From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bridge@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 nf-next 3/3] netfilter: nft_chain_filter: Add bridge double vlan and pppoe
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 10:25:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aN425i3sBuYiC5D5@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250925183043.114660-4-ericwouds@gmail.com>
Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com> wrote:
> This adds the capability to evaluate 802.1ad, QinQ, PPPoE and PPPoE-in-Q
> packets in the bridge filter chain.
Same comment as previous patch, this needs to explain the why, not the what.
nft_do_chain_bridge() passes all packets to the interpreter, so the
above statement is not correct either, you can already filter on all of
these packet types. This exposes NFT_PKTINFO_L4PROTO etc, which is
different than what this commit message says.
I also vaguely remember I commented that this changes (breaks?) existing
behaviour for a rule like "tcp dport 22 accept" which may now match e.g.
a PPPoE packet.
Pablo, whats your take on this? Do we need a new NFPROTO_BRIDGE
expression that can munge (populate) nft_pktinfo with the l4 data?
That would move this off to user policy (config) land.
(or extend nft_meta_bridge, doesn't absolutely require a brand new expression).
> +static inline int nft_set_bridge_pktinfo(struct nft_pktinfo *pkt,
> + struct sk_buff *skb,
> + const struct nf_hook_state *state,
> + __be16 *proto)
This is only called from one .c file and unless this gets changed later
this should reside in that .c file (without inline keyword).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-02 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 18:30 [PATCH v15 nf-next 0/3] conntrack: bridge: add double vlan, pppoe and pppoe-in-q Eric Woudstra
2025-09-25 18:30 ` [PATCH v15 nf-next 1/3] netfilter: utils: nf_checksum(_partial) correct data!=networkheader Eric Woudstra
2025-09-25 18:30 ` [PATCH v15 nf-next 2/3] netfilter: bridge: Add conntrack double vlan and pppoe Eric Woudstra
2025-09-26 14:10 ` Simon Horman
2025-10-02 8:11 ` Florian Westphal
2025-09-25 18:30 ` [PATCH v15 nf-next 3/3] netfilter: nft_chain_filter: Add bridge " Eric Woudstra
2025-10-02 8:25 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2025-10-28 11:43 ` Eric Woudstra
2025-10-30 23:14 ` Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aN425i3sBuYiC5D5@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ericwouds@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).