* [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl
@ 2025-09-29 6:33 D. Wythe
2025-09-29 6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] bpf: export necessary symbols for modules with struct_ops D. Wythe
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: D. Wythe @ 2025-09-29 6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, pabeni, song, sdf, haoluo, yhs,
edumazet, john.fastabend, kpsingh, jolsa, mjambigi, wenjia,
wintera, dust.li, tonylu, guwen
Cc: bpf, davem, kuba, netdev, sidraya, jaka
This patch aims to introduce BPF injection capabilities for SMC and
includes a self-test to ensure code stability.
Since the SMC protocol isn't ideal for every situation, especially
short-lived ones, most applications can't guarantee the absence of
such scenarios. Consequently, applications may need specific strategies
to decide whether to use SMC. For example, an application might limit SMC
usage to certain IP addresses or ports.
To maintain the principle of transparent replacement, we want applications
to remain unaffected even if they need specific SMC strategies. In other
words, they should not require recompilation of their code.
Additionally, we need to ensure the scalability of strategy implementation.
While using socket options or sysctl might be straightforward, it could
complicate future expansions.
Fortunately, BPF addresses these concerns effectively. Users can write
their own strategies in eBPF to determine whether to use SMC, and they can
easily modify those strategies in the future.
This is a rework of the series from [1]. Changes since [1] are limited to
the SMC parts:
1. Rename smc_ops to smc_hs_ctrl and change interface name.
2. Squash SMC patches, removing standalone non-BPF hook capability.
3. Fix typos
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250123015942.94810-1-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com/#t
v2 -> v1:
- Removed the fixes patch, which have already been merged on current branch.
- Fixed compilation warning of smc_call_hsbpf() when CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF
is not enabled.
- Changed the default value of CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF to Y.
- Fix typo and renamed some variables
v3 -> v2:
- Removed the libbpf patch, which have already been merged on current branch.
- Fixed sparse warning of smc_call_hsbpf() and xchg().
D. Wythe (3):
bpf: export necessary symbols for modules with struct_ops
net/smc: bpf: Introduce generic hook for handshake flow
bpf/selftests: add selftest for bpf_smc_hs_ctrl
include/net/netns/smc.h | 3 +
include/net/smc.h | 53 +++
kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 2 +
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 1 +
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 36 +-
net/smc/Kconfig | 10 +
net/smc/Makefile | 1 +
net/smc/af_smc.c | 10 +
net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c | 137 ++++++
net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.h | 31 ++
net/smc/smc_sysctl.c | 91 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config | 4 +
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c | 396 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_smc.c | 117 ++++++
14 files changed, 878 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c
create mode 100644 net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.h
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_smc.c
--
2.45.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] bpf: export necessary symbols for modules with struct_ops
2025-09-29 6:33 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
@ 2025-09-29 6:33 ` D. Wythe
2025-09-29 6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] net/smc: bpf: Introduce generic hook for handshake flow D. Wythe
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: D. Wythe @ 2025-09-29 6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, pabeni, song, sdf, haoluo, yhs,
edumazet, john.fastabend, kpsingh, jolsa, mjambigi, wenjia,
wintera, dust.li, tonylu, guwen
Cc: bpf, davem, kuba, netdev, sidraya, jaka
Exports three necessary symbols for implementing struct_ops with
tristate subsystem.
To hold or release refcnt of struct_ops refcnt by inline funcs
bpf_try_module_get and bpf_module_put which use bpf_struct_ops_get(put)
conditionally.
And to copy obj name from one to the other with effective checks by
bpf_obj_name_cpy.
Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
---
kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 2 ++
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index a41e6730edcf..278490683d28 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -1162,6 +1162,7 @@ bool bpf_struct_ops_get(const void *kdata)
map = __bpf_map_inc_not_zero(&st_map->map, false);
return !IS_ERR(map);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_struct_ops_get);
void bpf_struct_ops_put(const void *kdata)
{
@@ -1173,6 +1174,7 @@ void bpf_struct_ops_put(const void *kdata)
bpf_map_put(&st_map->map);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_struct_ops_put);
u32 bpf_struct_ops_id(const void *kdata)
{
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 3f178a0f8eb1..e8ffde2596db 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1204,6 +1204,7 @@ int bpf_obj_name_cpy(char *dst, const char *src, unsigned int size)
return src - orig_src;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_obj_name_cpy);
int map_check_no_btf(const struct bpf_map *map,
const struct btf *btf,
--
2.45.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] net/smc: bpf: Introduce generic hook for handshake flow
2025-09-29 6:33 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
2025-09-29 6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] bpf: export necessary symbols for modules with struct_ops D. Wythe
@ 2025-09-29 6:33 ` D. Wythe
2025-09-29 14:21 ` Dust Li
2025-09-29 6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] bpf/selftests: add selftest for bpf_smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
2025-10-28 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: D. Wythe @ 2025-09-29 6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, pabeni, song, sdf, haoluo, yhs,
edumazet, john.fastabend, kpsingh, jolsa, mjambigi, wenjia,
wintera, dust.li, tonylu, guwen
Cc: bpf, davem, kuba, netdev, sidraya, jaka
The introduction of IPPROTO_SMC enables eBPF programs to determine
whether to use SMC based on the context of socket creation, such as
network namespaces, PID and comm name, etc.
As a subsequent enhancement, to introduce a new generic hook that
allows decisions on whether to use SMC or not at runtime, including
but not limited to local/remote IP address or ports.
User can write their own implememtion via bpf_struct_ops now to choose
whether to use SMC or not before TCP 3rd handshake to be comleted.
Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
---
include/net/netns/smc.h | 3 +
include/net/smc.h | 53 ++++++++++++++++
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 36 +++++++----
net/smc/Kconfig | 10 +++
net/smc/Makefile | 1 +
net/smc/af_smc.c | 10 +++
net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.h | 31 +++++++++
net/smc/smc_sysctl.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
9 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c
create mode 100644 net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.h
diff --git a/include/net/netns/smc.h b/include/net/netns/smc.h
index fc752a50f91b..d66bfd392254 100644
--- a/include/net/netns/smc.h
+++ b/include/net/netns/smc.h
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ struct netns_smc {
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
struct ctl_table_header *smc_hdr;
#endif
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
+ struct smc_hs_ctrl __rcu *hs_ctrl;
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
unsigned int sysctl_autocorking_size;
unsigned int sysctl_smcr_buf_type;
int sysctl_smcr_testlink_time;
diff --git a/include/net/smc.h b/include/net/smc.h
index db84e4e35080..d599f8a74043 100644
--- a/include/net/smc.h
+++ b/include/net/smc.h
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
#include "linux/ism.h"
struct sock;
+struct tcp_sock;
+struct inet_request_sock;
#define SMC_MAX_PNETID_LEN 16 /* Max. length of PNET id */
@@ -97,4 +99,55 @@ struct smcd_dev {
u8 going_away : 1;
};
+#define SMC_HS_CTRL_NAME_MAX 16
+
+enum {
+ /* ops can be inherit from init_net */
+ SMC_HS_CTRL_FLAG_INHERITABLE = 0x1,
+
+ SMC_HS_CTRL_ALL_FLAGS = SMC_HS_CTRL_FLAG_INHERITABLE,
+};
+
+struct smc_hs_ctrl {
+ /* private */
+
+ struct list_head list;
+ struct module *owner;
+
+ /* public */
+
+ /* unique name */
+ char name[SMC_HS_CTRL_NAME_MAX];
+ int flags;
+
+ /* Invoked before computing SMC option for SYN packets.
+ * We can control whether to set SMC options by returning various value.
+ * Return 0 to disable SMC, or return any other value to enable it.
+ */
+ int (*syn_option)(struct tcp_sock *tp);
+
+ /* Invoked before Set up SMC options for SYN-ACK packets
+ * We can control whether to respond SMC options by returning various
+ * value. Return 0 to disable SMC, or return any other value to enable
+ * it.
