From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAAF3231832 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 12:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760357312; cv=none; b=RWxPIbc0K2pbjmMFwnpzc3ePDm7EkhninD9Rm2vuFxARwU5aWZYkeBSTyDBLT7Mn6mWaaQ18I7B4f4aumPv4GeBdAApgQvZQeyjYDHlpkgTmOqUQSGfvbHtaN/RTWXcWrbjng/MpyTek/PDEDfWyw8/7cHWKLFMGhwYwIXtlzEw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760357312; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tcsXh5JauTahTEkpcNeAVyZhXtG2K93V43QkKfW9rh0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Il8XrR+IRhaa4/SBr3InPB5lOo9OY3rxSJ3DCmpz36+61eeFBgL6Tw1psfAPDJXKW0aZ7TKlilrraRo2g81YPfg+/44p+T27SmPTqdQKpuFqDjRE4GyzZZ+5qclCdqRgLPmaeZvUtnXhxlnkR/aUg+QOyg/fmDMznYmOf6NoCE4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Sj3cdaJf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Sj3cdaJf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF4A2C4CEE7; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 12:08:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1760357311; bh=tcsXh5JauTahTEkpcNeAVyZhXtG2K93V43QkKfW9rh0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Sj3cdaJfvZ1p/oy3RgDCdKbF4z1GQMYSq/PnbW2+yPjo5zRHtqj3jx/TYmLPQIhan /mo4+VhsBZej9kXC9VM65VNS69DSEOqduGA8Hjqo+LS69fH7vdM/TvodgoaykgGROc A8ogbNbN/Px7ZDZ7O/RHD/LZkliWbXmDTvthZ2jJDAmyIs/vhiUNgQBjpOUDiAPSjQ a+GbBmBKikcagodHHXViZfBfRyOUvao3WzN3zIu1LZ3dszxnTfgAFwc2doDwBlUGfv 7pt1UTDEAbwptYrC/1pMxAGGtP3UhPfYkyAeBCCgLR23EowuwEFuwzlwRifHyIL3SW 8dWBsEWdpS6TA== Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 13:08:26 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: luoxuanqiang Cc: Jason Xing , Jiayuan Chen , Paolo Abeni , kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuniyu@google.com, "Paul E. McKenney" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Xuanqiang Luo , Frederic Weisbecker , Neeraj Upadhyay Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/3] rculist: Add hlist_nulls_replace_rcu() and hlist_nulls_replace_init_rcu() Message-ID: References: <20250926074033.1548675-1-xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev> <20250926074033.1548675-2-xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev> <71de19ef-6f63-47f5-b5ed-9eaef932439c@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <71de19ef-6f63-47f5-b5ed-9eaef932439c@linux.dev> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 03:04:34PM +0800, luoxuanqiang wrote: > > 在 2025/10/13 14:26, Jason Xing 写道: > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 1:36 PM Jiayuan Chen wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 11:16:00AM +0800, Paolo Abeni wrote: > > > > On 9/26/25 9:40 AM, xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev wrote: > > > > > From: Xuanqiang Luo > > > > > > > > > > Add two functions to atomically replace RCU-protected hlist_nulls entries. > > > [...] > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xuanqiang Luo > > > > This deserves explicit ack from RCU maintainers. > > > > > > > > Since we are finalizing the net-next PR, I suggest to defer this series > > > > to the next cycle, to avoid rushing such request. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Paolo > > > Hi maintainers, > > > > > > This patch was previously held off due to the merge window. > > > > > > Now that the merge net-next has open and no further changes are required, > > > could we please consider merging it directly? > > > > > > Apologies for the slight push, but I'm hoping we can get a formal > > > commit backported to our production branch. > > I suppose a new version that needs to be rebased is necessary. > > > > Thanks, > > Jason > > I’ve rebased the series of patches onto the latest codebase locally and > didn’t encounter any errors. > > If there’s anything else I can do to help get these patches merged, just > let me know. Hi, The patch-set has been marked as "Deffered" in Patchwork. Presumably by Paolo in conjunction with his response above. As such the patch-set needs to be (rebased and) reposted in order for it to be considered by the maintainers again. I think the best practice is for this to happen _after_ one of the maintainers has sent an "ANN" email announcing that net-next has re-opened. I don't believe that has happened yet. Thanks!