From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EC75329C58 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 16:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760631940; cv=none; b=YNYq2xIz1Feng/HbIx5IFLsr6r3XGrMVIghZetPXEcgdnCDbmyjO25+dQoU+D6BTIoMHKeQ/i5yXxl9gelfOvl4NRN8TVzBEbf6TsP2oXNNHzJjLVZqTx7MHy9VAmcsZ6HloBUNy3kDVFiE5wuavlo1PQXVElJNh6fcSWedSdoE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760631940; c=relaxed/simple; bh=C5bfVnVieDnVvuFLtLPDnPLoc3SZgQ5zz39FOjIOY9s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nSC8iAH64D5yENmIwJvwGfem5GTBrgpkh8qPjcS8jTGtUqp2ZJD7GkyZGHrCWhPW8tsNB0y6PcU/az0lNMy177R6bQrB3pgw2kgzIHLaTy8Ga/mxWLEIhi0rOVmjYUzQTls/2yOQ0o2zusosJsdGcyI5ywFIGJzVKGJgsMJLDwQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=RRZfZSY1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RRZfZSY1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B1A9C4CEFB; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 16:25:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1760631939; bh=C5bfVnVieDnVvuFLtLPDnPLoc3SZgQ5zz39FOjIOY9s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RRZfZSY1eNbF1F4KK7xw9HKIqkyO8iQEwa9bQHboU5L68UIo1mX1o/ElOEh7Eqign X2mW4EefZYxocofQgsBQJlx6aoIQBxLTvtyynVdg5IcprFj1O9shfCv/qX+NIj6Hog MNjfiI7I/DUpHeiCmHWfDPdmRw9t5sJoYctNQk+7Pkrf2d8ruzx6NzrV2PvgLw0PQE V6ccWG89ITdlqPAHkOYOSve8wDs5oJoQLHB5aysJmkeL/I+Z7rHi1wD5S7ic34qLzg JcC6nRWiCkV7x0LPL+om2pOscsTOn9/u++5vHQvYhcNYDsq/r+13hJ3uvhPeavwFEP RwzNYIAmhPWSg== Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 17:25:37 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: John Ousterhout Cc: Netdev Subject: Re: Build commit for Patchwork? Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 09:07:09AM -0700, John Ousterhout wrote: > Is there a way to tell which commit Patchwork uses for its builds? > > Patchwork builds are generating this error: > > ‘struct flowi_common’ has no member named ‘flowic_tos’; did you mean > ‘flowic_oif’? > > (https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/static/nipa/1012035/14269094/build_32bit/stderr) > > but the member flowic_tos seems to be present in all recent commits > that I can find. Hi John, I'm not sure that it's explicitly exposed. But if you look at one of the builds for the 1st patch of the series then it will start with a baseline build (that is, build of the tree the patch-set is applied on top of). In this case, looking at the URL below, which is linked from the first patch in the series in Patchwork, I see. cb85ca4c0a34 ("Merge branch 'net-airoha-npu-introduce-support-for-airoha-7583-npu'") https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/static/nipa/1012035/14269097/build_32bit/stdout