+ */
+ int (*synack_option)(const struct tcp_sock *tp,
+ struct inet_request_sock *ireq);
+};
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
+#define smc_call_hsbpf(init_val, sk, func, ...) ({ \
+ typeof(init_val) __ret = (init_val); \
+ struct smc_hs_ctrl *ctrl; \
+ rcu_read_lock(); \
+ ctrl = rcu_dereference(sock_net(sk)->smc.hs_ctrl); \
+ if (ctrl && ctrl->func) \
+ __ret = ctrl->func(__VA_ARGS__); \
+ rcu_read_unlock(); \
+ __ret; \
+})
+#else
+#define smc_call_hsbpf(init_val, sk, ...) ({ (void)(sk); (init_val); })
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
+
#endif /* _SMC_H */
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index caf11920a878..e4ee138044d3 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#include <net/tcp.h>
#include <net/mptcp.h>
+#include <net/smc.h>
#include <net/proto_memory.h>
#include <linux/compiler.h>
@@ -764,34 +765,41 @@ static void tcp_options_write(struct tcphdr *th, struct tcp_sock *tp,
mptcp_options_write(th, ptr, tp, opts);
}
-static void smc_set_option(const struct tcp_sock *tp,
+static void smc_set_option(struct tcp_sock *tp,
struct tcp_out_options *opts,
unsigned int *remaining)
{
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC)
- if (static_branch_unlikely(&tcp_have_smc)) {
- if (tp->syn_smc) {
- if (*remaining >= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED) {
- opts->options |= OPTION_SMC;
- *remaining -= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED;
- }
+ struct sock *sk = &tp->inet_conn.icsk_inet.sk;
+
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&tcp_have_smc) && tp->syn_smc) {
+ tp->syn_smc = !!smc_call_hsbpf(1, sk, syn_option, tp);
+ /* re-check syn_smc */
+ if (tp->syn_smc &&
+ *remaining >= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED) {
+ opts->options |= OPTION_SMC;
+ *remaining -= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED;
}
}
#endif
}
static void smc_set_option_cond(const struct tcp_sock *tp,
- const struct inet_request_sock *ireq,
+ struct inet_request_sock *ireq,
struct tcp_out_options *opts,
unsigned int *remaining)
{
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC)
- if (static_branch_unlikely(&tcp_have_smc)) {
- if (tp->syn_smc && ireq->smc_ok) {
- if (*remaining >= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED) {
- opts->options |= OPTION_SMC;
- *remaining -= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED;
- }
+ const struct sock *sk = &tp->inet_conn.icsk_inet.sk;
+
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&tcp_have_smc) && tp->syn_smc && ireq->smc_ok) {
+ ireq->smc_ok = !!smc_call_hsbpf(1, sk, synack_option,
+ tp, ireq);
+ /* re-check smc_ok */
+ if (ireq->smc_ok &&
+ *remaining >= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED) {
+ opts->options |= OPTION_SMC;
+ *remaining -= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED;
}
}
#endif
diff --git a/net/smc/Kconfig b/net/smc/Kconfig
index ba5e6a2dd2fd..67edeb927e19 100644
--- a/net/smc/Kconfig
+++ b/net/smc/Kconfig
@@ -33,3 +33,13 @@ config SMC_LO
of architecture or hardware.
if unsure, say N.
+
+config SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF
+ bool "Generic eBPF hook for SMC handshake flow"
+ depends on SMC && BPF_SYSCALL
+ default y
+ help
+ SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF enables support to register generic eBPF hook for SMC
+ handshake flow, which offer much greater flexibility in modifying the behavior
+ of the SMC protocol stack compared to a complete kernel-based approach. Select
+ this option if you want filtring the handshake process via eBPF programs.
diff --git a/net/smc/Makefile b/net/smc/Makefile
index 60f1c87d5212..57b919434df4 100644
--- a/net/smc/Makefile
+++ b/net/smc/Makefile
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ smc-y += smc_cdc.o smc_tx.o smc_rx.o smc_close.o smc_ism.o smc_netlink.o smc_sta
smc-y += smc_tracepoint.o smc_inet.o
smc-$(CONFIG_SYSCTL) += smc_sysctl.o
smc-$(CONFIG_SMC_LO) += smc_loopback.o
+smc-$(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF) += smc_hs_bpf.o
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index e0e48f24cd61..ecc6499b05fa 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
#include "smc_sysctl.h"
#include "smc_loopback.h"
#include "smc_inet.h"
+#include "smc_hs_bpf.h"
static DEFINE_MUTEX(smc_server_lgr_pending); /* serialize link group
* creation on server
@@ -3609,8 +3610,17 @@ static int __init smc_init(void)
pr_err("%s: smc_inet_init fails with %d\n", __func__, rc);
goto out_ulp;
}
+ rc = bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_init();
+ if (rc) {
+ pr_err("%s: bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_init fails with %d\n", __func__,
+ rc);
+ goto out_inet;
+ }
+
static_branch_enable(&tcp_have_smc);
return 0;
+out_inet:
+ smc_inet_exit();
out_ulp:
tcp_unregister_ulp(&smc_ulp_ops);
out_lo:
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c b/net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4aa6d38da122
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Shared Memory Communications over RDMA (SMC-R) and RoCE
+ *
+ * Generic hook for SMC handshake flow.
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
+ * Copyright (c) 2025, Alibaba Inc.
+ *
+ * Author: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bpf_verifier.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <linux/btf.h>
+#include <linux/rculist.h>
+
+#include "smc_hs_bpf.h"
+
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(smc_hs_ctrl_list_lock);
+static LIST_HEAD(smc_hs_ctrl_list);
+
+static int smc_hs_ctrl_reg(struct smc_hs_ctrl *ctrl)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ spin_lock(&smc_hs_ctrl_list_lock);
+ /* already exist or duplicate name */
+ if (smc_hs_ctrl_find_by_name(ctrl->name))
+ ret = -EEXIST;
+ else
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&ctrl->list, &smc_hs_ctrl_list);
+ spin_unlock(&smc_hs_ctrl_list_lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void smc_hs_ctrl_unreg(struct smc_hs_ctrl *ctrl)
+{
+ spin_lock(&smc_hs_ctrl_list_lock);
+ list_del_rcu(&ctrl->list);
+ spin_unlock(&smc_hs_ctrl_list_lock);
+
+ /* Ensure that all readers to complete */
+ synchronize_rcu();
+}
+
+struct smc_hs_ctrl *smc_hs_ctrl_find_by_name(const char *name)
+{
+ struct smc_hs_ctrl *ctrl;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(ctrl, &smc_hs_ctrl_list, list) {
+ if (strcmp(ctrl->name, name) == 0)
+ return ctrl;
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static int __smc_bpf_stub_set_tcp_option(struct tcp_sock *tp) { return 1; }
+static int __smc_bpf_stub_set_tcp_option_cond(const struct tcp_sock *tp,
+ struct inet_request_sock *ireq)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static struct smc_hs_ctrl __smc_bpf_hs_ctrl = {
+ .syn_option = __smc_bpf_stub_set_tcp_option,
+ .synack_option = __smc_bpf_stub_set_tcp_option_cond,
+};
+
+static int smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_init(struct btf *btf) { return 0; }
+
+static int smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+ return smc_hs_ctrl_reg(kdata);
+}
+
+static void smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+ smc_hs_ctrl_unreg(kdata);
+}
+
+static int smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
+ const struct btf_member *member,
+ void *kdata, const void *udata)
+{
+ const struct smc_hs_ctrl *u_ctrl;
+ struct smc_hs_ctrl *k_ctrl;
+ u32 moff;
+
+ u_ctrl = (const struct smc_hs_ctrl *)udata;
+ k_ctrl = (struct smc_hs_ctrl *)kdata;
+
+ moff = __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8;
+ switch (moff) {
+ case offsetof(struct smc_hs_ctrl, name):
+ if (bpf_obj_name_cpy(k_ctrl->name, u_ctrl->name,
+ sizeof(u_ctrl->name)) <= 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ return 1;
+ case offsetof(struct smc_hs_ctrl, flags):
+ if (u_ctrl->flags & ~SMC_HS_CTRL_ALL_FLAGS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ k_ctrl->flags = u_ctrl->flags;
+ return 1;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_func_proto *
+bpf_smc_hs_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id, prog);
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_verifier_ops smc_bpf_verifier_ops = {
+ .get_func_proto = bpf_smc_hs_func_proto,
+ .is_valid_access = bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access,
+};
+
+static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_ops = {
+ .name = "smc_hs_ctrl",
+ .init = smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_init,
+ .reg = smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_reg,
+ .unreg = smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_unreg,
+ .cfi_stubs = &__smc_bpf_hs_ctrl,
+ .verifier_ops = &smc_bpf_verifier_ops,
+ .init_member = smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_init_member,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+int bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_init(void)
+{
+ return register_bpf_struct_ops(&bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_ops, smc_hs_ctrl);
+}
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.h b/net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f5f1807c079e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.h
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Shared Memory Communications over RDMA (SMC-R) and RoCE
+ *
+ * Generic hook for SMC handshake flow.
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
+ * Copyright (c) 2025, Alibaba Inc.
+ *
+ * Author: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
+ */
+
+#ifndef __SMC_HS_CTRL
+#define __SMC_HS_CTRL
+
+#include <net/smc.h>
+
+/* Find hs_ctrl by the target name, which required to be a c-string.
+ * Return NULL if no such ctrl was found,otherwise, return a valid ctrl.
+ *
+ * Note: Caller MUST ensure it's was invoked under rcu_read_lock.
+ */
+struct smc_hs_ctrl *smc_hs_ctrl_find_by_name(const char *name);
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
+int bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_init(void);
+#else
+static inline int bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_init(void) { return 0; }
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
+
+#endif /* __SMC_HS_CTRL */
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c b/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c
index 2fab6456f765..918516734468 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c
@@ -12,12 +12,14 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/sysctl.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <net/net_namespace.h>
#include "smc.h"
#include "smc_core.h"
#include "smc_llc.h"
#include "smc_sysctl.h"
+#include "smc_hs_bpf.h"
static int min_sndbuf = SMC_BUF_MIN_SIZE;
static int min_rcvbuf = SMC_BUF_MIN_SIZE;
@@ -30,6 +32,69 @@ static int links_per_lgr_max = SMC_LINKS_ADD_LNK_MAX;
static int conns_per_lgr_min = SMC_CONN_PER_LGR_MIN;
static int conns_per_lgr_max = SMC_CONN_PER_LGR_MAX;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
+static int smc_net_replace_smc_hs_ctrl(struct net *net, const char *name)
+{
+ struct smc_hs_ctrl *ctrl = NULL;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ /* null or empty name ask to clear current ctrl */
+ if (name && name[0]) {
+ ctrl = smc_hs_ctrl_find_by_name(name);
+ if (!ctrl) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ /* no change, just return */
+ if (ctrl == rcu_dereference(net->smc.hs_ctrl)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return 0;
+ }
+ if (!bpf_try_module_get(ctrl, ctrl->owner)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+ }
+ /* xhcg old ctrl with the new one atomically */
+ ctrl = unrcu_pointer(xchg(&net->smc.hs_ctrl, RCU_INITIALIZER(ctrl)));
+ /* release old ctrl */
+ if (ctrl)
+ bpf_module_put(ctrl, ctrl->owner);
+
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int proc_smc_hs_ctrl(const struct ctl_table *ctl, int write,
+ void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+ struct net *net = container_of(ctl->data, struct net, smc.hs_ctrl);
+ char val[SMC_HS_CTRL_NAME_MAX];
+ const struct ctl_table tbl = {
+ .data = val,
+ .maxlen = SMC_HS_CTRL_NAME_MAX,
+ };
+ struct smc_hs_ctrl *ctrl;
+ int ret;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ ctrl = rcu_dereference(net->smc.hs_ctrl);
+ if (ctrl)
+ memcpy(val, ctrl->name, sizeof(ctrl->name));
+ else
+ val[0] = '\0';
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ ret = proc_dostring(&tbl, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (write)
+ ret = smc_net_replace_smc_hs_ctrl(net, val);
+ return ret;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
+
static struct ctl_table smc_table[] = {
{
.procname = "autocorking_size",
@@ -99,6 +164,15 @@ static struct ctl_table smc_table[] = {
.extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
.extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
},
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
+ {
+ .procname = "hs_ctrl",
+ .data = &init_net.smc.hs_ctrl,
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .maxlen = SMC_HS_CTRL_NAME_MAX,
+ .proc_handler = proc_smc_hs_ctrl,
+ },
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
};
int __net_init smc_sysctl_net_init(struct net *net)
@@ -109,6 +183,16 @@ int __net_init smc_sysctl_net_init(struct net *net)
table = smc_table;
if (!net_eq(net, &init_net)) {
int i;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
+ struct smc_hs_ctrl *ctrl;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ ctrl = rcu_dereference(init_net.smc.hs_ctrl);
+ if (ctrl && ctrl->flags & SMC_HS_CTRL_FLAG_INHERITABLE &&
+ bpf_try_module_get(ctrl, ctrl->owner))
+ rcu_assign_pointer(net->smc.hs_ctrl, ctrl);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
table = kmemdup(table, sizeof(smc_table), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!table)
@@ -139,6 +223,9 @@ int __net_init smc_sysctl_net_init(struct net *net)
if (!net_eq(net, &init_net))
kfree(table);
err_alloc:
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
+ smc_net_replace_smc_hs_ctrl(net, NULL);
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -148,6 +235,10 @@ void __net_exit smc_sysctl_net_exit(struct net *net)
table = net->smc.smc_hdr->ctl_table_arg;
unregister_net_sysctl_table(net->smc.smc_hdr);
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
+ smc_net_replace_smc_hs_ctrl(net, NULL);
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
+
if (!net_eq(net, &init_net))
kfree(table);
}
--
2.45.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] bpf/selftests: add selftest for bpf_smc_hs_ctrl
2025-09-29 6:33 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
2025-09-29 6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] bpf: export necessary symbols for modules with struct_ops D. Wythe
2025-09-29 6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] net/smc: bpf: Introduce generic hook for handshake flow D. Wythe
@ 2025-09-29 6:34 ` D. Wythe
2025-10-28 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: D. Wythe @ 2025-09-29 6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, pabeni, song, sdf, haoluo, yhs,
edumazet, john.fastabend, kpsingh, jolsa, mjambigi, wenjia,
wintera, dust.li, tonylu, guwen
Cc: bpf, davem, kuba, netdev, sidraya, jaka
This tests introduces a tiny smc_hs_ctrl for filtering SMC connections
based on IP pairs, and also adds a realistic topology model to verify it.
Also, we can only use SMC loopback under CI test, so an additional
configuration needs to be enabled.
Follow the steps below to run this test.
