From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sdubroca@redhat.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
bridge@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 1/4] net: add a common function to compute features from lowers devices
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 03:03:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aO8PBOMk_EqyaGKN@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aO5X7368r8veRe5J@horms.kernel.org>
Hi Simon,
Thanks for the comments, I will fix all of them.
Regards
Hangbin
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 03:02:23PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 08:02:14AM +0000, Hangbin Liu wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index a64cef2c537e..54f0e792fbd2 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -12616,6 +12616,101 @@ netdev_features_t netdev_increment_features(netdev_features_t all,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_increment_features);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * netdev_compute_features_from_lowers - compute feature from lowers
> > + * @dev: the upper device
> > + * @update_header: whether to update upper device's header_len/headroom/tailroom
> > + *
> > + * Recompute the upper device's feature based on all lower devices.
> > + */
> > +void netdev_compute_features_from_lowers(struct net_device *dev, bool update_header)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int dst_release_flag = IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE | IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE_PERM;
> > + netdev_features_t gso_partial_features = VIRTUAL_DEV_GSO_PARTIAL_FEATURES;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD
> > + netdev_features_t xfrm_features = VIRTUAL_DEV_XFRM_FEATURES;
> > +#endif
>
> Hi Hangbin,
>
> It would be nice to avoid the #ifdefs in this function.
>
> Could xfrm_features be declared unconditoinally.
> And then used behind if(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD)) conditions?
> This would increase compile coverage (and readability IMHO).
>
> > + netdev_features_t mpls_features = VIRTUAL_DEV_MPLS_FEATURES;
> > + netdev_features_t vlan_features = VIRTUAL_DEV_VLAN_FEATURES;
> > + netdev_features_t enc_features = VIRTUAL_DEV_ENC_FEATURES;
> > + unsigned short max_header_len = ETH_HLEN;
> > + unsigned int tso_max_size = TSO_MAX_SIZE;
> > + u16 tso_max_segs = TSO_MAX_SEGS;
> > + struct net_device *lower_dev;
> > + unsigned short max_headroom;
> > + unsigned short max_tailroom;
> > + struct list_head *iter;
> > +
> > + mpls_features = netdev_base_features(mpls_features);
> > + vlan_features = netdev_base_features(vlan_features);
> > + enc_features = netdev_base_features(enc_features);
> > +
> > + netdev_for_each_lower_dev(dev, lower_dev, iter) {
> > + gso_partial_features = netdev_increment_features(gso_partial_features,
> > + lower_dev->gso_partial_features,
> > + VIRTUAL_DEV_GSO_PARTIAL_FEATURES);
> > +
> > + vlan_features = netdev_increment_features(vlan_features,
> > + lower_dev->vlan_features,
> > + VIRTUAL_DEV_VLAN_FEATURES);
> > +
> > + enc_features = netdev_increment_features(enc_features,
> > + lower_dev->hw_enc_features,
> > + VIRTUAL_DEV_ENC_FEATURES);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD
> > + xfrm_features = netdev_increment_features(xfrm_features,
> > + lower_dev->hw_enc_features,
> > + VIRTUAL_DEV_XFRM_FEATURES);
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + mpls_features = netdev_increment_features(mpls_features,
> > + lower_dev->mpls_features,
> > + VIRTUAL_DEV_MPLS_FEATURES);
> > +
> > + dst_release_flag &= lower_dev->priv_flags;
> > +
> > + if (update_header) {
> > + max_header_len = max_t(unsigned short, max_header_len,
> > + lower_dev->hard_header_len);
>
> Both the type of max_header_len and .hard_header_len is unsigned short.
> So I think max() can be used here instead of max_t(). Likewise for the
> following two lines.
>
> > + max_headroom = max_t(unsigned short, max_headroom,
> > + lower_dev->needed_headroom);
>
> Max Headroom [1] is used uninitialised the first time we reach here.
> Likewise for max_tailroom below.
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Headroom
>
> Flagged by Smatch.
>
> > + max_tailroom = max_t(unsigned short, max_tailroom,
> > + lower_dev->needed_tailroom);
> > + }
> > +
> > + tso_max_size = min(tso_max_size, lower_dev->tso_max_size);
> > + tso_max_segs = min(tso_max_segs, lower_dev->tso_max_segs);
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev->gso_partial_features = gso_partial_features;
> > + dev->vlan_features = vlan_features;
> > + dev->hw_enc_features = enc_features | NETIF_F_GSO_ENCAP_ALL |
> > + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
> > + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_TX;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD
> > + dev->hw_enc_features |= xfrm_features;
> > +#endif
> > + dev->mpls_features = mpls_features;
> > +
> > + dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE;
> > + if ((dev->priv_flags & IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE_PERM) &&
> > + dst_release_flag == (IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE | IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE_PERM))
> > + dev->priv_flags |= IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE;
> > +
> > + if (update_header) {
> > + dev->hard_header_len = max_header_len;
> > + dev->needed_headroom = max_headroom;
> > + dev->needed_tailroom = max_tailroom;
>
> Also, maybe it can't happen in practice. But I think that max_headroom and
> max_tailroom will may be used uninitialised here if the previous
> 'update_header' condition is never reached/met.
>
> Also flagged by Smatch.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + netif_set_tso_max_segs(dev, tso_max_segs);
> > + netif_set_tso_max_size(dev, tso_max_size);
> > +
> > + netdev_change_features(dev);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_compute_features_from_lowers);
> > +
>
> ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 8:02 [PATCHv4 net-next 0/4] net: common feature compute for upper interface Hangbin Liu
2025-10-14 8:02 ` [PATCHv4 net-next 1/4] net: add a common function to compute features from lowers devices Hangbin Liu
2025-10-14 9:40 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-10-15 1:25 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-10-16 11:27 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-10-16 12:38 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-10-16 13:24 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-10-17 2:53 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-10-14 14:02 ` Simon Horman
2025-10-15 3:03 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2025-10-14 8:02 ` [PATCHv4 net-next 2/4] bonding: use common function to compute the features Hangbin Liu
2025-10-14 8:02 ` [PATCHv4 net-next 3/4] team: " Hangbin Liu
2025-10-14 8:02 ` [PATCHv4 net-next 4/4] net: bridge: " Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aO8PBOMk_EqyaGKN@fedora \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=sdubroca@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).