netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 1/5] netlink: specs: Add XDP RX checksum capability to XDP metadata specs
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 21:20:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNYUqdaIJV1cvFCb@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250925-bpf-xdp-meta-rxcksum-v2-1-6b3fe987ce91@kernel.org>

On 09/25, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> Introduce XDP RX checksum capability to XDP metadata specs. XDP RX
> checksum will be use by devices capable of exposing receive checksum
> result via bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum().
> Moreover, introduce xmo_rx_checksum netdev callback in order allow the
> eBPF program bounded to the device to retrieve the RX checksum result
> computed by the hw NIC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml |  5 +++++
>  include/net/xdp.h                       | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  net/core/xdp.c                          | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml b/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml
> index e00d3fa1c152d7165e9485d6d383a2cc9cef7cfd..00699bf4a7fdb67c6b9ee3548098b0c933fd39a4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml
> @@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ definitions:
>          doc: |
>            Device is capable of exposing receive packet VLAN tag via
>            bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_vlan_tag().
> +      -
> +        name: checksum
> +        doc: |
> +          Device is capable of exposing receive checksum result via
> +          bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum().
>    -
>      type: flags
>      name: xsk-flags
> diff --git a/include/net/xdp.h b/include/net/xdp.h
> index aa742f413c358575396530879af4570dc3fc18de..9ab9ac10ae2074b70618a9d4f32544d8b9a30b63 100644
> --- a/include/net/xdp.h
> +++ b/include/net/xdp.h
> @@ -586,6 +586,10 @@ void xdp_attachment_setup(struct xdp_attachment_info *info,
>  			   NETDEV_XDP_RX_METADATA_VLAN_TAG, \
>  			   bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_vlan_tag, \
>  			   xmo_rx_vlan_tag) \
> +	XDP_METADATA_KFUNC(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_CHECKSUM, \
> +			   NETDEV_XDP_RX_METADATA_CHECKSUM, \
> +			   bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum, \
> +			   xmo_rx_checksum)
>  
>  enum xdp_rx_metadata {
>  #define XDP_METADATA_KFUNC(name, _, __, ___) name,
> @@ -643,12 +647,22 @@ enum xdp_rss_hash_type {
>  	XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_SCTP_EX = XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_SCTP | XDP_RSS_L3_DYNHDR,
>  };
>  
> +enum xdp_checksum {
> +	XDP_CHECKSUM_NONE		= CHECKSUM_NONE,
> +	XDP_CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY	= CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY,
> +	XDP_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE		= CHECKSUM_COMPLETE,
> +	XDP_CHECKSUM_PARTIAL		= CHECKSUM_PARTIAL,
> +};

Btw, might be worth mentioning, awhile ago we had settled on a smaller set of
exposed types:

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230811161509.19722-13-larysa.zaremba@intel.com/

Maybe go through the previous postings and check if the arguments are
still relevant? (or explain why we want more checksum now)

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-26  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-25  9:30 [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 0/5] Add the the capability to load HW RX checsum in eBPF programs Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-25  9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 1/5] netlink: specs: Add XDP RX checksum capability to XDP metadata specs Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-26  4:20   ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2025-09-26  8:59     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-09-26 22:53       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-09-26  9:53   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-09-27  0:35     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-27  0:41     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-25  9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 2/5] net: veth: Add xmo_rx_checksum callback to veth driver Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-25  9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 3/5] net: ice: Add xmo_rx_checksum callback Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-25  9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 4/5] selftests/bpf: Add selftest support for bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-25  9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum support to xdp_hw_metadat prog Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-25  9:51 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 0/5] Add the the capability to load HW RX checsum in eBPF programs Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-25 10:39   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-25 10:58     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-26 11:45       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-09-26 11:58         ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-26 12:55           ` Lorenzo Bianconi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aNYUqdaIJV1cvFCb@mini-arch \
    --to=stfomichev@gmail.com \
    --cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).