make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf
cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf
sudo ./test_progs -t smc
Results shows:
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Tested-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config | 4 +
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c | 396 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_smc.c | 117 ++++++
3 files changed, 517 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_smc.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
index 70b28c1e653e..9a0cee79fc23 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
@@ -123,3 +123,7 @@ CONFIG_XDP_SOCKETS=y
CONFIG_XFRM_INTERFACE=y
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_DCTCP=y
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_BBR=y
+CONFIG_INFINIBAND=y
+CONFIG_SMC=y
+CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF=y
+CONFIG_SMC_LO=y
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ccf68aefa6fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,396 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <linux/genetlink.h>
+#include "network_helpers.h"
+#include "bpf_smc.skel.h"
+
+#ifndef IPPROTO_SMC
+#define IPPROTO_SMC 256
+#endif
+
+#define CLIENT_IP "127.0.0.1"
+#define SERVER_IP "127.0.1.0"
+#define SERVER_IP_VIA_RISK_PATH "127.0.2.0"
+
+#define SERVICE_1 80
+#define SERVICE_2 443
+#define SERVICE_3 8443
+
+#define TEST_NS "bpf_smc_netns"
+
+static struct netns_obj *test_netns;
+
+struct smc_policy_ip_key {
+ __u32 sip;
+ __u32 dip;
+};
+
+struct smc_policy_ip_value {
+ __u8 mode;
+};
+
+#if defined(__s390x__)
+/* s390x has default seid */
+static bool setup_ueid(void) { return true; }
+static void cleanup_ueid(void) {}
+#else
+enum {
+ SMC_NETLINK_ADD_UEID = 10,
+ SMC_NETLINK_REMOVE_UEID
+};
+
+enum {
+ SMC_NLA_EID_TABLE_UNSPEC,
+ SMC_NLA_EID_TABLE_ENTRY, /* string */
+};
+
+struct msgtemplate {
+ struct nlmsghdr n;
+ struct genlmsghdr g;
+ char buf[1024];
+};
+
+#define GENLMSG_DATA(glh) ((void *)(NLMSG_DATA(glh) + GENL_HDRLEN))
+#define GENLMSG_PAYLOAD(glh) (NLMSG_PAYLOAD(glh, 0) - GENL_HDRLEN)
+#define NLA_DATA(na) ((void *)((char *)(na) + NLA_HDRLEN))
+#define NLA_PAYLOAD(len) ((len) - NLA_HDRLEN)
+
+#define SMC_GENL_FAMILY_NAME "SMC_GEN_NETLINK"
+#define SMC_BPFTEST_UEID "SMC-BPFTEST-UEID"
+
+static uint16_t smc_nl_family_id = -1;
+
+static int send_cmd(int fd, __u16 nlmsg_type, __u32 nlmsg_pid,
+ __u16 nlmsg_flags, __u8 genl_cmd, __u16 nla_type,
+ void *nla_data, int nla_len)
+{
+ struct nlattr *na;
+ struct sockaddr_nl nladdr;
+ int r, buflen;
+ char *buf;
+
+ struct msgtemplate msg = {0};
+
+ msg.n.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(GENL_HDRLEN);
+ msg.n.nlmsg_type = nlmsg_type;
+ msg.n.nlmsg_flags = nlmsg_flags;
+ msg.n.nlmsg_seq = 0;
+ msg.n.nlmsg_pid = nlmsg_pid;
+ msg.g.cmd = genl_cmd;
+ msg.g.version = 1;
+ na = (struct nlattr *)GENLMSG_DATA(&msg);
+ na->nla_type = nla_type;
+ na->nla_len = nla_len + 1 + NLA_HDRLEN;
+ memcpy(NLA_DATA(na), nla_data, nla_len);
+ msg.n.nlmsg_len += NLMSG_ALIGN(na->nla_len);
+
+ buf = (char *)&msg;
+ buflen = msg.n.nlmsg_len;
+ memset(&nladdr, 0, sizeof(nladdr));
+ nladdr.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
+
+ while ((r = sendto(fd, buf, buflen, 0, (struct sockaddr *)&nladdr,
+ sizeof(nladdr))) < buflen) {
+ if (r > 0) {
+ buf += r;
+ buflen -= r;
+ } else if (errno != EAGAIN) {
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static bool get_smc_nl_family_id(void)
+{
+ struct sockaddr_nl nl_src;
+ struct msgtemplate msg;
+ struct nlattr *nl;
+ int fd, ret;
+ pid_t pid;
+
+ fd = socket(AF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, NETLINK_GENERIC);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(fd, "nl_family socket"))
+ return false;
+
+ pid = getpid();
+
+ memset(&nl_src, 0, sizeof(nl_src));
+ nl_src.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
+ nl_src.nl_pid = pid;
+
+ ret = bind(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&nl_src, sizeof(nl_src));
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "nl_family bind"))
+ goto fail;
+
+ ret = send_cmd(fd, GENL_ID_CTRL, pid,
+ NLM_F_REQUEST, CTRL_CMD_GETFAMILY,
+ CTRL_ATTR_FAMILY_NAME, (void *)SMC_GENL_FAMILY_NAME,
+ strlen(SMC_GENL_FAMILY_NAME));
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "nl_family query"))
+ goto fail;
+
+ ret = recv(fd, &msg, sizeof(msg), 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_FALSE(msg.n.nlmsg_type == NLMSG_ERROR || ret < 0 ||
+ !NLMSG_OK(&msg.n, ret), "nl_family response"))
+ goto fail;
+
+ nl = (struct nlattr *)GENLMSG_DATA(&msg);
+ nl = (struct nlattr *)((char *)nl + NLA_ALIGN(nl->nla_len));
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(nl->nla_type, CTRL_ATTR_FAMILY_ID, "nl_family nla type"))
+ goto fail;
+
+ smc_nl_family_id = *(uint16_t *)NLA_DATA(nl);
+ close(fd);
+ return true;
+fail:
+ close(fd);
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool smc_ueid(int op)
+{
+ struct sockaddr_nl nl_src;
+ struct msgtemplate msg;
+ struct nlmsgerr *err;
+ char test_ueid[32];
+ int fd, ret;
+ pid_t pid;
+
+ /* UEID required */
+ memset(test_ueid, '\x20', sizeof(test_ueid));
+ memcpy(test_ueid, SMC_BPFTEST_UEID, strlen(SMC_BPFTEST_UEID));
+ fd = socket(AF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, NETLINK_GENERIC);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(fd, "ueid socket"))
+ return false;
+
+ pid = getpid();
+ memset(&nl_src, 0, sizeof(nl_src));
+ nl_src.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
+ nl_src.nl_pid = pid;
+
+ ret = bind(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&nl_src, sizeof(nl_src));
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "ueid bind"))
+ goto fail;
+
+ ret = send_cmd(fd, smc_nl_family_id, pid,
+ NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK, op, SMC_NLA_EID_TABLE_ENTRY,
+ (void *)test_ueid, sizeof(test_ueid));
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "ueid cmd"))
+ goto fail;
+
+ ret = recv(fd, &msg, sizeof(msg), 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_FALSE(ret < 0 ||
+ !NLMSG_OK(&msg.n, ret), "ueid response"))
+ goto fail;
+
+ if (msg.n.nlmsg_type == NLMSG_ERROR) {
+ err = NLMSG_DATA(&msg);
+ switch (op) {
+ case SMC_NETLINK_REMOVE_UEID:
+ if (!ASSERT_FALSE((err->error && err->error != -ENOENT),
+ "ueid remove"))
+ goto fail;
+ break;
+ case SMC_NETLINK_ADD_UEID:
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err->error, "ueid add"))
+ goto fail;
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ close(fd);
+ return true;
+fail:
+ close(fd);
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool setup_ueid(void)
+{
+ /* get smc nl id */
+ if (!get_smc_nl_family_id())
+ return false;
+ /* clear old ueid for bpftest */
+ smc_ueid(SMC_NETLINK_REMOVE_UEID);
+ /* smc-loopback required ueid */
+ return smc_ueid(SMC_NETLINK_ADD_UEID);
+}
+
+static void cleanup_ueid(void)
+{
+ smc_ueid(SMC_NETLINK_REMOVE_UEID);
+}
+#endif /* __s390x__ */
+
+static bool setup_netns(void)
+{
+ test_netns = netns_new(TEST_NS, true);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(test_netns, "open net namespace"))
+ goto fail_netns;
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(system("ip addr add 127.0.1.0/8 dev lo"),
+ "add server node"))
+ goto fail_ip;
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(system("ip addr add 127.0.2.0/8 dev lo"),
+ "server via risk path"))
+ goto fail_ip;
+
+ return true;
+fail_ip:
+ netns_free(test_netns);
+fail_netns:
+ return false;
+}
+
+static void cleanup_netns(void)
+{
+ netns_free(test_netns);
+ remove_netns(TEST_NS);
+}
+
+static bool setup_smc(void)
+{
+ if (!setup_ueid())
+ return false;
+
+ if (!setup_netns())
+ goto fail_netns;
+
+ return true;
+fail_netns:
+ cleanup_ueid();
+ return false;
+}
+
+static int set_client_addr_cb(int fd, void *opts)
+{
+ const char *src = (const char *)opts;
+ struct sockaddr_in localaddr;
+
+ localaddr.sin_family = AF_INET;
+ localaddr.sin_port = htons(0);
+ localaddr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr(src);
+ return !ASSERT_OK(bind(fd, &localaddr, sizeof(localaddr)), "client bind");
+}
+
+static void run_link(const char *src, const char *dst, int port)
+{
+ struct network_helper_opts opts = {0};
+ int server, client;
+
+ server = start_server_str(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, dst, port, NULL);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(server, "start service_1"))
+ return;
+
+ opts.proto = IPPROTO_TCP;
+ opts.post_socket_cb = set_client_addr_cb;
+ opts.cb_opts = (void *)src;
+
+ client = connect_to_fd_opts(server, &opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(client, "start connect"))
+ goto fail_client;
+
+ close(client);
+fail_client:
+ close(server);
+}
+
+static void block_link(int map_fd, const char *src, const char *dst)
+{
+ struct smc_policy_ip_value val = { .mode = /* block */ 0 };
+ struct smc_policy_ip_key key = {
+ .sip = inet_addr(src),
+ .dip = inet_addr(dst),
+ };
+
+ bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &val, BPF_ANY);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This test describes a real-life service topology as follows:
+ *
+ * +-------------> service_1
+ * link 1 | |
+ * +--------------------> server | link 2
+ * | | V
+ * | +-------------> service_2
+ * | link 3
+ * client -------------------> server_via_unsafe_path -> service_3
+ *
+ * Among them,
+ * 1. link-1 is very suitable for using SMC.
