From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Cc: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 4/6] net: ice: Add xmo_rx_checksum callback
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 12:32:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNElrLdHoh__L1xj@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aNEh5Q1c93J0p9TN@boxer>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3367 bytes --]
[...]
>
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> any chance we could have some common code used both here and in
> ice_rx_csum() ?
Hi Maciej,
ack, I will look into it.
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> > +{
> > + const struct ice_xdp_buff *xdp_ext = (void *)ctx;
> > + const union ice_32b_rx_flex_desc *rx_desc = xdp_ext->eop_desc;
> > + u16 rx_status0, rx_status1, ptype = ice_get_ptype(rx_desc);
> > + struct libeth_rx_pt decoded = libie_rx_pt_parse(ptype);
> > + bool ipv4, ipv6;
> > +
> > + if (!libeth_rx_pt_has_checksum(xdp_ext->xdp_buff.rxq->dev, decoded))
> > + goto checksum_none;
> > +
> > + rx_status0 = le16_to_cpu(rx_desc->wb.status_error0);
> > + rx_status1 = le16_to_cpu(rx_desc->wb.status_error1);
> > + if ((xdp_ext->pkt_ctx->rxq_flags & ICE_RX_FLAGS_RING_GCS) &&
> > + rx_desc->wb.rxdid == ICE_RXDID_FLEX_NIC &&
> > + (decoded.inner_prot == LIBETH_RX_PT_INNER_TCP ||
> > + decoded.inner_prot == LIBETH_RX_PT_INNER_UDP ||
> > + decoded.inner_prot == LIBETH_RX_PT_INNER_ICMP)) {
> > + const struct ice_32b_rx_flex_desc_nic *desc;
> > + u16 csum;
> > +
> > + desc = (struct ice_32b_rx_flex_desc_nic *)rx_desc;
> > + *ip_summed = CHECKSUM_COMPLETE;
> > + csum = (__force u16)desc->raw_csum;
> > + *cksum_meta = csum_unfold((__force __sum16)swab16(csum));
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* check if HW has decoded the packet and checksum */
> > + if (!(rx_status0 & BIT(ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS0_L3L4P_S)))
> > + goto checksum_none;
> > +
> > + ipv4 = libeth_rx_pt_get_ip_ver(decoded) == LIBETH_RX_PT_OUTER_IPV4;
> > + if (ipv4 && (rx_status0 & (BIT(ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS0_XSUM_EIPE_S))))
> > + goto checksum_none;
> > +
> > + if (ipv4 && (rx_status0 & (BIT(ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS0_XSUM_IPE_S))))
> > + goto checksum_none;
> > +
> > + ipv6 = libeth_rx_pt_get_ip_ver(decoded) == LIBETH_RX_PT_OUTER_IPV6;
> > + if (ipv6 && (rx_status0 & (BIT(ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS0_IPV6EXADD_S))))
> > + goto checksum_none;
> > +
> > + /* check for L4 errors and handle packets that were not able to be
> > + * checksummed due to arrival speed
> > + */
> > + if (rx_status0 & BIT(ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS0_XSUM_L4E_S))
> > + goto checksum_none;
> > +
> > + /* check for outer UDP checksum error in tunneled packets */
> > + if ((rx_status1 & BIT(ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS1_NAT_S)) &&
> > + (rx_status0 & BIT(ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS0_XSUM_EUDPE_S)))
> > + goto checksum_none;
> > +
> > + /* If there is an outer header present that might contain a checksum
> > + * we need to bump the checksum level by 1 to reflect the fact that
> > + * we are indicating we validated the inner checksum.
> > + */
> > + if (decoded.tunnel_type >= LIBETH_RX_PT_TUNNEL_IP_GRENAT)
> > + *cksum_meta = 1;
> > +
> > + *ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +checksum_none:
> > + *ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
> > + *cksum_meta = 0;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * ice_xdp_rx_vlan_tag - VLAN tag XDP hint handler
> > * @ctx: XDP buff pointer
> > @@ -584,4 +665,5 @@ const struct xdp_metadata_ops ice_xdp_md_ops = {
> > .xmo_rx_timestamp = ice_xdp_rx_hw_ts,
> > .xmo_rx_hash = ice_xdp_rx_hash,
> > .xmo_rx_vlan_tag = ice_xdp_rx_vlan_tag,
> > + .xmo_rx_checksum = ice_xdp_rx_checksum,
> > };
> >
> > --
> > 2.51.0
> >
> >
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-22 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-20 12:20 [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/6] Add the the capability to load HW RX checsum in eBPF programs Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-20 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 1/6] netlink: specs: Add XDP RX checksum capability to XDP metadata specs Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-22 15:39 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-09-22 15:55 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-20 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 2/6] net: xdp: Add xmo_rx_checksum callback Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-22 15:43 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-09-22 15:56 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-20 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 3/6] veth: Add xmo_rx_checksum callback to veth driver Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-20 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 4/6] net: ice: Add xmo_rx_checksum callback Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-22 10:16 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-09-22 10:32 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2025-09-20 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add selftest support for bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-20 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum support to xdp_hw_metadat prog Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aNElrLdHoh__L1xj@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox