + pkt_stream_delete(test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream);
> test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream = pkt_stream_generate(DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
>
> test->ifobj_rx->xsk->rxqsize = DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS;
> @@ -1885,6 +1909,7 @@ int testapp_stats_rx_full(struct test_spec *test)
> int testapp_stats_fill_empty(struct test_spec *test)
> {
> pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS + DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS / 2, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
> + pkt_stream_delete(test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream);
> test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream = pkt_stream_generate(DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
>
> test->ifobj_rx->use_fill_ring = false;
> @@ -2043,6 +2068,7 @@ int testapp_xdp_shared_umem(struct test_spec *test)
> {
> struct xsk_xdp_progs *skel_rx = test->ifobj_rx->xdp_progs;
> struct xsk_xdp_progs *skel_tx = test->ifobj_tx->xdp_progs;
> + int ret;
>
> test->total_steps = 1;
> test->nb_sockets = 2;
> @@ -2053,7 +2079,11 @@ int testapp_xdp_shared_umem(struct test_spec *test)
>
> pkt_stream_even_odd_sequence(test);
>
> - return testapp_validate_traffic(test);
> + ret = testapp_validate_traffic(test);
> +
> + release_even_odd_sequence(test);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> int testapp_poll_txq_tmout(struct test_spec *test)
>
> --
> 2.50.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-04 10:10 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/14] selftests/bpf: Integrate test_xsk.c to test_progs framework Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-04 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Split xskxceiver Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-16 14:21 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-09-17 15:28 ` Bastien Curutchet
2025-09-04 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Initialize bitmap before use Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-04 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Fix memory leaks Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-16 17:58 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2025-09-17 15:32 ` Bastien Curutchet
2025-09-17 18:33 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-09-18 8:07 ` Bastien Curutchet
2025-09-04 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Wrap test clean-up in functions Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-04 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Release resources when swap fails Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-04 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Add return value to init_iface() Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-04 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Don't exit immediately when xsk_attach fails Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-04 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Don't exit immediately when gettimeofday fails Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-04 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Don't exit immediately when workers fail Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-04 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Don't exit immediately if validate_traffic fails Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-04 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Don't exit immediately on allocation failures Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-04 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Move exit_with_error to xskxceiver.c Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-04 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Isolate flaky tests Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-04 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/14] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Integrate test_xsk.c to test_progs framework Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
2025-09-16 18:16 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-09-17 15:37 ` Bastien Curutchet
2025-09-04 14:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/14] selftests/bpf: " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-09-04 14:50 ` Bastien Curutchet
2025-09-15 17:13 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMmlNc1z5ULnOjJY@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).