+ * 2. link-2 is not suitable for using SMC, because the mode of this link is
+ * kind of short-link services.
+ * 3. link-3 is also not suitable for using SMC, because the RDMA link is
+ * unavailable and needs to go through a long timeout before it can fallback
+ * to TCP.
+ * To achieve this goal, we use a customized SMC ip strategy via smc_hs_ctrl.
+ */
+static void test_topo(void)
+{
+ struct bpf_smc *skel;
+ int rc, map_fd;
+
+ skel = bpf_smc__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_smc__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ rc = bpf_smc__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(rc, "bpf_smc__attach"))
+ goto fail;
+
+ map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.smc_policy_ip);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(map_fd, "bpf_map__fd"))
+ goto fail;
+
+ /* Mock the process of transparent replacement, since we will modify
+ * protocol to ipproto_smc accropding to it via
+ * fmod_ret/update_socket_protocol.
+ */
+ system("sysctl -w net.smc.hs_ctrl=linkcheck");
+
+ /* Configure ip strat */
+ block_link(map_fd, CLIENT_IP, SERVER_IP_VIA_RISK_PATH);
+ block_link(map_fd, SERVER_IP, SERVER_IP);
+
+ /* should go with smc */
+ run_link(CLIENT_IP, SERVER_IP, SERVICE_1);
+ /* should go with smc fallback */
+ run_link(SERVER_IP, SERVER_IP, SERVICE_2);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->smc_cnt, 2, "smc count");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fallback_cnt, 1, "fallback count");
+
+ /* should go with smc */
+ run_link(CLIENT_IP, SERVER_IP, SERVICE_2);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->smc_cnt, 3, "smc count");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fallback_cnt, 1, "fallback count");
+
+ /* should go with smc fallback */
+ run_link(CLIENT_IP, SERVER_IP_VIA_RISK_PATH, SERVICE_3);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->smc_cnt, 4, "smc count");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fallback_cnt, 2, "fallback count");
+
+fail:
+ bpf_smc__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void test_bpf_smc(void)
+{
+ if (!setup_smc()) {
+ printf("setup for smc test failed, test SKIP:\n");
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("topo"))
+ test_topo();
+
+ cleanup_ueid();
+ cleanup_netns();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_smc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_smc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3f1c41108b46
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_smc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "bpf_tracing_net.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+enum {
+ BPF_SMC_LISTEN = 10,
+};
+
+struct smc_sock___local {
+ struct sock sk;
+ struct smc_sock *listen_smc;
+ bool use_fallback;
+} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
+
+int smc_cnt = 0;
+int fallback_cnt = 0;
+
+SEC("fentry/smc_release")
+int BPF_PROG(bpf_smc_release, struct socket *sock)
+{
+ /* only count from one side (client) */
+ if (sock->sk->__sk_common.skc_state == BPF_SMC_LISTEN)
+ return 0;
+ smc_cnt++;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fentry/smc_switch_to_fallback")
+int BPF_PROG(bpf_smc_switch_to_fallback, struct smc_sock___local *smc)
+{
+ /* only count from one side (client) */
+ if (smc && !smc->listen_smc)
+ fallback_cnt++;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* go with default value if no strat was found */
+bool default_ip_strat_value = true;
+
+struct smc_policy_ip_key {
+ __u32 sip;
+ __u32 dip;
+};
+
+struct smc_policy_ip_value {
+ __u8 mode;
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+ __uint(key_size, sizeof(struct smc_policy_ip_key));
+ __uint(value_size, sizeof(struct smc_policy_ip_value));
+ __uint(max_entries, 128);
+ __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+} smc_policy_ip SEC(".maps");
+
+static bool smc_check(__u32 src, __u32 dst)
+{
+ struct smc_policy_ip_value *value;
+ struct smc_policy_ip_key key = {
+ .sip = src,
+ .dip = dst,
+ };
+
+ value = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&smc_policy_ip, &key);
+ return value ? value->mode : default_ip_strat_value;
+}
+
+SEC("fmod_ret/update_socket_protocol")
+int BPF_PROG(smc_run, int family, int type, int protocol)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task;
+
+ if (family != AF_INET && family != AF_INET6)
+ return protocol;
+
+ if ((type & 0xf) != SOCK_STREAM)
+ return protocol;
+
+ if (protocol != 0 && protocol != IPPROTO_TCP)
+ return protocol;
+
+ task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
+ /* Prevent from affecting other tests */
+ if (!task || !task->nsproxy->net_ns->smc.hs_ctrl)
+ return protocol;
+
+ return IPPROTO_SMC;
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/bpf_smc_set_tcp_option_cond")
+int BPF_PROG(bpf_smc_set_tcp_option_cond, const struct tcp_sock *tp,
+ struct inet_request_sock *ireq)
+{
+ return smc_check(ireq->req.__req_common.skc_daddr,
+ ireq->req.__req_common.skc_rcv_saddr);
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/bpf_smc_set_tcp_option")
+int BPF_PROG(bpf_smc_set_tcp_option, struct tcp_sock *tp)
+{
+ return smc_check(tp->inet_conn.icsk_inet.sk.__sk_common.skc_rcv_saddr,
+ tp->inet_conn.icsk_inet.sk.__sk_common.skc_daddr);
+}
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct smc_hs_ctrl linkcheck = {
+ .name = "linkcheck",
+ .syn_option = (void *)bpf_smc_set_tcp_option,
+ .synack_option = (void *)bpf_smc_set_tcp_option_cond,
+};
--
2.45.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] net/smc: bpf: Introduce generic hook for handshake flow
2025-09-29 6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] net/smc: bpf: Introduce generic hook for handshake flow D. Wythe
@ 2025-09-29 14:21 ` Dust Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dust Li @ 2025-09-29 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: D. Wythe, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, pabeni, song, sdf,
haoluo, yhs, edumazet, john.fastabend, kpsingh, jolsa, mjambigi,
wenjia, wintera, tonylu, guwen
Cc: bpf, davem, kuba, netdev, sidraya, jaka
On 2025-09-29 14:33:59, D. Wythe wrote:
>The introduction of IPPROTO_SMC enables eBPF programs to determine
>whether to use SMC based on the context of socket creation, such as
>network namespaces, PID and comm name, etc.
>
>As a subsequent enhancement, to introduce a new generic hook that
>allows decisions on whether to use SMC or not at runtime, including
>but not limited to local/remote IP address or ports.
>
>User can write their own implememtion via bpf_struct_ops now to choose
>whether to use SMC or not before TCP 3rd handshake to be comleted.
>
>Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Looks good to me, thanks for continuing to work on this!
Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
Best regards,
Dust
>---
> include/net/netns/smc.h | 3 +
> include/net/smc.h | 53 ++++++++++++++++
> net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 36 +++++++----
> net/smc/Kconfig | 10 +++
> net/smc/Makefile | 1 +
> net/smc/af_smc.c | 10 +++
> net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.h | 31 +++++++++
> net/smc/smc_sysctl.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 9 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c
> create mode 100644 net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.h
>
>diff --git a/include/net/netns/smc.h b/include/net/netns/smc.h
>index fc752a50f91b..d66bfd392254 100644
>--- a/include/net/netns/smc.h
>+++ b/include/net/netns/smc.h
>@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ struct netns_smc {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> struct ctl_table_header *smc_hdr;
> #endif
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
>+ struct smc_hs_ctrl __rcu *hs_ctrl;
>+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
> unsigned int sysctl_autocorking_size;
> unsigned int sysctl_smcr_buf_type;
> int sysctl_smcr_testlink_time;
>diff --git a/include/net/smc.h b/include/net/smc.h
>index db84e4e35080..d599f8a74043 100644
>--- a/include/net/smc.h
>+++ b/include/net/smc.h
>@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
> #include "linux/ism.h"
>
> struct sock;
>+struct tcp_sock;
>+struct inet_request_sock;
>
> #define SMC_MAX_PNETID_LEN 16 /* Max. length of PNET id */
>
>@@ -97,4 +99,55 @@ struct smcd_dev {
> u8 going_away : 1;
> };
>
>+#define SMC_HS_CTRL_NAME_MAX 16
>+
>+enum {
>+ /* ops can be inherit from init_net */
>+ SMC_HS_CTRL_FLAG_INHERITABLE = 0x1,
>+
>+ SMC_HS_CTRL_ALL_FLAGS = SMC_HS_CTRL_FLAG_INHERITABLE,
>+};
>+
>+struct smc_hs_ctrl {
>+ /* private */
>+
>+ struct list_head list;
>+ struct module *owner;
>+
>+ /* public */
>+
>+ /* unique name */
>+ char name[SMC_HS_CTRL_NAME_MAX];
>+ int flags;
>+
>+ /* Invoked before computing SMC option for SYN packets.
