From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Cc: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@foss.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha@microchip.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: stmmac: stm32: add WoL from PHY support
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 09:21:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNjwGHrefA5j3dOp@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a318f055-059b-44a4-af28-2ffd80a779e6@broadcom.com>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 12:05:19PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> I like the direction this is going, we could probably take one step further
> and extract the logic present in bcmgenet_wol.c and make those helper
> functions for other drivers to get the overlay of PHY+MAC WoL
> options/password consistent across all drivers. What do you think?
The logic I've implemented is fairly similar, but with one difference:
I'm always storing the sopass, which means in the wol_get method I
don't have to be concerned with the sopass returned by the PHY.
This should be fine, unless the PHY was already configured for WoL
magicsecure, and in that case we'll return a zero SOPASS but indicating
WAKE_MAGICSECURE which probably isn't great.
So, my new get_wol logic is:
if (phylink_mac_supports_wol(pl)) {
if (phylink_phy_supports_wol(pl, pl->phydev))
phy_ethtool_get_wol(pl->phydev, wol);
/* Where the MAC augments the WoL support, merge its support and
* current configuration.
*/
if (~wol->wolopts & pl->wolopts_mac & WAKE_MAGICSECURE)
memcpy(wol->sopass, pl->wol_sopass,
sizeof(wol->sopass));
wol->supported |= pl->config->wol_mac_support;
wol->wolopts |= pl->wolopts_mac;
with:
static bool phylink_mac_supports_wol(struct phylink *pl)
{
return !!pl->mac_ops->mac_wol_set;
}
static bool phylink_phy_supports_wol(struct phylink *pl,
struct phy_device *phydev)
{
return phydev && (pl->config->wol_phy_legacy || phy_can_wakeup(phydev));
}
static inline bool phy_can_wakeup(struct phy_device *phydev)
{
return device_can_wakeup(&phydev->mdio.dev);
}
This is to cope with PHYs that respond to phy_ethtool_get_wol()
reporting that they support WoL but have no capability to actually wake
the system up. MACs can choose whether to override that by setting
phylink_config->wol_phy_legacy.
Much like taking this logic away from MAC driver authors, I think we
need to take the logic around "can this PHY actually wake-up the
system" away from the PHY driver author. I believe every driver that
supports WoL with the exception of realtek and broadcom.c reports that
WoL is supported and accepts set_wol() even when they're not capable
of waking the system. e.g. bcm_phy_get_wol():
wol->supported = BCM54XX_WOL_SUPPORTED_MASK;
wol->wolopts = 0;
with no prior checks. This is why the "phylink_phy_supports_wol()"
logic above is necessary, otherwise implementing this "use either
the PHY or MAC" logic will break stuff.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-28 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-17 15:36 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: add WoL from PHY support for stm32mp135f-dk Gatien Chevallier
2025-09-17 15:36 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] dt-bindings: net: document st,phy-wol property Gatien Chevallier
2025-09-22 17:05 ` Rob Herring
2025-09-23 8:02 ` Gatien CHEVALLIER
2025-09-17 15:36 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: stmmac: stm32: add WoL from PHY support Gatien Chevallier
2025-09-17 16:31 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-18 12:46 ` Gatien CHEVALLIER
2025-09-18 13:59 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-18 15:07 ` Gatien CHEVALLIER
2025-09-18 15:36 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-23 8:11 ` Gatien CHEVALLIER
2025-09-18 15:34 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-09-23 8:20 ` Gatien CHEVALLIER
2025-09-26 17:59 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-26 19:05 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-09-27 21:04 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-09-27 22:19 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-28 8:21 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2025-09-17 15:36 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: phy: smsc: fix and improve WoL support Gatien Chevallier
2025-09-17 15:54 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-17 15:36 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] arm: dts: st: activate ETH1 WoL from PHY on stm32mp135f-dk Gatien Chevallier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aNjwGHrefA5j3dOp@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=Tristram.Ha@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=christophe.roullier@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).