* [PATCH net-next] net: dwmac-rk: No need to check the return value of the phy_power_on()
@ 2025-10-15 4:08 Lizhe
2025-10-15 6:17 ` Chaoyi Chen
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lizhe @ 2025-10-15 4:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, mcoquelin.stm32,
alexandre.torgue, rmk+kernel, jonas, chaoyi.chen, david.wu
Cc: netdev, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Lizhe
'phy_power_on' is a local scope one within the driver, since the return
value of the phy_power_on() function is always 0, checking its return
value is redundant.
the function name 'phy_power_on()' conflicts with the existing
phy_power_on() function in the PHY subsystem. a suitable alternative
name would be rk_phy_power_set(), particularly since when the second
argument is false, this function actually powers off the PHY
Signed-off-by: Lizhe <sensor1010@163.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c | 17 ++++-------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
index 51ea0caf16c1..9d296bfab013 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
@@ -1461,23 +1461,18 @@ static int gmac_clk_enable(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
return 0;
}
-static int phy_power_on(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
+static void rk_phy_power_on(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
{
struct regulator *ldo = bsp_priv->regulator;
struct device *dev = bsp_priv->dev;
- int ret;
if (enable) {
- ret = regulator_enable(ldo);
- if (ret)
+ if (regulator_enable(ldo))
dev_err(dev, "fail to enable phy-supply\n");
} else {
- ret = regulator_disable(ldo);
- if (ret)
+ if (regulator_disable(ldo))
dev_err(dev, "fail to disable phy-supply\n");
}
-
- return 0;
}
static struct rk_priv_data *rk_gmac_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,
@@ -1655,11 +1650,7 @@ static int rk_gmac_powerup(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv)
dev_err(dev, "NO interface defined!\n");
}
- ret = phy_power_on(bsp_priv, true);
- if (ret) {
- gmac_clk_enable(bsp_priv, false);
- return ret;
- }
+ rk_phy_power_on(bsp_priv, true);
pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dwmac-rk: No need to check the return value of the phy_power_on()
2025-10-15 4:08 [PATCH net-next] net: dwmac-rk: No need to check the return value of the phy_power_on() Lizhe
@ 2025-10-15 6:17 ` Chaoyi Chen
2025-10-15 8:59 ` Simon Horman
2025-10-15 23:43 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chaoyi Chen @ 2025-10-15 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lizhe, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni,
mcoquelin.stm32, alexandre.torgue, rmk+kernel, jonas, david.wu
Cc: netdev, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On 10/15/2025 12:08 PM, Lizhe wrote:
> 'phy_power_on' is a local scope one within the driver, since the return
> value of the phy_power_on() function is always 0, checking its return
> value is redundant.
>
> the function name 'phy_power_on()' conflicts with the existing
> phy_power_on() function in the PHY subsystem. a suitable alternative
> name would be rk_phy_power_set(), particularly since when the second
> argument is false, this function actually powers off the PHY
>
> Signed-off-by: Lizhe <sensor1010@163.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c | 17 ++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> index 51ea0caf16c1..9d296bfab013 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> @@ -1461,23 +1461,18 @@ static int gmac_clk_enable(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int phy_power_on(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
> +static void rk_phy_power_on(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
> {
> struct regulator *ldo = bsp_priv->regulator;
> struct device *dev = bsp_priv->dev;
> - int ret;
>
> if (enable) {
> - ret = regulator_enable(ldo);
> - if (ret)
> + if (regulator_enable(ldo))
> dev_err(dev, "fail to enable phy-supply\n");
> } else {
> - ret = regulator_disable(ldo);
> - if (ret)
> + if (regulator_disable(ldo))
> dev_err(dev, "fail to disable phy-supply\n");
> }
> -
> - return 0;
> }
>
> static struct rk_priv_data *rk_gmac_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,
> @@ -1655,11 +1650,7 @@ static int rk_gmac_powerup(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv)
> dev_err(dev, "NO interface defined!\n");
> }
>
> - ret = phy_power_on(bsp_priv, true);
> - if (ret) {
> - gmac_clk_enable(bsp_priv, false);
Is gmac_clk_enable() also redundant?