>+ * We can control whether to set SMC options by returning various value.
>+ * Return 0 to disable SMC, or return any other value to enable it.
>+ */
>+ int (*syn_option)(struct tcp_sock *tp);
>+
>+ /* Invoked before Set up SMC options for SYN-ACK packets
>+ * We can control whether to respond SMC options by returning various
>+ * value. Return 0 to disable SMC, or return any other value to enable
>+ * it.
>+ */
>+ int (*synack_option)(const struct tcp_sock *tp,
>+ struct inet_request_sock *ireq);
>+};
>+
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
>+#define smc_call_hsbpf(init_val, sk, func, ...) ({ \
>+ typeof(init_val) __ret = (init_val); \
>+ struct smc_hs_ctrl *ctrl; \
>+ rcu_read_lock(); \
>+ ctrl = rcu_dereference(sock_net(sk)->smc.hs_ctrl); \
>+ if (ctrl && ctrl->func) \
>+ __ret = ctrl->func(__VA_ARGS__); \
>+ rcu_read_unlock(); \
>+ __ret; \
>+})
>+#else
>+#define smc_call_hsbpf(init_val, sk, ...) ({ (void)(sk); (init_val); })
>+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
>+
> #endif /* _SMC_H */
>diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>index caf11920a878..e4ee138044d3 100644
>--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>
> #include <net/tcp.h>
> #include <net/mptcp.h>
>+#include <net/smc.h>
> #include <net/proto_memory.h>
>
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
>@@ -764,34 +765,41 @@ static void tcp_options_write(struct tcphdr *th, struct tcp_sock *tp,
> mptcp_options_write(th, ptr, tp, opts);
> }
>
>-static void smc_set_option(const struct tcp_sock *tp,
>+static void smc_set_option(struct tcp_sock *tp,
> struct tcp_out_options *opts,
> unsigned int *remaining)
> {
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC)
>- if (static_branch_unlikely(&tcp_have_smc)) {
>- if (tp->syn_smc) {
>- if (*remaining >= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED) {
>- opts->options |= OPTION_SMC;
>- *remaining -= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED;
>- }
>+ struct sock *sk = &tp->inet_conn.icsk_inet.sk;
>+
>+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&tcp_have_smc) && tp->syn_smc) {
>+ tp->syn_smc = !!smc_call_hsbpf(1, sk, syn_option, tp);
>+ /* re-check syn_smc */
>+ if (tp->syn_smc &&
>+ *remaining >= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED) {
>+ opts->options |= OPTION_SMC;
>+ *remaining -= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED;
> }
> }
> #endif
> }
>
> static void smc_set_option_cond(const struct tcp_sock *tp,
>- const struct inet_request_sock *ireq,
>+ struct inet_request_sock *ireq,
> struct tcp_out_options *opts,
> unsigned int *remaining)
> {
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC)
>- if (static_branch_unlikely(&tcp_have_smc)) {
>- if (tp->syn_smc && ireq->smc_ok) {
>- if (*remaining >= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED) {
>- opts->options |= OPTION_SMC;
>- *remaining -= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED;
>- }
>+ const struct sock *sk = &tp->inet_conn.icsk_inet.sk;
>+
>+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&tcp_have_smc) && tp->syn_smc && ireq->smc_ok) {
>+ ireq->smc_ok = !!smc_call_hsbpf(1, sk, synack_option,
>+ tp, ireq);
>+ /* re-check smc_ok */
>+ if (ireq->smc_ok &&
>+ *remaining >= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED) {
>+ opts->options |= OPTION_SMC;
>+ *remaining -= TCPOLEN_EXP_SMC_BASE_ALIGNED;
> }
> }
> #endif
>diff --git a/net/smc/Kconfig b/net/smc/Kconfig
>index ba5e6a2dd2fd..67edeb927e19 100644
>--- a/net/smc/Kconfig
>+++ b/net/smc/Kconfig
>@@ -33,3 +33,13 @@ config SMC_LO
> of architecture or hardware.
>
> if unsure, say N.
>+
>+config SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF
>+ bool "Generic eBPF hook for SMC handshake flow"
>+ depends on SMC && BPF_SYSCALL
>+ default y
>+ help
>+ SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF enables support to register generic eBPF hook for SMC
>+ handshake flow, which offer much greater flexibility in modifying the behavior
>+ of the SMC protocol stack compared to a complete kernel-based approach. Select
>+ this option if you want filtring the handshake process via eBPF programs.
>diff --git a/net/smc/Makefile b/net/smc/Makefile
>index 60f1c87d5212..57b919434df4 100644
>--- a/net/smc/Makefile
>+++ b/net/smc/Makefile
>@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ smc-y += smc_cdc.o smc_tx.o smc_rx.o smc_close.o smc_ism.o smc_netlink.o smc_sta
> smc-y += smc_tracepoint.o smc_inet.o
> smc-$(CONFIG_SYSCTL) += smc_sysctl.o
> smc-$(CONFIG_SMC_LO) += smc_loopback.o
>+smc-$(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF) += smc_hs_bpf.o
>diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
>index e0e48f24cd61..ecc6499b05fa 100644
>--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
>+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
>@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
> #include "smc_sysctl.h"
> #include "smc_loopback.h"
> #include "smc_inet.h"
>+#include "smc_hs_bpf.h"
>
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(smc_server_lgr_pending); /* serialize link group
> * creation on server
>@@ -3609,8 +3610,17 @@ static int __init smc_init(void)
> pr_err("%s: smc_inet_init fails with %d\n", __func__, rc);
> goto out_ulp;
> }
>+ rc = bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_init();
>+ if (rc) {
>+ pr_err("%s: bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_init fails with %d\n", __func__,
>+ rc);
>+ goto out_inet;
>+ }
>+
> static_branch_enable(&tcp_have_smc);
> return 0;
>+out_inet:
>+ smc_inet_exit();
> out_ulp:
> tcp_unregister_ulp(&smc_ulp_ops);
> out_lo:
>diff --git a/net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c b/net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c
>new file mode 100644
>index 000000000000..4aa6d38da122
>--- /dev/null
>+++ b/net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c
>@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
>+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>+/*
>+ * Shared Memory Communications over RDMA (SMC-R) and RoCE
>+ *
>+ * Generic hook for SMC handshake flow.
>+ *
>+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
>+ * Copyright (c) 2025, Alibaba Inc.
