From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 1/5] netlink: specs: Add XDP RX checksum capability to XDP metadata specs
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 21:20:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNYUqdaIJV1cvFCb@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250925-bpf-xdp-meta-rxcksum-v2-1-6b3fe987ce91@kernel.org>
On 09/25, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> Introduce XDP RX checksum capability to XDP metadata specs. XDP RX
> checksum will be use by devices capable of exposing receive checksum
> result via bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum().
> Moreover, introduce xmo_rx_checksum netdev callback in order allow the
> eBPF program bounded to the device to retrieve the RX checksum result
> computed by the hw NIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml | 5 +++++
> include/net/xdp.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> net/core/xdp.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml b/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml
> index e00d3fa1c152d7165e9485d6d383a2cc9cef7cfd..00699bf4a7fdb67c6b9ee3548098b0c933fd39a4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml
> @@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ definitions:
> doc: |
> Device is capable of exposing receive packet VLAN tag via
> bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_vlan_tag().
> + -
> + name: checksum
> + doc: |
> + Device is capable of exposing receive checksum result via
> + bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum().
> -
> type: flags
> name: xsk-flags
> diff --git a/include/net/xdp.h b/include/net/xdp.h
> index aa742f413c358575396530879af4570dc3fc18de..9ab9ac10ae2074b70618a9d4f32544d8b9a30b63 100644
> --- a/include/net/xdp.h
> +++ b/include/net/xdp.h
> @@ -586,6 +586,10 @@ void xdp_attachment_setup(struct xdp_attachment_info *info,
> NETDEV_XDP_RX_METADATA_VLAN_TAG, \
> bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_vlan_tag, \
> xmo_rx_vlan_tag) \
> + XDP_METADATA_KFUNC(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_CHECKSUM, \
> + NETDEV_XDP_RX_METADATA_CHECKSUM, \
> + bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum, \
> + xmo_rx_checksum)
>
> enum xdp_rx_metadata {
> #define XDP_METADATA_KFUNC(name, _, __, ___) name,
> @@ -643,12 +647,22 @@ enum xdp_rss_hash_type {
> XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_SCTP_EX = XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_SCTP | XDP_RSS_L3_DYNHDR,
> };
>
> +enum xdp_checksum {
> + XDP_CHECKSUM_NONE = CHECKSUM_NONE,
> + XDP_CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY,
> + XDP_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE = CHECKSUM_COMPLETE,
> + XDP_CHECKSUM_PARTIAL = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL,
> +};
Btw, might be worth mentioning, awhile ago we had settled on a smaller set of
exposed types:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230811161509.19722-13-larysa.zaremba@intel.com/
Maybe go through the previous postings and check if the arguments are
still relevant? (or explain why we want more checksum now)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-26 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 9:30 [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 0/5] Add the the capability to load HW RX checsum in eBPF programs Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-25 9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 1/5] netlink: specs: Add XDP RX checksum capability to XDP metadata specs Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-26 4:20 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2025-09-26 8:59 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-09-26 22:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-09-26 9:53 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-09-27 0:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-27 0:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-25 9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 2/5] net: veth: Add xmo_rx_checksum callback to veth driver Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-25 9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 3/5] net: ice: Add xmo_rx_checksum callback Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-25 9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 4/5] selftests/bpf: Add selftest support for bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-25 9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum support to xdp_hw_metadat prog Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-25 9:51 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 0/5] Add the the capability to load HW RX checsum in eBPF programs Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-25 10:39 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-09-25 10:58 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-26 11:45 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-09-26 11:58 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-26 12:55 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aNYUqdaIJV1cvFCb@mini-arch \
--to=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).