> - return ret;
> - }
> + rk_phy_power_on(bsp_priv, true);
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>
--
Best,
Chaoyi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dwmac-rk: No need to check the return value of the phy_power_on()
2025-10-15 4:08 [PATCH net-next] net: dwmac-rk: No need to check the return value of the phy_power_on() Lizhe
2025-10-15 6:17 ` Chaoyi Chen
@ 2025-10-15 8:59 ` Simon Horman
2025-10-15 23:43 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2025-10-15 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lizhe
Cc: andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, mcoquelin.stm32,
alexandre.torgue, rmk+kernel, jonas, chaoyi.chen, david.wu,
netdev, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 09:08:47PM -0700, Lizhe wrote:
> 'phy_power_on' is a local scope one within the driver, since the return
> value of the phy_power_on() function is always 0, checking its return
> value is redundant.
>
> the function name 'phy_power_on()' conflicts with the existing
> phy_power_on() function in the PHY subsystem. a suitable alternative
> name would be rk_phy_power_set(), particularly since when the second
> argument is false, this function actually powers off the PHY
>
> Signed-off-by: Lizhe <sensor1010@163.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c | 17 ++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> index 51ea0caf16c1..9d296bfab013 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> @@ -1461,23 +1461,18 @@ static int gmac_clk_enable(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int phy_power_on(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
> +static void rk_phy_power_on(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
Hi Lizhe,
This introduces a compilation error because phy_power_on()
is still used on line 1670.
Perhaps the hunk to update that line got lost somewhere.
--
pw-bot: changes-requested
...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dwmac-rk: No need to check the return value of the phy_power_on()
2025-10-15 4:08 [PATCH net-next] net: dwmac-rk: No need to check the return value of the phy_power_on() Lizhe
2025-10-15 6:17 ` Chaoyi Chen
2025-10-15 8:59 ` Simon Horman
@ 2025-10-15 23:43 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-10-15 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lizhe, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni,
mcoquelin.stm32, alexandre.torgue, rmk+kernel, jonas, chaoyi.chen,
david.wu
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, netdev, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel, Lizhe
Hi Lizhe,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on net-next/main]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Lizhe/net-dwmac-rk-No-need-to-check-the-return-value-of-the-phy_power_on/20251015-121214
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251015040847.6421-1-sensor1010%40163.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next] net: dwmac-rk: No need to check the return value of the phy_power_on()
config: i386-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251016/202510160726.OejMgsW0-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251016/202510160726.OejMgsW0-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510160726.OejMgsW0-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c: In function 'rk_gmac_powerdown':
>> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c:1670:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'phy_power_on'; did you mean 'rk_phy_power_on'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1670 | phy_power_on(gmac, false);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
| rk_phy_power_on
vim +1670 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
7ad269ea1a2b7d Roger Chen 2014-12-29 1662
229666c14c75ae Vincent Palatin 2016-06-15 1663 static void rk_gmac_powerdown(struct rk_priv_data *gmac)
7ad269ea1a2b7d Roger Chen 2014-12-29 1664 {
32c7bc0747bbd8 Jonas Karlman 2025-03-19 1665 if (gmac->integrated_phy && gmac->ops->integrated_phy_powerdown)
32c7bc0747bbd8 Jonas Karlman 2025-03-19 1666 gmac->ops->integrated_phy_powerdown(gmac);
fecd4d7eef8b21 David Wu 2017-08-10 1667
8f6503993911f0 Russell King (Oracle 2025-06-16 1668) pm_runtime_put_sync(gmac->dev);
aec3f415f7244b Punit Agrawal 2021-09-29 1669
7ad269ea1a2b7d Roger Chen 2014-12-29 @1670 phy_power_on(gmac, false);
7ad269ea1a2b7d Roger Chen 2014-12-29 1671 gmac_clk_enable(gmac, false);
7ad269ea1a2b7d Roger Chen 2014-12-29 1672 }
7ad269ea1a2b7d Roger Chen 2014-12-29 1673
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-15 23:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-15 4:08 [PATCH net-next] net: dwmac-rk: No need to check the return value of the phy_power_on() Lizhe
2025-10-15 6:17 ` Chaoyi Chen
2025-10-15 8:59 ` Simon Horman
2025-10-15 23:43 ` kernel test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).