>+ *
>+ * Author: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
>+ */
>+
>+#include <linux/bpf_verifier.h>
>+#include <linux/bpf.h>
>+#include <linux/btf.h>
>+#include <linux/rculist.h>
>+
>+#include "smc_hs_bpf.h"
>+
>+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(smc_hs_ctrl_list_lock);
>+static LIST_HEAD(smc_hs_ctrl_list);
>+
>+static int smc_hs_ctrl_reg(struct smc_hs_ctrl *ctrl)
>+{
>+ int ret = 0;
>+
>+ spin_lock(&smc_hs_ctrl_list_lock);
>+ /* already exist or duplicate name */
>+ if (smc_hs_ctrl_find_by_name(ctrl->name))
>+ ret = -EEXIST;
>+ else
>+ list_add_tail_rcu(&ctrl->list, &smc_hs_ctrl_list);
>+ spin_unlock(&smc_hs_ctrl_list_lock);
>+ return ret;
>+}
>+
>+static void smc_hs_ctrl_unreg(struct smc_hs_ctrl *ctrl)
>+{
>+ spin_lock(&smc_hs_ctrl_list_lock);
>+ list_del_rcu(&ctrl->list);
>+ spin_unlock(&smc_hs_ctrl_list_lock);
>+
>+ /* Ensure that all readers to complete */
>+ synchronize_rcu();
>+}
>+
>+struct smc_hs_ctrl *smc_hs_ctrl_find_by_name(const char *name)
>+{
>+ struct smc_hs_ctrl *ctrl;
>+
>+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(ctrl, &smc_hs_ctrl_list, list) {
>+ if (strcmp(ctrl->name, name) == 0)
>+ return ctrl;
>+ }
>+ return NULL;
>+}
>+
>+static int __smc_bpf_stub_set_tcp_option(struct tcp_sock *tp) { return 1; }
>+static int __smc_bpf_stub_set_tcp_option_cond(const struct tcp_sock *tp,
>+ struct inet_request_sock *ireq)
>+{
>+ return 1;
>+}
>+
>+static struct smc_hs_ctrl __smc_bpf_hs_ctrl = {
>+ .syn_option = __smc_bpf_stub_set_tcp_option,
>+ .synack_option = __smc_bpf_stub_set_tcp_option_cond,
>+};
>+
>+static int smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_init(struct btf *btf) { return 0; }
>+
>+static int smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
>+{
>+ return smc_hs_ctrl_reg(kdata);
>+}
>+
>+static void smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
>+{
>+ smc_hs_ctrl_unreg(kdata);
>+}
>+
>+static int smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
>+ const struct btf_member *member,
>+ void *kdata, const void *udata)
>+{
>+ const struct smc_hs_ctrl *u_ctrl;
>+ struct smc_hs_ctrl *k_ctrl;
>+ u32 moff;
>+
>+ u_ctrl = (const struct smc_hs_ctrl *)udata;
>+ k_ctrl = (struct smc_hs_ctrl *)kdata;
>+
>+ moff = __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8;
>+ switch (moff) {
>+ case offsetof(struct smc_hs_ctrl, name):
>+ if (bpf_obj_name_cpy(k_ctrl->name, u_ctrl->name,
>+ sizeof(u_ctrl->name)) <= 0)
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+ return 1;
>+ case offsetof(struct smc_hs_ctrl, flags):
>+ if (u_ctrl->flags & ~SMC_HS_CTRL_ALL_FLAGS)
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+ k_ctrl->flags = u_ctrl->flags;
>+ return 1;
>+ default:
>+ break;
>+ }
>+
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static const struct bpf_func_proto *
>+bpf_smc_hs_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
>+{
>+ return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id, prog);
>+}
>+
>+static const struct bpf_verifier_ops smc_bpf_verifier_ops = {
>+ .get_func_proto = bpf_smc_hs_func_proto,
>+ .is_valid_access = bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access,
>+};
>+
>+static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_ops = {
>+ .name = "smc_hs_ctrl",
>+ .init = smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_init,
>+ .reg = smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_reg,
>+ .unreg = smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_unreg,
>+ .cfi_stubs = &__smc_bpf_hs_ctrl,
>+ .verifier_ops = &smc_bpf_verifier_ops,
>+ .init_member = smc_bpf_hs_ctrl_init_member,
>+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>+};
>+
>+int bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_init(void)
>+{
>+ return register_bpf_struct_ops(&bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_ops, smc_hs_ctrl);
>+}
>diff --git a/net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.h b/net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.h
>new file mode 100644
>index 000000000000..f5f1807c079e
>--- /dev/null
>+++ b/net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.h
>@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
>+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>+/*
>+ * Shared Memory Communications over RDMA (SMC-R) and RoCE
>+ *
>+ * Generic hook for SMC handshake flow.
>+ *
>+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
>+ * Copyright (c) 2025, Alibaba Inc.
>+ *
>+ * Author: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
>+ */
>+
>+#ifndef __SMC_HS_CTRL
>+#define __SMC_HS_CTRL
>+
>+#include <net/smc.h>
>+
>+/* Find hs_ctrl by the target name, which required to be a c-string.
>+ * Return NULL if no such ctrl was found,otherwise, return a valid ctrl.
>+ *
>+ * Note: Caller MUST ensure it's was invoked under rcu_read_lock.
>+ */
>+struct smc_hs_ctrl *smc_hs_ctrl_find_by_name(const char *name);
>+
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
>+int bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_init(void);
>+#else
>+static inline int bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_init(void) { return 0; }
>+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
>+
>+#endif /* __SMC_HS_CTRL */
>diff --git a/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c b/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c
>index 2fab6456f765..918516734468 100644
>--- a/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c
>+++ b/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c
>@@ -12,12 +12,14 @@
>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/sysctl.h>
>+#include <linux/bpf.h>
> #include <net/net_namespace.h>
>
> #include "smc.h"
> #include "smc_core.h"
> #include "smc_llc.h"
> #include "smc_sysctl.h"
>+#include "smc_hs_bpf.h"
>
> static int min_sndbuf = SMC_BUF_MIN_SIZE;
> static int min_rcvbuf = SMC_BUF_MIN_SIZE;
>@@ -30,6 +32,69 @@ static int links_per_lgr_max = SMC_LINKS_ADD_LNK_MAX;
> static int conns_per_lgr_min = SMC_CONN_PER_LGR_MIN;
> static int conns_per_lgr_max = SMC_CONN_PER_LGR_MAX;
>
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
>+static int smc_net_replace_smc_hs_ctrl(struct net *net, const char *name)
>+{
>+ struct smc_hs_ctrl *ctrl = NULL;
>+
>+ rcu_read_lock();
>+ /* null or empty name ask to clear current ctrl */
>+ if (name && name[0]) {
>+ ctrl = smc_hs_ctrl_find_by_name(name);
>+ if (!ctrl) {
>+ rcu_read_unlock();
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+ }
>+ /* no change, just return */
>+ if (ctrl == rcu_dereference(net->smc.hs_ctrl)) {
>+ rcu_read_unlock();
>+ return 0;
>+ }
>+ if (!bpf_try_module_get(ctrl, ctrl->owner)) {
>+ rcu_read_unlock();
>+ return -EBUSY;
>+ }
>+ }
>+ /* xhcg old ctrl with the new one atomically */
>+ ctrl = unrcu_pointer(xchg(&net->smc.hs_ctrl, RCU_INITIALIZER(ctrl)));
>+ /* release old ctrl */
>+ if (ctrl)
>+ bpf_module_put(ctrl, ctrl->owner);
>+
>+ rcu_read_unlock();
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static int proc_smc_hs_ctrl(const struct ctl_table *ctl, int write,
>+ void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
>+{
>+ struct net *net = container_of(ctl->data, struct net, smc.hs_ctrl);
>+ char val[SMC_HS_CTRL_NAME_MAX];
>+ const struct ctl_table tbl = {
>+ .data = val,
>+ .maxlen = SMC_HS_CTRL_NAME_MAX,
>+ };
>+ struct smc_hs_ctrl *ctrl;
>+ int ret;
>+
>+ rcu_read_lock();
>+ ctrl = rcu_dereference(net->smc.hs_ctrl);
>+ if (ctrl)
>+ memcpy(val, ctrl->name, sizeof(ctrl->name));
>+ else
>+ val[0] = '\0';
>+ rcu_read_unlock();
>+
>+ ret = proc_dostring(&tbl, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
>+ if (ret)
>+ return ret;
>+
>+ if (write)
>+ ret = smc_net_replace_smc_hs_ctrl(net, val);
>+ return ret;
>+}
>+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
>+
> static struct ctl_table smc_table[] = {
> {
> .procname = "autocorking_size",
>@@ -99,6 +164,15 @@ static struct ctl_table smc_table[] = {
> .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
> .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> },
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
>+ {
>+ .procname = "hs_ctrl",
>+ .data = &init_net.smc.hs_ctrl,
>+ .mode = 0644,
>+ .maxlen = SMC_HS_CTRL_NAME_MAX,
>+ .proc_handler = proc_smc_hs_ctrl,
>+ },
>+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
> };
>
> int __net_init smc_sysctl_net_init(struct net *net)
>@@ -109,6 +183,16 @@ int __net_init smc_sysctl_net_init(struct net *net)
> table = smc_table;
> if (!net_eq(net, &init_net)) {
> int i;
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
>+ struct smc_hs_ctrl *ctrl;
>+
>+ rcu_read_lock();
>+ ctrl = rcu_dereference(init_net.smc.hs_ctrl);
>+ if (ctrl && ctrl->flags & SMC_HS_CTRL_FLAG_INHERITABLE &&
>+ bpf_try_module_get(ctrl, ctrl->owner))
>+ rcu_assign_pointer(net->smc.hs_ctrl, ctrl);
>+ rcu_read_unlock();
>+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
>
> table = kmemdup(table, sizeof(smc_table), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!table)
>@@ -139,6 +223,9 @@ int __net_init smc_sysctl_net_init(struct net *net)
> if (!net_eq(net, &init_net))
> kfree(table);
> err_alloc:
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
>+ smc_net_replace_smc_hs_ctrl(net, NULL);
>+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
>@@ -148,6 +235,10 @@ void __net_exit smc_sysctl_net_exit(struct net *net)
>
> table = net->smc.smc_hdr->ctl_table_arg;
> unregister_net_sysctl_table(net->smc.smc_hdr);
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF)
>+ smc_net_replace_smc_hs_ctrl(net, NULL);
>+#endif /* CONFIG_SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF */
>+
> if (!net_eq(net, &init_net))
> kfree(table);
> }
>--
>2.45.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl
2025-09-29 6:33 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-29 6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] bpf/selftests: add selftest for bpf_smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
@ 2025-10-28 12:15 ` D. Wythe
2025-10-29 0:30 ` Martin KaFai Lau
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: D. Wythe @ 2025-10-28 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: D. Wythe, martin.lau, ast, andrii.nakryiko
Cc: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, pabeni, song, sdf, haoluo, yhs,
edumazet, john.fastabend, kpsingh, jolsa, mjambigi, wenjia,
wintera, dust.li, tonylu, guwen, bpf, davem, kuba, netdev,
sidraya, jaka
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 02:33:57PM +0800, D. Wythe wrote:
> This patch aims to introduce BPF injection capabilities for SMC and
> includes a self-test to ensure code stability.
>
> Since the SMC protocol isn't ideal for every situation, especially
> short-lived ones, most applications can't guarantee the absence of
> such scenarios. Consequently, applications may need specific strategies
> to decide whether to use SMC. For example, an application might limit SMC
> usage to certain IP addresses or ports.
>
> To maintain the principle of transparent replacement, we want applications
> to remain unaffected even if they need specific SMC strategies. In other
> words, they should not require recompilation of their code.
>
> Additionally, we need to ensure the scalability of strategy implementation.
> While using socket options or sysctl might be straightforward, it could
> complicate future expansions.
>
> Fortunately, BPF addresses these concerns effectively. Users can write
> their own strategies in eBPF to determine whether to use SMC, and they can
> easily modify those strategies in the future.
>
> This is a rework of the series from [1]. Changes since [1] are limited to
> the SMC parts:
>
> 1. Rename smc_ops to smc_hs_ctrl and change interface name.
> 2. Squash SMC patches, removing standalone non-BPF hook capability.
> 3. Fix typos
Hi bpf folks,
I've noticed this patch has been pending for a while, and I wanted to
gently check in. Is there any specific concerns or feedback regarding
it from the BPF side? I'm keen to address any issues and move it
forward.
Also, I'd appreciate your guidance on whether this patch should be
targeted for net-next.
Thanks for your time and consideration.
Best regards,
D. Wythe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl
2025-10-28 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
@ 2025-10-29 0:30 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-10-29 6:14 ` D. Wythe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin KaFai Lau @ 2025-10-29 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: D. Wythe
Cc: martin.lau, ast, andrii.nakryiko, daniel, andrii, pabeni, song,
sdf, haoluo, yhs, edumazet, john.fastabend, kpsingh, jolsa,
mjambigi, wenjia, wintera, dust.li, tonylu, guwen, bpf, davem,
kuba, netdev, sidraya, jaka
On 10/28/25 5:15 AM, D. Wythe wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 02:33:57PM +0800, D. Wythe wrote:
>> This patch aims to introduce BPF injection capabilities for SMC and
>> includes a self-test to ensure code stability.
>>
>> Since the SMC protocol isn't ideal for every situation, especially
>> short-lived ones, most applications can't guarantee the absence of
>> such scenarios. Consequently, applications may need specific strategies
>> to decide whether to use SMC. For example, an application might limit SMC
>> usage to certain IP addresses or ports.
>>
>> To maintain the principle of transparent replacement, we want applications
>> to remain unaffected even if they need specific SMC strategies. In other
>> words, they should not require recompilation of their code.
>>
>> Additionally, we need to ensure the scalability of strategy implementation.
>> While using socket options or sysctl might be straightforward, it could
>> complicate future expansions.
>>
>> Fortunately, BPF addresses these concerns effectively. Users can write
>> their own strategies in eBPF to determine whether to use SMC, and they can
>> easily modify those strategies in the future.
>>
>> This is a rework of the series from [1]. Changes since [1] are limited to
>> the SMC parts:
>>
>> 1. Rename smc_ops to smc_hs_ctrl and change interface name.
>> 2. Squash SMC patches, removing standalone non-BPF hook capability.
>> 3. Fix typos
>
>
> Hi bpf folks,
>
> I've noticed this patch has been pending for a while, and I wanted to
> gently check in. Is there any specific concerns or feedback regarding
> it from the BPF side? I'm keen to address any issues and move it
> forward.
The original v1 started last year. The bpf side had been responsive but
the progress stopped for months and the smc side review had been slow
also. I doubt how well will this be supported in the future and put this
to the bottom of my list since then.
The set does not apply on bpf-next/net now. Please re-spin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl
2025-10-29 0:30 ` Martin KaFai Lau
@ 2025-10-29 6:14 ` D. Wythe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: D. Wythe @ 2025-10-29 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin KaFai Lau
Cc: D. Wythe, ast, andrii.nakryiko, daniel, andrii, pabeni, song, sdf,
haoluo, yhs, edumazet, john.fastabend, kpsingh, jolsa, mjambigi,
wenjia, wintera, dust.li, tonylu, guwen, bpf, davem, kuba, netdev,
sidraya, jaka
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 05:30:12PM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 10/28/25 5:15 AM, D. Wythe wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 02:33:57PM +0800, D. Wythe wrote:
> >>This patch aims to introduce BPF injection capabilities for SMC and
> >>includes a self-test to ensure code stability.
> >>
> >>Since the SMC protocol isn't ideal for every situation, especially
> >>short-lived ones, most applications can't guarantee the absence of
> >
> >
> >Hi bpf folks,
> >
> >I've noticed this patch has been pending for a while, and I wanted to
> >gently check in. Is there any specific concerns or feedback regarding
> >it from the BPF side? I'm keen to address any issues and move it
> >forward.
>
> The original v1 started last year. The bpf side had been responsive
> but the progress stopped for months and the smc side review had been
> slow also. I doubt how well will this be supported in the future and
> put this to the bottom of my list since then.
>
> The set does not apply on bpf-next/net now. Please re-spin.
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your feedback and for surfacing these long-standing
concerns regarding the patchset. I fully appreciate your perspective on
its previous progress.
You're right that this patchset has been in the pipeline for a
significant amount of time, influenced by the past pace of SMC-side
reviews. However, the good news is that its future support should no
longer be a concern. Dust and I, along with two maintainers from IBM,
have been co-maintaining the SMC subsystem for some time now. From our
discussions, I believe that the IBM maintainers are in agreement
and open to the progress of this specific patchset, and Dust Li has already
provided an ACK. This collective and aligned support should effectively address
previous worries about SMC-side review.
Best regards,
D. Wythe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-29 6:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-29 6:33 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
2025-09-29 6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] bpf: export necessary symbols for modules with struct_ops D. Wythe
2025-09-29 6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] net/smc: bpf: Introduce generic hook for handshake flow D. Wythe
2025-09-29 14:21 ` Dust Li
2025-09-29 6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] bpf/selftests: add selftest for bpf_smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
2025-10-28 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
2025-10-29 0:30 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-10-29 6:14 ` D. Wythe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).